Jump to content

Mishap with my avatar...


MiSdIrEcTeD_1

Recommended Posts

Posted

K, so I leave work today with everything goin good.. Come home and sign on GMTC and get a PM from MERVZ concerning my avatar.. So, we talked on AOL and sorted out and figured out what happened:

 

Obviously the avatar with the guy punching (that everyone liked so much!) which I was using, is hosted by an a$$hole who found out I was using it and decided to put a different picture in its exact URL place.. Resulting in the URL to which my avatar was linked, to show the new pic that he put in its place...

 

Just wanted to clear things up and apoligize to anyone who had the misfortune of seeing what my avatar became...

 

All is well now though, and MERVZ is hosting my new one for me.. Hope everyone likes 'er!  :eek:

Posted
Yup, it was a really nasty picture! glad we got it all worked out!  :eek:
Posted
I'm liking the new one too!  I didn't see the other one?  What was it?  PM me since it was considered offensive.
Posted
I'm liking the new one too!  I didn't see the other one?  What was it?  PM me since it was considered offensive.

The other one I had wasnt the offensive one... It was just this .gif from a movie of a guy punching... The offensive one that the guy replaced in its URL was... Well, just ask mervz... You dont wanna see it...  :eek: Ive got several disks full of animated .gifs... If someone would like me to email some of the .gifs to them so that they could be hosted and used by some of u guys, I would be glad to do so... Just PM me... Ive got everything from Piston animations, to cartoons, to women dancing :thumb: HEHE...

Posted

:thumb: Don't know whos is better, misdirected 1 or Shotgun. :thumb:  They are both great.

Since you guys like HOOTERS girls.... Heres a few that I think would be cool for some of you to use as avatars... I wouldnt think there would be anything offensive about using them... He11, My current one isnt even considered offensive so im positive theres nothing wrong with these... PG-13 at the worst, hehe....

 

JUST REMEBER THAT SHOTGUN HAS THE GREATEST< AND WAS THE FIRST THAT HAD THE IDEA TO USE A HOOTERS GIRL!

 

amandas.jpg

Christy2s.jpg

malissas.jpg

Teras.jpg

Posted

I saw that last night. :eek:

Why do you call that "punching"? Whatever you want to call it, it's nasty.

Posted

I saw that last night. :eek:

Why do you call that "punching"? Whatever you want to call it, it's nasty.

You know what friz??? Maybe if you wouldve paid attention to my post you would understand that what did show up yesterday as my avatar wasnt my fault... As for my "punching" guy avatar, Maybe a few of the members can fill you in on what it was before the a$$hole who was hosting it decided to change it to something else!  :angry:  :urgent:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I would argue that GMPartsDirect has that info wrong.    The service manual for R+R the lower arm and for adjusting camber/caster, none of the steps say to discard and replace the nut or the bolt.    The only part that gets discarded is the plastic cam adjustment retainer that is in the eccentric from the factory.     The LCA nut torque spec is: First Pass: 180 Y (133 lb ft) Final Pass: 90 –105 Degrees    
    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. They read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post. Trending is very important.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...