Jump to content

Who makes greasable ball joints for NNBS?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I am looking to replace my upper and lower ball joints on my 09 Silverado. I contacted Rockauto about the Moog parts about being greasable and they can't gauruntee that they will be as Moog is transitioning to non greasable parts. Does anyone make a greasable part? Should I even care if they are greasable?

Posted

Most of the ball joints i'm seeing on rock auto for your truck are greasable. Anything with a zerk in the picture will be. Strange about the moog thing. We use them almost exclusively at my shop because of the fact that they are greasable. I don't see why they would move to being non greasable, with that being their biggest selling point.

Posted

Who wants greasable ball joints?

 

 

:nonod:

 

 

I've always found that "quality" lubed for life components to last much longer...

 

 

Greasable's are prone to contamination...

 

Most guys just can't resist to pump a squirt to many and swell the boot or they lose the rubber caps for the zerk...

 

Just my opinion and experience..

Posted

Listen to all those "squeeky" Fords out there!!

 

I used to be able to grease everything under my 2009 GMC Sierra C1500, and was shocked to see all of that had changed under my 2012 GMC Sierra C1500!!

 

I'm all for greaseable moving parts myself...

Posted

Who wants greasable ball joints?

 

 

:nonod:

 

 

I've always found that "quality" lubed for life components to last much longer...

 

 

Greasable's are prone to contamination...

 

Most guys just can't resist to pump a squirt to many and swell the boot or they lose the rubber caps for the zerk...

 

Just my opinion and experience..

 

The reason greasable units fail is really really simple...... nobody greases them in the first place. The greasable units also have bleeds on the boots so even if you overgrease them it just squirts out and doesn't rupture the boot.....

 

Take my 05..... greasable of course. In 120000 miles due to wear I have changed the passenger inner tie rod....... that's it. Now also take into account that this 05 sees lots of really poorly maintained rough ugly gravel roads day in and day out.. unlike a majority of drivers on this board.

 

The fleet of over 100 non greasable GMT900 1/2 tons front ends in the same environment are worn out at half of my miles or less.

 

Non greasable are the choice though overall because a nongreasable will outlast a greasable unit that is never greased for sure........ break out the gun ever couple thousand miles like I do though.... and good luck. I agree on contamination but if you are smart enough to grease you can also wipe the zerk off before pumping anything through it..

 

I change the 05's oil maybe once every 15000 miles or so.... but in that 15000 mile timeframe on average I grease the trucks front end about 4 times.... must be working because I don't have a worn out disaster and I am not forking over tons of parts for it.

 

Take the other two trucks in my signature however. Typical of the era and used when bought. The 04 had around 70000 miles on it when I bought it and by the shape of the body and chassis is a pure pavement truck. It's front end was shot....... everything was dry and the inner tie rods and upper balljoints were ready to fall out of it. Why?????? The dry comment..... if they had ever been greased it was many many moons ago. Truck had quick lube oil change place decals on it and obviously they weren't doing their job.

 

The 03 when bought had just over 100000 miles and its front end is all new short of the lower balljoints...... and it wasn't done recently. Once again..... no maintenance and look what mess you get. The 03 is like the 04... pure pavement truck.

Posted

I'd be wary of drilling out a non-greaseable part and adding a zerk honestly. You're not taking into account if the parts that were greaseable had additional material to add strength around the hole for the zerk and the boot would likely rupture rather than ooze out extra grease because it wasn't designed to have grease added. Other than leveling kits which may or may not be shorting the life of balljoints its not like we're seeing early failures on front end stuff so I'd think sealed should be fine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 324 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...