Jump to content

2004 - Not charging

ncc-1701
 Share

Recommended Posts

ncc-1701 New Member

ncc-1701

Posted
Posted

Hello All;

 

I have a 2004, 5.3L, about 135K.

 

Here's what I know. Relitavly new battery, tested with a meter, off: 12.43, running w/bat. light and message(1):~12.4 / running wo/bat. light or message(2) ~14.5.

 

Step son has been driving for about 5 months. It had been parked for about a year before that. He comes home last night and says the light is on (and Oh, BTW, it has been on for about 2 weeks), Now the message center display says it's not charging. I didn't test it last night because it was raining. Checked this morning and no light or message. Shut it off and checked the battery, ~12.43V. Started it up, again no light, no messsage, tested at about 14.5V. While letting the truck idle, I read a few postings on here and fiddled with the plug to make sure it was getting a good conection. Checked the connections at the battery terminals and the ground could have been tighter. So I shut it off (it had been running for about a half hour still with no light, no message, and about 13.2V on the meter. I wire brushed the terminals and tightened. Started it up and now I have the light and the 'Battery Not Charging' message again. Checked it with the meter again and it's NOT charging. I let it sit for about and hour, but it's still hot and the light and message are still there and it's definatly not charging.

 

I'll check again when it's completly cold and see if this cycle repeats.

 

Is there something that could work when it's cold and then not work when i's hot? I don't just want to replace parts for no reason if i can pin point the problem.

 

Any thoughts or suggestions?

 

Thanks,

 

Chevy Joe Enthusiast

Chevy Joe

Posted
Posted

We had a Chevy V8 sit for a year and then started using it again, for the first few weeks it was fine, then one night a 30 miinute trip killed the Alternator, We had headlights, and heater running

 

I replaced the Alternator and it was fine after that

 

There is not nuch to the Chevy charging system, everything is inside the Alternator, as long as the heavy red wire is connected to the battery and Alternator and the little plug is in that's it

 

Mine smelled a little burnt, and the windings looked funny

 

It may be heating up and then failing to charge

 

Being a Chevy guy, If its not the battery its the Alternator

 

Good Luck and let us know

 

Joe

 

PS the NCC-74656 kicks the NCC-1701's ASS .....

ncc-1701 New Member

ncc-1701

Posted
  • Author
Posted

We had a Chevy V8 sit for a year and then started using it again, for the first few weeks it was fine, then one night a 30 miinute trip killed the Alternator, We had headlights, and heater running

 

I replaced the Alternator and it was fine after that

 

There is not nuch to the Chevy charging system, everything is inside the Alternator, as long as the heavy red wire is connected to the battery and Alternator and the little plug is in that's it

 

Mine smelled a little burnt, and the windings looked funny

 

It may be heating up and then failing to charge

 

Being a Chevy guy, If its not the battery its the Alternator

 

Good Luck and let us know

 

Joe

 

PS the NCC-74656 kicks the NCC-1701's ASS .....

Joe,

 

Thanks for the reply. I'll wait until the end of the day to see if anyone else has any differing opinions before going for the alternator.

 

As for the NCC's, I couldn't agree more. I only defer to the 1701 because that got it all started (and i saw the originals before reruns), but I agree, Janeway and the crew kick ass.

sahls01gmc Senior Enthusiast

sahls01gmc

Posted
Posted (edited)

I had to look up what the heck you 2 were talking about....I'm not of that generation apparently!

 

I would get your alternator tested, and then be ready to replace it. That sounds similar to mine. It went on for a couple weeks of sometimes working and sometimes not. Since then, solid 14+ volts all day now!

 

I would also check your battery, you never know. I just had a battery with a bad cell and would cause the door chime to go off without the key! Really weird symptoms, but new battery solved all of that as well.

Edited by sahls01gmc
Chevy Joe Enthusiast

Chevy Joe

Posted
Posted

Make sure you let us know !!

 

I only say the NCC-74656 is better because of the BORG tech mod for Trans-Warp LOL :)

ncc-1701 New Member

ncc-1701

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yep, replaced the alternator in about a 45 minutes, no light, no message and guage reads ~14.2. I didn't bother with any further testing.

 

Thanks guys for your input.

 

Looks like I'm done here. Beam me up Scotty........ :D

 

  • Like 1
Chevy Joe Enthusiast

Chevy Joe

Posted
Posted

That's GREAT!!

Live Long and Prosper :)

  • 2 weeks later...
ncc-1701 New Member

ncc-1701

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hello again all,

 

Just as a follow up and an FYI:

 

Alternator still working fine with no electricial issues.

 

The FYI part is that about 2.5 - 3 months ago the engin light came on and neither Auto Zone nor O'Reilly could tell why. I still don't know why and I don't know if this is even related, but a few days after changing the alternator it went out. Who knows? ? ? Maybe a coninsidence, maybe not.

 

 

 

 

waumo1 Enthusiast

waumo1

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've never had a GM alternator last 100K without failing in some way. Been that way since my first GM with an alternator in 1969.

My 1998 K1500 alternator didn't even last 30K and the 2002 Yukon about 50K.

Edited by waumo1
  • 5 years later...
coduck1984 New Member

coduck1984

Posted
Posted
On 4/19/2015 at 5:47 PM, waumo1 said:

I've never had a GM alternator last 100K without failing in some way. Been that way since my first GM with an alternator in 1969.

My 1998 K1500 alternator didn't even last 30K and the 2002 Yukon about 50K.

my 2000 Yukon is just now going out 20yrs and 250k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...