Jump to content

Avalanche vs 2500HD


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 1994 GMC Sierra Z71 ext. cab with step side and am looking to get a newer vehicle.  I have had good luck with my Sierra so probably stick to GM for my next purchase.

 

I am interested in what this forum has to say about what my next vehicle purchase should be, either an Avalanche or the 2001/2002 2500HD.

 

Thanks in advance for the advice!  :jester:

Posted
....I am interested in what this forum has to say about what my next vehicle purchase should be, either an Avalanche or the 2001/2002 2500HD.

I think that you'd need to figure out just what KIND of vehicle you need----pickup, or this part SUV, part pickup.

Posted

Irymal

I would be happy with either because both come with a crew cab which is one of the features that i want.

 

The information i am interested in are the pros and cons of each vehicle.

 

I have read the reviews of these trucks but i want the down and dirty information from owners.

Posted
I think you get more of a truck with the HD for less cost. I haven't really priced them out with equal options, but I think the Avalanche is more. My HD will pull more weight, has a bigger engine, and has a full size bed without any obstructions. If you put anything tall in the bed (motorcycle, fridge, etc), that mid-gate thing is kind of a pain. Now the flip side to all that is, the Avalanche will get 16-20 mpg (compared to 11-14 mpg) and from what I here it rides really nice. It might even be shorter than an HD too, if you have any garage constraints. Like lrymal said, you need to decide for yourself if you want a truck, or more of an SUV.
Posted
It depends if you really need the ability of the 2500HD, since your considering the avy it doesn't sound like you really need the 2500HD.  I wouldn't want to get a truck that is overkill for what I needed it for, it sounds like the 2500HD would be overkill for you so I'd go with the avalanche.
Posted
I'd lean towards the HD just because I'm more truck oriented.  You have to ask yourself what your usage would be, as well as your concerns.  People or cargo?  Daily driver?  Gas mileage a concern(though on a truck or full-sized suv you're kind of throwing that out the window)
Posted

I faced the same decision when I bought the Avalanche in the fall of '01 and had the following thoughts back then.  Advantages of the Avalanche:  no need to buy bed cover, liner, etc; great ride; better mileage (2wd); shorter overall length when dealing with garages and parking; lot less expensive than Duramax/Allison that I feel is the best choice in the HD.  Advantage of HD:  Duramax/Alison; more dedicated pickup bed space; better looks; no doubts about the strength of midgate/window combination.

 

After 40K miles in the Avalanche, I like the ride, available space when needed, more compact size, 19 MPG, performance, no door dings and quicker to Zaino due to the cladding.  I don't like the piston slap of the 5.3 and the creaking from the rear window.

Posted
I think you get more of a truck with the HD for less cost. I haven't really priced them out with equal options, but I think the Avalanche is more. My HD will pull more weight, has a bigger engine, and has a full size bed without any obstructions. If you put anything tall in the bed (motorcycle, fridge, etc), that mid-gate thing is kind of a pain. Now the flip side to all that is, the Avalanche will get 16-20 mpg (compared to 11-14 mpg) and from what I here it rides really nice. It might even be shorter than an HD too, if you have any garage constraints. Like lrymal said, you need to decide for yourself if you want a truck, or more of an SUV.

I think this quote says it all...

 

If you are looking for a crewcab with decent towing capabillities, and the abillity to throw a few things in the back then the Avalanche is the way to go.

 

If you want to tow heavy loads or carry heavy loads, and if you don't care about MPG's or ride quality, then buy the HD CrewCab.

Posted

Well, for me it came down to wanting a crew cab, but not wanting the lenght of a short bed crew cab pickup.  I wouldn't be able to fit it in my underground parking at work or in the garage at home so the AVY was the best alternative.

 

As far as tow ratings, if you want the best of both worlds get a 3/4 ton avy w/ 496 cubic inches of power :jester:

Posted

Hey, thanks for the great responses. this is exactly the information i like to see.

 

I am still not totally decided.

 

I love the extra features on the Avalanche but I have driven my GMC Sierra for about 10 years now and it is hard to give up the look of the truck.

 

Thanks again.

Posted
You COULD get an Avalanche WBH (without body hardware) but the "Tupperware" makes the truck...Lovin' my Avalanche and never lookin' back... :devil:  :flag:  :nono:  :flag:  :flag:  :thumb:  :puke:  :hail:
Posted

Well, I guess I chose the best of both worlds.  I found a great used Avalanche 2500 4X4 this past weekend.

 

The 8.1L engine is great and gets better milage than my 1994 GMC Sierra Z71.

 

I guess that I still like the look of the HD trucks a little more but the Avalanche is more of a family vehicle - Side Airbags are nice to have.

 

The only problem is that the Avalanche is Blue which doesn't fit my screen name.

 

Oh well - small price to pay.

 

I am now an Avalanche owner. :thumb:

Posted
Well, I guess I chose the best of both worlds.  I found a great used Avalanche 2500 4X4 this past weekend.

 

The 8.1L engine is great and gets better milage than my 1994 GMC Sierra Z71.

 

I guess that I still like the look of the HD trucks a little more but the Avalanche is more of a family vehicle - Side Airbags are nice to have.

 

The only problem is that the Avalanche is Blue which doesn't fit my screen name.

 

Oh well - small price to pay.

 

I am now an Avalanche owner. :thumb:

Congrats on the new truck...  My buddy has a 2500 Av, but if you want all the tips and tricks for the BigBlock Av, then you'll have to check in with Gandolphxx our high performance moderator.  His 2500 Av is all modded up!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,259 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...