Jump to content

Need Some Ideas


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey Guys,

I've got the following mods on my 03 gmc w/5.3

 

S&B CAI, Diablo Sport Tuner

Helix Throttle Body Spacer

VR Velocity Stack

Magnaflow 3" Catback exhaust

 

I'm looking for something to add that will give me some more low end torque for pulling heavy trailers here in the hills of WV. I've thought about adding electric fans to boost a few HP and I've also thought about shorty headers but everyone seems to be against them. I don't want to get into major exhaust mods for long tubes. Let me here your ideas and opions. The mods I have now definately made a difference over stock. I installed them all in one day and there was a definate seat of the pants gain. Thanks ahead of time.

Posted

Jamie,

 

I would recommend adding a set of headers. I added headers to my 2000 GMC and it was huge improvement. The headers I put on my truck came from Banks then I coupled it with monster exhaust system. They are not hard to install if you have a hoist and a wire feed welder.

Posted

Well if it was me, I'd loose the TB spacer, thats not doing anything but making your truck whistle. Since you have diablo, I'd ask diablew to write you a custom tune for your truck to help get all that you can from the tuner. Do some data logging and make sure your LTFT's are dailed in and you'll see a nice improvement from the cookie cutter tune diablo has in there now.

 

Gears.. What gears does your truck have now? Gears would be the next choice. Depending on what tires your running, 4.10s or 4.56's would get you some nice low end grunt.

Posted

What is the application? Pulling highway speeds with 7k lbs, or pulling back roads? WV is about the worst area for pulling on the highways. The interstate pulls aren't steep, but it's constantly up and down, up and down, up and... well, I guess that describes it... all at high speed.

Posted

Ditch the TB spacer its just a good paperweight. Go back to the stock exhaust for some back pressure and more bottom end torque.

 

Hey Guys,

I've got the following mods on my 03 gmc w/5.3

 

S&B CAI, Diablo Sport Tuner

Helix Throttle Body Spacer

VR Velocity Stack

Magnaflow 3" Catback exhaust

 

I'm looking for something to add that will give me some more low end torque for pulling heavy trailers here in the hills of WV. I've thought about adding electric fans to boost a few HP and I've also thought about shorty headers but everyone seems to be against them. I don't want to get into major exhaust mods for long tubes. Let me here your ideas and opions. The mods I have now definately made a difference over stock. I installed them all in one day and there was a definate seat of the pants gain. Thanks ahead of time.

Posted

Most of my pulling is bettween 55-70mph. I'd say 3/4 of it is 2 lane mtn back roads with between 5000-6000 lbs. I already have factory 4.10 gears. I really shouldn't complain about the power that I have because I really don't struggle at all with all that I have and I still manage to get about 11-12mpg pulling that kind of weight. Just always wanting more. As for the TB spacer I don't have a whine or whistle. I've done a lot of mods to the fuel trims and such in my diablo to get everything dialed in where it should be. Everything I have on the truck except the exhaust I bought as a package deal for $500.

 

I don't think putting stock exhaust on would help any at all. Stock exhaust is 2.75" in diameter and the Magnaflow is only 3". That is very minimal difference.

Posted

Headers will raise the torque band and the stock exhaust will lower the band. The TB spacer was good on wet Carb or TBI systems to improve fuel atomization but on PFI the fuel is injected at the valve head so no improvement will result.

 

Most of my pulling is bettween 55-70mph. I'd say 3/4 of it is 2 lane mtn back roads with between 5000-6000 lbs. I already have factory 4.10 gears. I really shouldn't complain about the power that I have because I really don't struggle at all with all that I have and I still manage to get about 11-12mpg pulling that kind of weight. Just always wanting more. As for the TB spacer I don't have a whine or whistle. I've done a lot of mods to the fuel trims and such in my diablo to get everything dialed in where it should be. Everything I have on the truck except the exhaust I bought as a package deal for $500.

 

I don't think putting stock exhaust on would help any at all. Stock exhaust is 2.75" in diameter and the Magnaflow is only 3". That is very minimal difference.

Posted

When you say raise the torque band do you mean raising it in the RPM range or just more torque thourghout the powerband? Shorty or Long Tube?

Posted
Most of my pulling is bettween 55-70mph. I'd say 3/4 of it is 2 lane mtn back roads with between 5000-6000 lbs. I already have factory 4.10 gears. I really shouldn't complain about the power that I have because I really don't struggle at all with all that I have and I still manage to get about 11-12mpg pulling that kind of weight. Just always wanting more. As for the TB spacer I don't have a whine or whistle. I've done a lot of mods to the fuel trims and such in my diablo to get everything dialed in where it should be. Everything I have on the truck except the exhaust I bought as a package deal for $500.

I don't think putting stock exhaust on would help any at all. Stock exhaust is 2.75" in diameter and the Magnaflow is only 3". That is very minimal difference.

 

That's a 24% increase in volume. That is a huge amount. These engines have a large valve overlap. And because of that they need some backpressure to produce low end torque. Don't think of back pressure as a clog in the system, think of it as more of the exhaust is shooting out faster.

 

Just imagine the same amount of water coming out of a big hose, verses one that has a pointed nozzle.

Posted

"That's a 24% increase in volume. That is a huge amount. These engines have a large valve overlap. And because of that they need some backpressure to produce low end torque. Don't think of back pressure as a clog in the system, think of it as more of the exhaust is shooting out faster.

 

Just imagine the same amount of water coming out of a big hose, verses one that has a pointed nozzle."

 

Not to question the above but just about every company that designs, test and sell exhaust all seem to have 3" and they usually have dyno runs to prove the gains. Some of the companys that offer single in and dual out even have dual 2.5. That's a lot of flow and they get gains. But anyhow the exhaust isn't something that's going to be changed. I seen a huge difference with all the mods added during one days time. I don't have dyno anywhere near to be able to prove those gains. My truck shifts far less than my buddy's stock truck when pulling the same loaded trailer.

 

Are high performance plugs/wires/ignition something that will help or too much money for the power?

Posted

if you want a noticeable difference then do a motor swap. go from the 5.3L to a 6.0L. I'm serious. it's a simple bolt in application, it will even run on a stock tune just fine (although I'd get a custom tune to dial it in correctly). Been there, done that. It's the cheapest way to get the power you are looking for. The only other way to get a noticeable power gain would be to supercharge it, but that's some serious $$$. The motor swap can be done with a low mileage salvage yard long block in one weekend with a buddy and easily for under $1,200.

Posted
if you want a noticeable difference then do a motor swap. go from the 5.3L to a 6.0L. I'm serious. it's a simple bolt in application, it will even run on a stock tune just fine (although I'd get a custom tune to dial it in correctly). Been there, done that. It's the cheapest way to get the power you are looking for. The only other way to get a noticeable power gain would be to supercharge it, but that's some serious $$$. The motor swap can be done with a low mileage salvage yard long block in one weekend with a buddy and easily for under $1,200.

 

That sounds more along the lines of my funding and such. I may have to check into the 6.0L that my uncle has setting in his basement. I just figured it would be too costly to purchase the parts that would make it work with my tranny and so on.

Posted
I may have to check into the 6.0L that my uncle has setting in his basement. I just figured it would be too costly to purchase the parts that would make it work with my tranny and so on.

 

By all means, use it! There's no replacement for displacement. It should drop in fairly easily. Meanwhile, sell the Velocity Stack and the TB spacer.

 

If you decide not to, however, Jenna mentioned that a torque converter swap would help - you should look into a TrailBlazer converter or a modified one from Circle D. I'm using their 3K-3.2K stall, but to keep your low end with a stock or *very* mild cam you may want to use their 2.6K-2.8K stall. For a cam that will work well on your stock converter, you should look into a cam like Comp's popular 212/218 low-lift cam.

Posted

as long as the 6.0L motor has aluminum heads and NOT iron heads it is a direct bolt in replacement.

the cost of $1,200 I mentioned was roughly:

$1,000.00 salvage yard long block motor (reuse your intake manifold, fuel rails and accessories)

~$200 to cover fluids, one or tools you might not have had and beer

 

the 6.0L that was originally bolted to a 4L80e transmissions (HD), but has aluminum heads will have a spacer on the crank shaft behind the flywheel/ flexplate. Take that off and throw it away, reuse your flexplate from the original motor. Re-use the oil cooler block off plate from the original motor. If it was originally in a 1/2 ton truck it's good to go as is.

 

if the 6.0L has iron heads (some 2001 and older) then the crank shaft is the incorrect length and will not work for this application.

 

I've had my hands in 3 motor swaps, one on a 2000, 2002 and a 2004. It should take two competent people no more than a day and a half to get it complete taking their time. I did one with two guys helping that couldn't even pull a water pump before we started and we did it in about a day and 3/4.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It is possible to add your own 12v outlet to your truck.  Check out this video:   I verified via GM Upfitters that pin 31 is the same on the 1500 trucks.  The wire is GM part number 84779405.   You can get the GM 12v outlet from Amazon  https://www.amazon.com/Genuine-Accessory-Receptacle-25774623-13549530/dp/B0F1H9YRGF EWAY 12 Volt Power Adapter for GM   https://www.amazon.com/EWAY-Chevrolet-Silverado-Cigarette-Ignition/dp/B0915RRW6Q/ref=sr_1_1?   I just haven't figured out a good place to put the 12v outlet in my truck.   Some people are getting USB-C to 12V adapters  https://www.amazon.com/WYMECT-Cigarette-Lighter-Socket-Adapter/dp/B0F87WNQKB/ref=sr_1_1_sspa? Not sure if they provide the correct amperage that a device like a tire inflator would need.  
    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...