Jump to content

Chicago Auto Show

Blue Bowtie

By Blue Bowtie
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Blue Bowtie Enthusiast

Blue Bowtie

Posted
Posted

Hey guys/gals, I was at the Chicago Auto Show yesterday, so I thought I would post my thoughts on some of the GM trucks that I saw there!  

2003 GMC Sierra Okay, let me tell you that the restyle on the Sierra is nice!  The front end of it looks a little tougher, I think it is an improvement of the "old" style.  With the interior improvements, GM has definitely improved this truck, without a doubt.  There will be more Sierra's out on the road soon, but not because of a decrease in the sale of the...

2003 Chevy Silverado Let me tell you that when I first saw the restyle of this, I thought that the front end looked pasted on, but seeing it in person is definitely better!  The 2003 Silverado that was displayed at the auto show was the 1500 HD.  This is a nice looking truck, the front end looks a little meaner than the "old" front end.  The taillights are nice, more of the look of the Trailblazer.  I know that a lot of people seem to be disappointed in this restyle...but let me tell you, in person the truck really looks nice...I did not hear one person saying "look at that butt ugly thing" so don't worry!  GM is making definite improvements to our trucks, better interiors, more bold styling, and technological innovations.  Why would anybody want to complain about a better made truck?  My prediction...more 2003 Silverado's will be sold than the previous model year...it looks nice!

Sierra Denali Well, if I had $40,000 extra dollars, I would spend it on this truck!  The quadrasteer seems to be such a nice feature, and that 6.0 V8 under the hood is a nice benefit too!  If you want to go in style, this is the only way to go...once nice truck!

Yukon XL w/Quadrasteer I was impressed to see that GM will be offering 4 wheel steering on the Yukon XL...it is good to see.  As far as technological improvements, and innovations, GM is ahead of everybody hands down from what I saw.

Envoy/Trailblazer XL When I first saw the "extra long" versions of these vehicles, I immediately thought that it looked like a minivan...but seeing it in person is different.  These are some nice looking vehicles, and they will definitely be taking some sales away from the Explorer with the availability of the 3rd row seat.  They don't look as much like a "soccer mom" vehicle as I first thought!

Sonoma ZR5 Crew Cab This is such a nice "little" truck, the ZR5 package really makes the standard 4X4 crew cab look sporty.  It will definitely be competing with, and taking away sales from the Nissan Frontier.  I was extremely impressed with the heated leather seats offered in this truck, they are very comfortable, wish this was an option when I bought my S10!

Cadillac Escalade/EXT Okay, in my mind, I saved the best for last...if you want luxury, this is the way to go.  The standard Escalade, and the "Avalanche minus the plastic" EXT are the most comfortable vehicles that I sat in all day at the auto show.  In fact, my folks are thinking of purchasing one...but they will be waiting at least a year, I want GM to put the interior improvements that they are putting into the fullsize trucks into these.  I'm sure this will be soon, that new steering wheel from the fullsize trucks is a lot nicer looking than the old style steering wheel...audio controls are much more accessible!  

Overall, the GM display at the auto show really impressed me...it was above and beyond the best display there!  Folks, don't worry...GM is making our vehicles better all the time!  :thumbs:

 

Brandon

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted
I did not hear one person saying "look at that butt ugly thing"

 

While standing by the 2003 and 2002 (gray 1500HD) i heard about 6-8 people saying how the new style didnt look as good as the 2002.  3 of them were commenting on how "guess ill have to keep what i have"

chevy4x4trucks Senior Enthusiast

chevy4x4trucks

Posted
Posted
I did not hear one person saying "look at that butt ugly thing"

 

While standing by the 2003 and 2002 (gray 1500HD) i heard about 6-8 people saying how the new style didnt look as good as the 2002.  3 of them were commenting on how "guess ill have to keep what i have"

Really?!?!?!?!?  Ryan, when I was there I hardly saw anyone looking at it, even on saturday when there were about 3x as many people there.

 

But, what do I know, because I like it and Newbie said he'd buy me one if I stop talking about his daughter.

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted
when I was there I hardly saw anyone looking at it

 

That tells you something doesnt it?

 

So ugly it made everyone stay away

firecadet613 Enthusiast

firecadet613

Posted
Posted

Ya on Friday when I went with Jon we were the only people within 10 feet of it, I guess it says something.

 

Jon, think about it, I don't think you can stop talking about Newbie's daughter, even if you'll get a $35,000 truck out of it! :thumbs:

 

Joe

chevy4x4trucks Senior Enthusiast

chevy4x4trucks

Posted
Posted
when I was there I hardly saw anyone looking at it

 

That tells you something doesnt it?

 

So ugly it made everyone stay away

I wouldn't really say that.  I bet if we took the time to ask about 90% of the people wouldn't have even known there was a difference.  But, I guess there's no convincing you that it looks good.

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted
I guess there's no convincing you that it looks good.

 

Only way to convince me would be to throw a sheet over the whole front.  Trust me everyone i have showed the pics to (friends family gf who even seeen it up close) said it looked totally different.  No one i have showed the pic to or talked tohas liked it.  

 

Oh well at least you will be able to buy one and there wont be any constraint problems  :thumbs:

CMNTMXR81 Senior Enthusiast

CMNTMXR81

Posted
Posted

Nobody complained about it when I was there either.  It is much better in person than in pictures.  Plus if it weren't green, it'd have looked even better.

 

Two of the reasons why many people were not flocking aroud it were A) there was only that 1 truck there and it was a 1500HD...not a regular 1500 or a Z71 option package and B) It was way in the back in the corner where no foot traffic went anyway.  ####, my G/F had to ask where the Silverado was aside from the two or three 2500HD's and 3500's that were prominently displayed.  The only way it'd have been more concealed would be if the physically parked it behind Buick's big display!

 

As to the Escalade's being the most comfortable, I think I could argue that point.  Did you sit in the back of the Deville DTS?  WOW!!!  It even has your own DIGITALLY controlled climate control settings in the back.  Then there's the Seville STS with it's ROCKING sound system that hands down blows the Escalade's away.  Nothing against the Escalade's Bose system, but there's a lot more cabin in that thing to fill with sound.  The Seville's sound system is blended in with the HVAC controls and whatever else in the touch screen controlled info center.  Then the electroluminscent/3D gauges on it are the best I have yet to see on ANY automobile.

 

You know, one thing that pisses me off, is all the non-informed, automotive ignorant individuals at an autoshow.  They had an SSR up on a spinning showcase.  The G/F has had her undies "moistened" for the SSR since I showed it to her when it was a concept vehicle some two to three years ago.  I was amazed by all the people that came up to it and said "What is it?"  Or, "That's ugly!" or "Is it a p/u or a car?"  Moron's, sheer moron's!!!

Sprinter Enthusiast

Sprinter

Posted
Posted

I was there Saturday the 16th.  The '03 Siverado does look better in person than it did in the pictures.  Still not sure I like it though.  The GMC looks better.  Not may people around it.  I agree it wasn't exactly showcased like it should have been.  Just kinda parked there.

 

I've been going to the Chicago Auto Show since 1972, and this is the most crowded I've seen it so early (10:10AM).  Didn't used to be that bad until noon or 1 PM.

 

Guess I'll have to start going during the week.

CMNTMXR81 Senior Enthusiast

CMNTMXR81

Posted
Posted

The best time is during the week and as close to 10pm as possible (when they close).

 

One year I was helping our dealership there and at 10pm it was absolutely friggin awesome.  I looked at more cars from 9:30pm till they shut the lights off at about 10:30pm than I could going to the show for 4 hours on a Sunday.

 

Free room to take pictures and since there are few people there, I actually started talking to other GM reps and got the keys to a few of them to play with some stuff.  :thumbs:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...