Jump to content

Help with dual tank selector valve wiring


Recommended Posts

Posted

The work has finally begun! I dropped both fuel tanks yesterday and removed all the hoses to measure (roughly 9 feet for both) so I am halfway there. 1976 Chevy 454 big block with factory dual fuel tanks.

 

Has anyone ever replaced the OEM selector valve with one of those Pollak 6 port universal valves sold at autopart stores?

 

I broke one of the 1/4" return nipples on the selector valve (Dad wanted a new one anyway) and I am having trouble figuring out how to wire up this new selector valve I got from AutoZone. The instructions are horrible!

 

pollack-6-way.jpg

 

Here is how the OEM valve and switch are wired up. One wire goes to the selector valve. The valve grounds through the body. When the solenoid is energized it sends/recieves fuel to one tank and when de-energized it sends/recieves fuel to the other tank. The sending unit wires goto the switch and then to the fuel guage. Like this:

 

DualTankWiring.jpg

 

Using a switch that looks like this:

 

d7089c.jpg

 

 

The new selector valve has five pins on it.

6181d1278234154-fuel-changing-tank-while-truck-is-running-1994-f150-dualgasvalve.jpg

 

With this valve, based on what I can make from the directions, Pins A and C goto the sending units, B goes to the guage. So I shouldn't bother with those pins because the factory switch will take care of that.

 

So that leaves two connectors left.

 

From what I understand from the directions, it says pins D and E control the solenoid and by switching polarites will control which ports are open. With the valve "AS IS", two of the ports are already open. That that leads me to believe if I were to connect power to one pin (D or E) and ground the other (E or D), the valve should swap ports.

 

On the other hand, based on the schematic, there does not appear to be a ground connected to the connector. So perhaps the selector valve grounds through the mounting nuts like the OEM valve. And it's just a matter of connecting power to either the D or E pin to energize the selector valve.

 

I have yet to figure out which position sends power to the selector valve. I'll get out my test light to make sure.

 

While I am on the subject, there are three ports on the sending unit. 3/8" supply, 1/4" return and a 5/6" port with a 3" hose attached to it and a brownish valve of some sort at the end. Is this a redundant two way check valve to maintain atmospheric pressure in the tanks? This truck has no factory emmision other than a PVC valve so it appears the tank vent through the fuel caps. I thought about just capping these ports off with vinyl caps. Good or bad idea?

Posted

Why didn't you purchase the OEM version. It only has one wire. Cost like $55 or less. Simple switch out. Takes 15 minutes

 

fuelvalve.jpg

 

Edit: After you added the the first wiring diagram, you now know which electric ports you need to use. All you need is power and ground since the sending unit switching is handled at the selector switch. Do not cap off any tank vent lines

Posted

Why didn't you purchase the OEM version. It only has one wire. Cost like $55 or less. Simple switch out. Takes 15 minutes

 

fuelvalve.jpg

 

Edit: After you added the the first wiring diagram, you now know which electric ports you need to use. All you need is power and ground since the sending unit switching is handled at the selector switch. Do not cap off any tank vent lines

 

 

Yeah that would have been my first choice if I could find one. I didn't try NAPA being they are on the other end of town.

 

I went to three auto part stores yesterday (O'Relieys, Advance and Autozone) and the six pin model was all they could get. Hell the first two stores were out of fuel line hose and clamps! They blamed it on lawnmowing season. I blame it on poor ordering and keeping inventories low to get bonus checks.

 

I was going to check with LMC but I'd really like to wrap this project up ASAP because the truck in out in the driveway blocking off one bay of my garage.

 

I didn't want to put the truck in the garage being it needs a paintjob anyway and it's hail season.

 

I still need to know if the selector valve grounds through the mounting holes or not. In other words I'd prefer not to fry this thing if possible. I could always take it back and say I changed my mind if I were to fry it.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I ended up ordering one off Amazon.com of all place for $64 including shipping. I painted the tops of the tanks with Rustoleum while I had them out from where the mulch had been sitting on top of the sending units for so long. This truck required a total of almost 20 feet of hose!

 

I still couldn't figure out where the fuel leaks were coming from. This truck would leak fuel from somewhere then onto the exhaust pipes!

 

I inspected the old hoses for cracks but couldn't find any. The hoses looked "bad" being almost 40 years old but not that bad. Unless there was a pinhole leak I couldn't find.

 

Now only the driveshaft carrier bearing!

 

Nobody answered my post concerning that. Does the driveshaft just slide out of the transmission? Like it would on a C4 Ford?

Posted

Yes. Once you remove the carrier bearing, the drive shaft will slide back, out of the trans.

Posted

Yes. Once you remove the carrier bearing, the drive shaft will slide back, out of the trans.

 

 

Thanks.

 

I picked up a Haynes manual today at the Flea Market so hopefully I won't be asking these trival questions anymore.

  • 3 years later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,842
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    CaptainDad
    Newest Member
    CaptainDad
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 487 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...