Jump to content

Recommend subs for subthump box?


Recommended Posts

Posted

So time to retire my rockford fosgates 2 10" subs in a subthump box, looking so far at some alpines and the higher end kickers so far. Just wanted to see what anyone else might recommend for some snappy hard hitting bass so to speak. Thanks

Posted

I just put in a 500 watt alpine amp , and one JL audio 10W3V3-2. For 1 10", it hits amazing, and is extremely responsive. Best part is it barely takes up any room.

 

Heres a comparison of my old pioneer sub compared to the new jl..

 

2012-04-16_17-33-46_164.jpg

Posted

I am a big fan of Image Dynamics. I have owned the IDQv2 series and currently own the IDv3 series. Great build quality, excellent sound quality, and they wont break the bank.

Posted

Cool thanks, I only have about 6.5" of depth to play which comes into play.

Posted

Cool thanks, I only have about 6.5" of depth to play which comes into play.

 

 

I have the same box, but 1 12 inch sub. Correct, you have 6.5 inches of depth, but make sure you look at the diameter of the magnet. I ran the Alpine Type 6 12 inch DVC sub, it fits as far as depth, but it wouldn't fit because the maget/basket was enormous. I spent at least a couple hours trying to shave off some wood around the indentation around the magnet cut out. I got it to work, but it was a pain. FYI only.

 

Cool thanks, I only have about 6.5" of depth to play which comes into play.

 

 

I have the same box, but 1 12 inch sub. Correct, you have 6.5 inches of depth, but make sure you look at the diameter of the magnet. I ran the Alpine Type 6 12 inch DVC sub, it fits as far as depth, but it wouldn't fit because the maget/basket was enormous. I spent at least a couple hours trying to shave off some wood around the indentation around the magnet cut out. I got it to work, but it was a pain. FYI only.

 

 

Type R........sorry typo

Posted

cool thanks for the head up, will do the research this weekend on which ones to go with.

Posted

Well after a lot of decision making, going to go with the new Alpine sws10D4's.

Posted

It may be too late (as you may have already purchased your new subs) but look into Sundown Audio SA10's. The mounting depth is perfect for a subthump box and they sound awesome.

 

- First post!!! (I burn most of my time on DMAX forums LOL)

Posted

RE Audio SE's. I had two 12" RE SE's in my Subthump box. They wanted a bit more airspace, but if you have a 10" box, then you should go good to go. RE Audio's new revised SE's are now called the SEX's. Not sure why they named them that. They rebranded their entire new line with an X at the end like their RE's are now REX, etc... The SE's have great SQ and got loud doing it. Definitely one of my favorite subwoofers I have ever ran.

Posted

Alpines fit like a dream and sound great, but thank you for the other reccomendations. :)

Posted

Can you clarify on how well they sound? I am interested in how well the Type S's sound. What amp are you pushing them with. Good job on going with the Type S's above the Type R's. I only say this because the Type R's sound better in a ported box than a sealed box.

 

Sealed Box: Type S > Type R

Ported Box: Type S Type R (especially if tuned really low. R's get louder the lower they are tuned.)

 

The Type R's are one of my favorite subs. I had two 12's in a ported box tuned to 32hz and it was rediculously loud, had great Sound Quality and dove down low with authority.

 

This was my first true custom build I did in my Grand Am GT. I was 19 when I did this. Two Type R 12's in a ported box tuned to 32hz. I forgot how big the box was. Ran it off a JBL 1200.1 pushing 1450wrms (These amps were under rated anywhere from 1400-1520 wrms, with Alpine Type R Components powered by a Clarion APA4320 4 channel amp bridged to 160wrms x 2

 

2611_56503864412_509279412_1403856_5582580_n.jpg

 

 

I miss this car. It was an awesome car for when I was 18-20 years old. After hours after hours and days of searching for a new car, I didnt have a particular car in mind. I was just out to see what I liked, but this car caught my eye because of its paint job. From the distance I saw this dark metallic green car with the sun bouncing off metallic yellow, although you cant really see the yellow bouncing off in this picture. It was a cloudy day. I still love this color. Its a rare color that Pontiac came out with. Its called Spruce Green Metallic. This paint and Copperhead Pearl are my two favorite colors on a vehicle. I think if I were going to paint a vehicle Spruce Green Metallic, I would spice it up a bit with more yellow metallic in the paint. I also added 18" chrome wheels to this car.

 

Sorry, off topic with the car, but I just had a trip down memory lane with all of my pictures from the car lol

2611_56503854412_509279412_1403854_2224988_n.jpg

Posted

Thats cool, I get that way too sometimes. They sound good, hit nice and tight like a virgins ass lol. They're in a sealed box of course and running a old school rockford fosgate amp 1000 mono 1ch. I listen to techno/dance new age and old school music for the most part and the subs sound great. Like it was reccomended was the week or so break in period, I still have to do some minor adjusting on the amp for settings. I give them 4 stars!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
    • *Your      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...