Jump to content

Rough Idle When Cold, Random Misfire, Lean Codes


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2000 4x4 Suburban with the 5.3L engine. For the last several years it has had a rough idle and stumble when cold. The stumble is sometimes still there once warmed up, but the rough idle goes away.

 

On summer mornings, start it and go, with only a little rough idle, but not enough to really cause issues. On cold mornings below 50 degrees and very bad below 30 degrees, it will start and barely stay running. Many times it will set codes for random misfire, and several times has also set "Bank 0 lean, Bank 1 lean", although those only set once in a while.

 

These issues have been a pain, but when it gets serious is when I am towing my camper. Normal towing down the road you would never know, but pull into a park and try backing up a hill. Even though it doesn't miss during normal driving, it will miss badly even when hot while I am doing that. Even a couple of times I had to put it in 4-low in order to get the rpm above the miss and have enough power to back up the hill.

 

Over the last couple of years I have replaced Spark Plugs, MAF, MAP, TPS, Fuel pump, and Fuel pressure regulator. I have also cleaned the EGR valve, although it was very clean to begin with. I also plugged it, and it didn't make any difference. I have monitored fuel pressure, and even though it doesn't hold the pressure when I turn the key off due to the check valve in the pump, it does hold 43-45psi (if I remember right) at all times while running.

 

I am at a loss, but have recently heard about intake leaks. I am thinking of pulling it to find out, but does this sound like the intake or something else?

  • 2 years later...
Posted

It's your manifold gasket. When it's cold the gasket shrinks and you are getting a vacuum leak. As the engine warms up the gasket expands and no more vacuum leak, hence no more misfire. Change your manifold gaskets and it will fix your misfire

  • 1 month later...
Posted

my 09 is doimg the same minus the codes but at 85,000 i have to try and convince dealer manifold gaskets are the issue, any tips for proving that?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Listen to

 

 

It's your manifold gasket. When it's cold the gasket shrinks and you are getting a vacuum leak. As the engine warms up the gasket expands and no more vacuum leak, hence no more misfire. Change your manifold gaskets and it will fix your misfire

He's right, it's your manifold gaskets. Change them and it will go away 99% of the time.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...