Jump to content

Massive Signatures

tanked_darren

By tanked_darren
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

tanked_darren Senior Enthusiast

tanked_darren

Posted
Posted

Shit some people have signatures so big I have to scroll over a whole screen just to read thier posts. Very annoying, yeah sure you got a nice truck but it doesn't need to be 1920x1200 or some other ridiculous size! :dunno:

 

Are people that retarded to not know how huge thier sig pics are??

Matt_ Senior Enthusiast

Matt_

Posted
Posted
Is mine too big?

 

Although its only 240 high which isn't horrible, it is accentuated by the huge list of mods.

 

Don't you have a nicer pic of your truck? I'd try to get a bit closer to 200 high and widen it some more so its not a square. And as far as your mods go.... just put a link to your garage. Do you really need everyone to read that you have ABS delete, a bug deflector, chrome door handles, etc?

 

Yours is nowhere near the worst on the site though... some are just outrageous and I agree with the OP, they are annoying! :dunno:

Matt_ Senior Enthusiast

Matt_

Posted
Posted
I don't have chrome handles or tahoe assist steps anymore. Color matched now.

 

Hence, you should delete the mods list in your sig :dunno:

jro909 Senior Enthusiast

jro909

Posted
Posted
That picture is way too big. I still had 2500hd badges on it in that pic, and chrome door handles and a tahoe assist step.

 

 

dude, in that pic the only thing you can tell you have is atleast two wheels and a nice coat of snow

BigBlueLB756 Senior Enthusiast

BigBlueLB756

Posted
Posted

Damn! So everybody wants a little one now!

Headline: Sales of Viagra and Cialis Shrivel

(Photos at Ten)

 

Will wonders never cease.

jrod332 Enthusiast

jrod332

Posted
Posted

I know what you mean about the sigs. I could also do without someone replying to a post and quoting the 4 previous paragraphs, and responding with one or two words. Sometimes they take up a whole page.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • silveradosid
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By silveradosid · Posted

      same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • Coastie05
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...