Jump to content

4.3l To 350 Swap


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I have a 1995 GMC Sierra with a 4.3l. I just found a 1972 350 motor and 350 transmission. I am trying to find out if this will be a simple swap or will I have to do any mods as far as mounting goes. Will my existing transmission bolt up to this motor? I plan on using the carburetor and ignition from the 1972 motor. Thanks!!!!

Posted
Hi,

 

I have a 1995 GMC Sierra with a 4.3l. I just found a 1972 350 motor and 350 transmission. I am trying to find out if this will be a simple swap or will I have to do any mods as far as mounting goes. Will my existing transmission bolt up to this motor? I plan on using the carburetor and ignition from the 1972 motor. Thanks!!!!

As far as I know, the trans you have should bolt right up, and the 350 should just drop right in. I really doubt the 4.3L Torque converter would mate to the 350 flywheel, and I am almost 100% sure the 4.3L starter wont fit.

 

The T/H 350 Trans is a stronger trans than the 4L60E you have on your 4.3 though.

 

I'm sure it wont be as simple a swap as it should be, but for the old complexity meter rating I would rate it a 6 - 6.5 out of 10.

Posted

Transmission, starter and so forth are bolt ons. Unless your 350 has a different flexplate than the 4.3 V6 does of course. You have 2 ring gear sizes, being 153 tooth and 168 tooth. Even if they are different all that affects is the starter.

 

Accesories should bolt up, most of the holes present on the late model blocks were there from the past as well.

 

The thing to remember is a 4.3 is nothing more than a 350 missing 2 cylinders.

 

Motor mounts are different so you need to buy the correct ones for a V8 in your case.

 

Then there is the potential to need a heavier rad, you need a V8 trucks fan shroud and so on.

 

It's not a terrible swap really. Honestly if you want to keep the TBI versus going to a carb all you need is a V8's distributor and intake manifold, injectors and prom to run it. Your choice however.

Posted
Transmission, starter and so forth are bolt ons. Unless your 350 has a different flexplate than the 4.3 V6 does of course. You have 2 ring gear sizes, being 153 tooth and 168 tooth. Even if they are different all that affects is the starter.

 

Accesories should bolt up, most of the holes present on the late model blocks were there from the past as well.

 

The thing to remember is a 4.3 is nothing more than a 350 missing 2 cylinders.

 

Motor mounts are different so you need to buy the correct ones for a V8 in your case.

 

Then there is the potential to need a heavier rad, you need a V8 trucks fan shroud and so on.

 

It's not a terrible swap really. Honestly if you want to keep the TBI versus going to a carb all you need is a V8's distributor and intake manifold, injectors and prom to run it. Your choice however.

Yeah the engine should mount in exactly the same place if I'm not mistaken...minus the actual mounts like you said.

As for the fan shroud, I wouldn't even bother...we put an electric fan in my buddies K5 blazer out of a Ford Taurus, with a temp switch. It pulls way more air than anything on the market that's relatively affordable...(3000CFM per fan and there is enough area to fit 2 on a Full size Chevy rad)

Posted
Transmission, starter and so forth are bolt ons. Unless your 350 has a different flexplate than the 4.3 V6 does of course. You have 2 ring gear sizes, being 153 tooth and 168 tooth. Even if they are different all that affects is the starter.

 

Accesories should bolt up, most of the holes present on the late model blocks were there from the past as well.

 

The thing to remember is a 4.3 is nothing more than a 350 missing 2 cylinders.

 

Motor mounts are different so you need to buy the correct ones for a V8 in your case.

 

Then there is the potential to need a heavier rad, you need a V8 trucks fan shroud and so on.

 

It's not a terrible swap really. Honestly if you want to keep the TBI versus going to a carb all you need is a V8's distributor and intake manifold, injectors and prom to run it. Your choice however.

Yeah the engine should mount in exactly the same place if I'm not mistaken...minus the actual mounts like you said.

As for the fan shroud, I wouldn't even bother...we put an electric fan in my buddies K5 blazer out of a Ford Taurus, with a temp switch. It pulls way more air than anything on the market that's relatively affordable...(3000CFM per fan and there is enough area to fit 2 on a Full size Chevy rad)

 

 

Just suggesting if he wanted to use a mechanical fan. I need to do that swap on my 96 pickup...... I like the dual fan setup on my 96 9C1 Caprice and may just use one of those.

Posted
Transmission, starter and so forth are bolt ons. Unless your 350 has a different flexplate than the 4.3 V6 does of course. You have 2 ring gear sizes, being 153 tooth and 168 tooth. Even if they are different all that affects is the starter.

 

Accesories should bolt up, most of the holes present on the late model blocks were there from the past as well.

 

The thing to remember is a 4.3 is nothing more than a 350 missing 2 cylinders.

 

Motor mounts are different so you need to buy the correct ones for a V8 in your case.

 

Then there is the potential to need a heavier rad, you need a V8 trucks fan shroud and so on.

 

It's not a terrible swap really. Honestly if you want to keep the TBI versus going to a carb all you need is a V8's distributor and intake manifold, injectors and prom to run it. Your choice however.

Yeah the engine should mount in exactly the same place if I'm not mistaken...minus the actual mounts like you said.

As for the fan shroud, I wouldn't even bother...we put an electric fan in my buddies K5 blazer out of a Ford Taurus, with a temp switch. It pulls way more air than anything on the market that's relatively affordable...(3000CFM per fan and there is enough area to fit 2 on a Full size Chevy rad)

 

 

Just suggesting if he wanted to use a mechanical fan. I need to do that swap on my 96 pickup...... I like the dual fan setup on my 96 9C1 Caprice and may just use one of those.

 

Yeah those are fairly high too...cant remember the CFM though...we did look at them when looking for a fan.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,677
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RobbertClaus
    Newest Member
    RobbertClaus
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 453 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No I didn’t watch a video of a person who analyzes oil for a living explain general oil usage. For clarity I did ask my brothers one who runs our equipment business. The other who runs our old ROW business about oil usage. Nothing has changed since I retired. Their personal vehicles or work vehicles use no oil. Not enough to see on the oil checking device. Then I pondered. I like to ponder. In this extended oil changing world with oil change countdowns or lights. If engines used say a qt every 2500 miles or up to even 4000 miles. With oil changes reaching as high as 15000 miles. Normal for most people is eight to ten. Vehicles should potentially be seizing up all over the place. Especially in hilly terrain. Just how many people actually check their oil? Maybe 10 percent. Those are the people that probably change their oil early. I like to research used car listings. I have five favorite dealers I check. They all list carfax with their listing. It’s rare to see vehicles with anything but extended oil changes. Transmission service, forget about it. I’ve seen Honda and Toyota certified vehicles up to 100K miles and ten years old. With nothing but normal maintenance. Isn’t nice we all have different experiences and believe our way is the best. You certainly get backup for whatever you believe. Life would be boring otherwise.
    • Interesting rumor. Dealers near me have been tight-lipped so far, but if this reveal actually happens next week, I'm really hoping they finally give the HD a proper interior overhaul. The competition has been eating their lunch in the cabin department for a while now.
    • There are a few good takeaways in that video that pertain to this thread, certainly the possibility of the oil control rings having buildup, the fuel injectors and how clean or not that they are ending up affecting the pistons rings carbon buildup, and the fact that its normal up to a point for a given engine to use some oil, and that the oil quality that is being utilized is part of that ring clogging up issue as well.   I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who has a baby LZ0 duramax and he had bought it slightly used but it does consume some oil and he has switched over to 5W-30 Euro spec oil and in this case that never made a difference in consumption over the factory 0W-20 recommendation. He finds it uses a quart in about 3500 miles and as he goes a ways over that distance he adds oil to full and goes another 1000 miles or so and then changes oil and is typically at 40% or so left on the oil monitor at that point with his use case of quite a lot of highway miles and more limited in short run use. I don't know what other LZ0 engines are doing for oil consumption but that is what his is doing. 
    • I dont care what Lake says. Goodnight. 
    • Ok well I guess Lake disagrees with me on a few points. I call oil consumption pretty basic. Rudimentary. He calls it "really complicated." I think 1qt consumed in 3k miles is a lot. He says that's normal. In 22 minutes, he'll use his natural talent to explain oil consumption to anyone watching this video. He covers everything from obvious engine damage to how normally functioning healthy engines consume oil by design. Lake explicitly states how you drive will impact oil consumption.   Shut up and watch:    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...