Jump to content

Wheels to clear Icon upper control arms


Recommended Posts

Posted

A few weeks back I installed an Icon stage 2 kit on my '15 Sierra CC 4x4. I was hoping to to be able to stick with my stock wheels and run 275/60-20 Terra Grappler G2s. However, I'm having rubbing issues with this set up. Initially both the tire and clamped on wheel weight were hitting the Icon control arm on the driver's side so I switched to adhesive wheel weights and now just the tires rubs at full lock on both sides.

 

I'm going to play with the alignment a little to see if I can make the factory wheels work, but if not I will need to find some new 20" wheels for my truck. With the research I have done it looks like a 0 offset should clear no problem. My only concern with a 0 offset is the tires sticking out past the fender. I'm not sure if a +18 or +20 offset would give me enough extra clearance to work as I'm not exactly sure how much different these offsets are from stock. I feel like if I could push the wheels out about 1" per side I should get plenty of clearance on the new control arms.

 

Can someone give me guidance on what offset I should be looking for to give more clearance for the control arm without pushing the tire too far out? I don't want to spray the whole side of my truck every time I drive through a puddle. I would also be interested in wheel suggestions that are high quality and fairly conservative in style. I will likely go with black wheels if I go aftermarket.

 

31117AA0-6DD1-4C99-B953-D3869F28B697_zps

FEDC3003-4135-41CB-B11C-D280CB72FF33_zps

4389AF11-E18A-4540-B25B-29D0D3B1A6AC_zps

F37DE53B-0409-47BB-8E84-D746BEFD8A72_zps

Posted

According to the manufacturer the wheels can be 17" but need to have a max of 5" backspace. I can't recall the factory backspacing. But you could probably get some spacers and be fine.

Posted

According to the manufacturer the wheels can be 17" but need to have a max of 5" backspace. I can't recall the factory backspacing. But you could probably get some spacers and be fine.

 

I'm not really interested in running spacers. I think I will try a 20x9 wheel with +18 backspacing and see if that will give me the extra clearance I need unless I can adjust the alignment enough to clear the OEM wheels. I only rub at full lock so I don't need much. I want to stick with a 20" wheel since I already have new 275/60-20s on the truck at this moment.

Posted

It's hard to imagine that they would engineer an upper control arms that wouldn't fit with the factory wheels.....but who am i.

 

On a different note, how does their coil overs ride compared with stock? I would be interested in a comparison of icon and Fox since they are so similar. Either looks like a nice upgrade from the Ranchos.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted

It's hard to imagine that they would engineer an upper control arms that wouldn't fit with the factory wheels.....but who am i.

 

On a different note, how does their coil overs ride compared with stock? I would be interested in a comparison of icon and Fox since they are so similar. Either looks like a nice upgrade from the Ranchos.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

 

I agree regarding the engineering. According to Icon their upper control arm will the clear the factory wheel AND tire combo, but if you upsize the tires all bets are off. I went from the 275/55 stock size to a 275/60 and it rubs a little.

 

The coil overs ride good, but they are not a lot softer than the stock Z71 shocks. On small bumps you really don't notice a big difference. On the bigger stuff is where the digressive valved shocks show their stuff. Big hits that used to jar the whole truck now get absorbed well. The truck still stays pretty flat through corners and brake dive is only a little more than stock. Basically, if you want a ride that is just a little softer than stock and still gives you stock handling then the Icons are a good option.

Posted

 

I agree regarding the engineering. According to Icon their upper control arm will the clear the factory wheel AND tire combo, but if you upsize the tires all bets are off. I went from the 275/55 stock size to a 275/60 and it rubs a little.

 

The coil overs ride good, but they are not a lot softer than the stock Z71 shocks. On small bumps you really don't notice a big difference. On the bigger stuff is where the digressive valved shocks show their stuff. Big hits that used to jar the whole truck now get absorbed well. The truck still stays pretty flat through corners and brake dive is only a little more than stock. Basically, if you want a ride that is just a little softer than stock and still gives you stock handling then the Icons are a good option.

Thank you for the feedback. I am running 275/65 r20s with my level currently. One day will upgrade the upper control arms and shocks. Was hoping that the coil overs were heads above stock ride quality but at least they control tire movement better. Cognito and Fox are probably the more common setup so it is nice to see someone run Icon.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
    • Its just that it worked on 2024 trucks on this forum and my 2025 model truck, unless GM did something since that point to screw up access or Autel has a bad update. I haven't had need to use my tool since last year when I did the changes to the placard pressure settings and since then I updated the software on my Autel but have not plugged into the OBD so hard to say if I would get a surprise as well.    All I know last year when I bought the Autel I was warned to be sure to update it before I tried using the unit as they said who knows how long ago unit itself was actually manufactured as the software could be way out of date. 
    • And so you had gone through the process of registering and updating the tool and so on ?. All I can say is that on the front page as the tool fires up you go to advanced mode, then vehicle model comes up and you choose Silverado ( not the DRW or EV  since your a single rear wheel ) , then I think its choice 2 which is 07/2021 - 12/2026 ( 433mhz 13542523 ) as that is the series of tpms sensors and then go down to choice 5 which is tire type/pressure selection. Hit yes and it says to connect to OBD port and turn ignition on.    Having said this, I updated the software in my tool lately and these year range choices look different from the past due to them doing some updates it would appear and I have not connected up to the OBD port since last year so hopefully I am not in for a surprise with them screwing up the software and that it won't work on my truck anymore either.    So my question is, when you plugged into the OBD and started your truck it had that message on the Autel screen "vehicle not supported" ?. That does seem odd as tire shops would be pissed right off if hey can't use their tool on the model year after mine that in theory is supposed to be much the same truck ... unless GM did some change in the computer system to block certain things from access. 
    • Understanding and using modern scan tools is its own body of knowledge. I had little hope that would work...programming access to the BCM is probably required and that is not easy for us consumers. Expensive scan tool, GM programming subscription, online authentication, etc.   It also may be a matter of finding the right dealer to program it for you. Flashing a modern BCM might be a little too advanced for most tire shops.
    • Update for anyone following:    Installed everything as shown in diagram. Opted for 8 AWG from Battery Positive to a 50A resettable inline breaker. 8 AWG is tied into to 2x 12 AWG wires feeding a 6 way fuse bus in parallel (manufacturer’s design of what I purchased).    4 of the 6 fuses available for circuits are tied to terminal 30 of each relay. I tied a jumper from one of my spare circuits off the bus to terminal 86 of each relay. The trigger, terminal 85, was pulled from my interior by way of T-Taps from the X61A-X5 pins 10, 11, 17 and 23. This was the hardest part of the job. Even with the X61A unbolted and the X5 removed - there was VERY little wiggle room.  I added back up lights that I want to come on with my cargo lamp - but when I would check continuity between S48A-X1 pin 18 to its respective landing point on the X61A-X5 it triggers the factory relay… Instead I opted for a add-a-fuse on the passenger interior fuse panel (fuse location 10 - cargo lamp) and ran it through the boot on the driver side to my load. Did this to avoid introducing any electrical gremlins.   Note: Please check for continuity between the S48A-X1 and the X61A-X5. In my case wire colours were not the same as other’s who have posted. To do a continuity check you need a Multimeter. Completely disassemble the S48A-X1 and remove the brown face plate off the X61A-X5 by way of a flat head screwdriver - this was the only way I could get any results.   The outputs, terminal 87 of the relays, were fed into a junction box and landed at Individual studs and were labelled Aux 1-4.    At this point, all you need to do is run wire to your loads and bring them to ground. I created a negative bus in the engine bay, all my negatives land here.    For anyone having issues with all of your new aux switch lights coming on with the press of one - I noticed this only to be an issue when the battery wasn’t hooked up to my relays? No idea why, but it was quickly corrected by having my system buttoned up and functional.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...