Jump to content

getting a Vortec?


CrohnieBoy

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have a 1995 Chevy 1500 Ext Cab.  It has the 350 in it.  Currently I have 124,000 miles and it is running fine. But... I know some day it will have to give out. Thus my question.  Should I rebuild the 350 or swap engines and get a Vortec?  Is there a "swap kit": for a 350 to a Vortec?  Thanks.
Posted
You can always rebuild the engine and get a Vortec sticker. :D The biggest difference between the engines in the '95 and the '96-'99 are the fuel delivery method (throttle body vs. mulitport) and engine management (OBD1 vs. OBD2).  The newer engines are drop-ins as long as you get a complete engine and the computer that goes along.  Other than that, you would probably have to upgrade the fuel pump to a higher pressure unit.  Unless you are talking about putting something other than a 350 in.
Posted

Also think about this... What do you use the truck for, do you hot rod it, pull trailers and such, 4wheel? The reason I ask is the TBI is more tame in the power to rpm ratio, and CPI has its power at higher rpm's. The TBI (Throttle body)-What yours has now, compared to the CPI(?)(Central port)-I think that is what the vortechs used from 96-99, the TBI has less trq and hp than the CPI does, but it isn't very much, I think maybe 10-20 for each. But the big difference is where the power is at RPM wise. For example, my 4.3L is CPI and my Bro's 4.3L is TBI, mine has 200hp at approx. 4500rpm, and 265(I think) ft-lbs. at approx. 3500rpm. My bros. has 185 hp at 2500 rpm, and 245 ft-lbs, at, I think, 2200 rpm. Like I said I am not sure of all the figures, but I know they are close. Good luck in deciding what to do.

 

Tom

Posted
I have a 1995 Chevy 1500 Ext Cab.  It has the 350 in it.  Currently I have 124,000 miles and it is running fine. But... I know some day it will have to give out.

Unless you run the crap out of it, don't count it out yet. I have almost 300k on my '89.

 

I asked a similar question not to long ago. I figured my '89 would be quitting soon also. I think you could re-build that '95 with some mod's. and see more power than the Vortec. I like the TBI better then the CPI anyway. It has a whole lot quicker throttle response on the low end.

Posted
I agree , Dont count your engine out at 124,000 miles it should go fine for many  more miles. It's the transmission I t6hink you should worry about. My previous truck was a 95 1500 4x4. The engine was still strong but the trans was getting week and I had already replaced the transfer case. I'd stay with the stock 5.7 and save my money for the new transmission.
Posted
my truck is getting close to 170, still a monster. You can EASILY get Vortec power out of your engine for around 500 bucks, I did. plus, the Vortec's can carbon up,  and my TBI hasn't even gotten close with a good deal of city driving.
Posted
Seems like we are forgetting that the fuel injection system is not the only difference between a 95 and 96 motors.  The biggest difference is probably the cylinder heads.  The cylinder heads on the TBI motors are awful compared to the Vortec cylinder heads used on the 96 and later truck motors.  These cast iron Vortec cylinder heads are very cheap and are good for around 30-40 Hp right out of the box compared to the stock heads.  If I were you I would keep your TBI setup, and when it comes time to rebuild your motor I would get a set of Vortec heads and a TBI/Vortec intake manifold from GM Performance Parts.  I can assure you that you will notice a difference....
Posted

Thank you all for your responses.

 

I agree that this engine should run for a long time.  It is still very strong with 120K+ miles on it.

 

I was just doing a little planning/dreaming. :crazy:

 

The primary use of this truck is a year round daily commuter.   I also tow a pop-up camper and 2 jet-ski's with it in the spring/summer months.  And the occasional load of lumber or drywall or mulch.

 

Again, thanks for all the responses!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,948
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    zibzer2
    Newest Member
    zibzer2
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 830 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...