Jump to content

What does OnStar know?


Recommended Posts

Posted

My truck lit the SES lamp yesterday afternoon, so I asked OnStar to run a diagnostic check.

 

They reported back that they found "a problem in the power-train control and management system, but that other systems would compensate for the problem.  It is OK to drive the vehicle but get to a dealer within 7 days".  I don't know if they had a trouble code or not, but if they did, they would only report their "canned speech".

 

The dealer ran diagnostics and found no power to the glow plugs.  A nut was loosely attached under the fuse panel.  Tightened it down, and problem cleared.

 

At least the OnStar check gave some confidence in that I could continue to drive the vehicle, but I guess I'd have liked more detail.

Posted

With OBDII, all they can tell at this time is what the "general" problem is.  As long as your cranking system, charging system, fuel system, and ignition system (you don't need to worry about this) all work, you could drive it till the wheels fall off with all the idiot lights on, on the dash for all anyone cares.  They just have to say that (7 days).  They figure you're not gonna run right over to the dealer to get it fixed but figure within a week you should be able too.

 

Now when OBDIII comes on board in the next 3-4 years, they will be able to give more specific info as well as report it to the proper EPA authorities if deemed necessary (say if you don't fix the problem for a month) if it's an emissions related type problem.  Another thing they'll be able to do, is monitor all vehicle parameters in real time.  I.E. speed!  They can then alert the local authorities who can then intercept you.

 

In reality, While on GM's side they may be able to do this, I can speak for the State of Illinois, that they do not have the funding for the EPA, State Police, County Police, and local Police to get all of them online with this system.  Hence, I highly doubt all the doom and gloom you're hearing about it will come true.

 

This was a similar scenario in the mid 90's when OBDII was on the platform about to be launched!  Everyone screamed about "more control to big brother" and how it'll be the death of the performance industry because it was supposed to be more stringent than OBDI.  Turns out, it was a blessing in disguise.  The more complete and inclusive parameters an OBDII PCM allows, allowed more real time data acquisition (as well as logging) that us performance enthusiasts can use to fine tune our vehicles.  When performing a mod, instead of blindly thinking it worked, with OBDII, if you threw an SES code, you knew the mod you did either A) didn't work or B) gave you sufficient info to adjust other parameters to MAKE it work.  

 

At the same time, it has made emissions testing considerably easier.  I'm not sure if you know this, but up until recently, most state's and large metro areas had adopted a test called the IM240 roller test.  It was essentially a dyno run that mimmicked everyday driving situations while at the same time sampling exhaust gasses (sniffing).  With OBDII (96+), many metro areas (Chicago included) now only use the IM240 as a backup test.  Now an OBDII scan is done into the PCM.  You pull up, they do the standard visual inspection and gas cap test, pull you forward, connect a PC to your DLC data port under the dash, 15 seconds later you pass or fail.  It checks for DTC's and for readiness monitors being all active.  I've done this already with the Camaro.  It was fantastic!  No worry about some incompetent, high school dropout, f*cking up your car on the dyno.  This almost happened to me with my Bravada (AWD).  The emissions jockey insisted on putting it on the dyno despite my repeated arguments that it's AWD and if you put it on that dyno, the State will be paying for my broken drivetrain parts.  Finally after enough screaming, the Supervisor came over and basically told the jockey that I was right, this vehicle was AWD and that it could not be roller tested.  With this new OBDII PCM test, this is all avoided.  You're in and out in less than 2 minutes total.  Before it was about 5-10 minutes per vehicle to strap it down, perform the driving test, unstrap it, get your pass paper and go.

 

I feel the OBDIII system will also turn out to be a blessing in disguise.  Of course you'll get those conspiracy theorists, you know the ones that freak out over black helicopters, complaining about Big Brother being able to watch us.  "Whatever", I say...I've got nothing to hide.

 

To sum it up, don't worry about what OnStar can know.  They do not posses the manpower or constant time to monitor every OBDII PCM on the road.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...