Jump to content

2004 Silverado Driver's Side Mirror Not Diming....please Help!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys. So on my 2004 Silverado 1500, the driver's side rea rview mirror suddenly stopped dimming at night. The mirror was never hit or is not damaged whatsoever. Everything else on the mirror works fine (side marker, electronic adjustments and auto fold, etc.) I didn't think it was that big of a deal at first but it was such a nice feature, especially with those blinding HID lights! I tried searching for a fuse or something thinking it was electronic but found noting. I know a replacement is rather expensive and a few people said all I needed to do was replace the glass. Can someone please help! Thanks!!!

Posted

Do you have anything blocking the rear window? Mine stopped working when I put a topper on with limo black tint in the windows. I know that it still works (the rear and driver side mirrors dimming), because when I have the topper off it works.

Posted

The auto side mirror dim is one of my favorite features! Didn't even know I had it when I bought it. I suspect that just replacing the glass will be expensive, hope not.

Posted
Do you have anything blocking the rear window? Mine stopped working when I put a topper on with limo black tint in the windows. I know that it still works (the rear and driver side mirrors dimming), because when I have the topper off it works.

 

 

Nope :/ nothing blocking the window. It's funny though, I used to have a back rack on it and it worked fine. Then right around the time I took it off, it stopped working! I wonder if the sensor for the side mirror is the same as the sensor for the rear view mirror. Then again, my rear view mirror works fine....

Posted
Do you have anything blocking the rear window? Mine stopped working when I put a topper on with limo black tint in the windows. I know that it still works (the rear and driver side mirrors dimming), because when I have the topper off it works.

 

 

Nope :/ nothing blocking the window. It's funny though, I used to have a back rack on it and it worked fine. Then right around the time I took it off, it stopped working! I wonder if the sensor for the side mirror is the same as the sensor for the rear view mirror. Then again, my rear view mirror works fine....

 

 

I have a OEM Replacement Glass available if you need one...its from a 2006 Yukon. (I sell a few parts on the truck board here)

 

I really have a hard time figuring out why it would just stop working though....are you sure the button on the rearview mirror in the cab didn't get bumped turning off the auto dim feature...there isn't anything blocking the rearview mirror on the front side sensor either is there..

 

Let me know I can help you with this glass if that is the route you have to go. I'd like $125 shipped...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 794 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...