snyderfarms Posted December 10, 2010 Posted December 10, 2010 So, I'm sitting here watching the Thursday night game and they just showed the NFC playoff picture. I think it is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rams or the Squawks could make it over the Saints, Giants, or the Packers. Let's say the Rams or the Squawks finish 7-9 do they deserve a playoff birth? IMO no they don't
wurgs Posted December 10, 2010 Posted December 10, 2010 Not a big fan of division winners getting an automatic playoff berth. Too many good teams get left out. Nothing special about beating teams in a crappy division, let the teams with the best record in. Its especially bad when you can't even have a winning record in that crappy division
arctictwist Posted December 10, 2010 Posted December 10, 2010 AGREED!!!!!!!!! Isnt that what the wild card is for?
phase4 Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Guess the Jets backed up their trash talk. Huge win over NE
tanked_darren Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 So, I'm sitting here watching the Thursday night game and they just showed the NFC playoff picture. I think it is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rams or the Squawks could make it over the Saints, Giants, or the Packers. Let's say the Rams or the Squawks finish 7-9 do they deserve a playoff birth? IMO no they don't Not a big fan of division winners getting an automatic playoff berth. Too many good teams get left out. Nothing special about beating teams in a crappy division, let the teams with the best record in. Its especially bad when you can't even have a winning record in that crappy division Yeah but they still beat last years superbowl champions, and almost came back against the bears. I think the division champions should make the playoffs regardless of records, thats what divisions are for.
kawtoy_77 Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Guess the Jets backed up their trash talk. Huge win over NE ...AND NEXT, THE STEELERS! GO JETS!!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.