Jump to content

Costar Bluestar Install

Paul58

By Paul58
in Audio, Electronics & Software

Recommended Posts

Paul58 Enthusiast

Paul58

Posted
Posted

I installed th BlueSTAR bluetooth hands free kit this afternoon, unfortunately my camera battery was dead and I didn't get pics.

 

The toughest part was getting the silver trim off, once that task was complete the rest was pretty easy. Remove the power outlets/switches and the HVAC controls and you can see the OnStar module undeer the radio. I did not have to disconnect anything but the OnStar module which has two wire harnesses and two antenna cables. Getting it out was another trick, there are to clips that need to be held away from the module as you lift up on the module. Once the clips are past the edge of the OnStar module, it lifts up and out easily. The BlueSTAR module simply pluges into the wire harness and then slips back in where the OnStar module was. It comes with a piece of double-sided tape to keep it in place and prevent rattles.

 

Once everything was connected I turned on the truck asnd tested it. It has redundent controls, the Mirror controls (phone button to place a call, OnStar button to end a call, and the red cross button [held for 3 seconds] allows you to raise and lower the volme of the handsfree set using the phone and onstar buttons). You also have the steering wheel controls, (the mute button will place a call, the arrow button ends the call). clarity is exceptional! It did take a bit of tweaking with the volume via the mirror controls to get the sound level equal to that of the speakers (steering wheel volume does raise and lower bluetooth volume during a call).

 

Overall very pleased with this device which utilixes a Motorola HF850 Handsfree device which is very campatible with a wide varity of cell phones. It paired with mine with out a glitch.

 

The only glitch I did run up against is a "Check Charging System" error displayed on the DIC and the Red Battery light is on. I don't know if this has anything to do with the removal of the OnStar Module, installation of the BueSTAR kit, or just a coincidence. The volt guage shows over 14 volts while driving, so it appears the charging system is working. I tried to clear the code with my ScanGuage, but it said no code found, so I'm not sure what to do next. Everything else is working fine.

brims Senior Enthusiast

brims

Posted
Posted

Good to hear it worked out for you, if it turns out that charging system issue isn't related to the BlueStar module, I may consider this as I have no use for OnStar.

Paul58 Enthusiast

Paul58

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Good to hear it worked out for you, if it turns out that charging system issue isn't related to the BlueStar module, I may consider this as I have no use for OnStar.

 

This morning the error was gone and the red Battery light did not come back on, so sitting over night must have cleared it. I think I was the cause, I didn't remove the negative battery terminal as is normally recommended when installing electrical mods, and while testing I had the key in the on position instaed of the accessory position and did not think to shut off the head lights, so it probably caused a high draw on the battery which resulted in the error and Battery light. Anyway, all is well this morning, and the BlueSTAR is as clear as making a call using OnStar, only there are no additional monthly fees!

  • 1 month later...
mlangkamp New Member

mlangkamp

Posted
Posted

I got my new BlueStar this weekend and got it all installed. I noticed that there is a fair amount of static through the speakers though. I played with the volume on my phone (BB Pearl 8130), the truck (08 GMC w/o NAV) and the BlueStar unit. It seems the best I can make it sound is if the radio is down low. The only problem with this is after it disconnects and you reconnect the volume goes back up to a default level. Does anyone know if there's a way to have this reprogrammed to a lower default? It's just a pain having to adjust the volume down every time.

 

Thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,258 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Sugar Bears 2015 GMC Terrain SLE-2 2.4 AWD

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...