Jump to content

Oil Analyasis


firecadet613

Recommended Posts

Posted

Got the latest oil anaylasis report back on my Blazer today.

 

http://www.geocities.com/firecadet613/blazer.jpg

 

How does it look to everyone?  Keep in mind back at 81,247 miles it got a new crank, main bearings, gaskets, sealants and engine flush thanks to the oil lines bursting.  Thankfully that was covered under the warranty!!  I used dino 5W30 for the first 3000 miles, changing it out at 1000 miles, and then switching it to Mobil 1 5W30 at 83,512 miles, which it has been getting since.  How is it looking?  I'm assuming the bearings are still slowly breaking in, or that is some left over silicon from the sealant?  I'm going to change my oil at 2500 miles this time and then get the anayalsis done again.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe

Posted

Ok, here are my results, all typed out.  They said in the comments that the silicon has been cut in half since my last sample, but the bearing metals copper and lead are improved but still high.  Upper end wear looks ok.  No harmful contamination in the oil that would cause unusual wear except for the silicon.  Keep in mind the above history on my truck when looking at this.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe

 

Aluminum 3

chromium 1

Iron 16

Copper 39

Lead 39

Tin 4

Moly 57

nickel 1

manganese 0

silver 0

titanium 0

Potassium 10

Boron 10

Silicon 34

Sodium 12

Calcium 2387

Magnesium 18

Phosphorus 592

Zinc 681

Barium 0

Subviscity @ 210o 59.2

Flashpoint 375

Fuel <.5

Antifreeze 0

Water 0

Insolubles .5

Posted

The only thing I'd be worried about is;

 

Fuel <.5

Antifreeze 0

Water 0

 

Otherwise without being a chemist, I really can't say what's good and bad in the others

Posted
It seems sort of soon after a rebuild to do an analysis to me.  I would expect some bearing material and other undesireable stuff for a short while.  That's the only time I ever do low mileage oil changes.  How much does the analysis cost?  I would think they would tell you if that list of values is good or bad.
Posted

It's only 20 bucks, they said the little bit of fuel could be from excessive idling, which my truck will be doing a bit of now that its winter time.  When I spoke to them after my first sample after the rebuild they said not to be worried at all.

 

Joe

Posted

Who did you use?  I use Titan and not only do they tell the specifics like yours, but they tell you whether or not the numbers are within normal parameters for both the engine and brand/viscosity oil you use.

 

I would expect higher amounts of silicone and copper especially after a significant rebuild as yours, but in all honesty at this point I'd only be concerned about the fuel, water, antifreeze components until you get more mileage on the re-build.  That is unless something is heinously out of whack.

Posted
Do the people doing the analysis privide and kind of guide or manual that allows you to read and understand what the analysis means?   That would be like me giving a patient a sheet with their blood analysis and them not having a clue what the different values for the different cell counts indicates.
Posted
Lane, the rebuild was back at 81000 miles and the oil sample was taken at 95000 miles.  I use Blackstone Labs but I will use Titan next time, they sound a lot better.  Do you have a website?  So your saying it all looks good since the water and antifreeze are zero?
Posted

From that perspective, yes, it all looks good.  But keep in mind, without knowing what it was getting before you did the rebuild and after it's kinda hard to compare and contrast.  What you need to do is get several analysis samples and note any trends.

 

That is unless something stands out like a sore thumb...like if you have 99% copper in the oil...that's a big sign saying..."BEARINGS ARE SHOT!"  :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. The read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
    • I really appreciate the response.  I guess I was confused about torque angle vs torque angle yield.  The individual bolts don't have a warning on reuse but the part number for the LCA nuts does.   Regarding the purpose of the moog grease fittings on their bolts .. Guessing to reduce possibility of corrosion locking the cams or seizing to the bushing inserts.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...