Jump to content

Soft Shocks?


Recommended Posts

Posted

The Ranchos that come standard on a Z71... are they totally useless, it is normal for them to wear out after 5K miles? I have only 5500 miles on my '15 LTZ Z71, and almost since day 1, I've had to crawl over speed bumps so slowly it's almost embarrassing with a 4WD truck. Any faster, and the truck bounces almost uncontrollably. Haven't taken it in to the dealer for this yet... just wondering if this is normal.

Posted

I think it's just softer shocks because it's Z71. Mine does basically the same thing, but I wouldn't say is uncontrollably, just not what a stiff sports handling suspension would do. Uncontrollably to me would mean it feels like you have lowrider hydraulics on it and hitting switches. I'd rather it be soft suspension than feel like it's about to knock out feelings out of your teeth after running over a pebble. My '14 Z71 with 18s ride good to me even with the factory SR-As. I'm sure it would ride better with other tires, but my '14 currently rides a hell of a lot better than the 2 previous Chevys I've had ('86 C10 and '98 Z71).

 

By the way, why ask if they wear out in 5K miles when you say it's been doing it since day one? That would make sense if the suspension started to feel different after 5K miles, but you say it's done it since day 1 and you have 5,500 miles on the truck.

Posted

The Ranchos that come standard on a Z71... are they totally useless, it is normal for them to wear out after 5K miles? I have only 5500 miles on my '15 LTZ Z71, and almost since day 1, I've had to crawl over speed bumps so slowly it's almost embarrassing with a 4WD truck. Any faster, and the truck bounces almost uncontrollably. Haven't taken it in to the dealer for this yet... just wondering if this is normal.

There is document PI1354C at the bottom outlines that any Z71 option code shock built before A14743C 147th day of 2014 will need a dynamic test performed off the vehicle. There is free play for the first 10mm of travel instead of resistance. Replace shocks with excessive free play.

Posted

I think it's just softer shocks because it's Z71. Mine does basically the same thing, but I wouldn't say is uncontrollably, just not what a stiff sports handling suspension would do. Uncontrollably to me would mean it feels like you have lowrider hydraulics on it and hitting switches. I'd rather it be soft suspension than feel like it's about to knock out feelings out of your teeth after running over a pebble. My '14 Z71 with 18s ride good to me even with the factory SR-As. I'm sure it would ride better with other tires, but my '14 currently rides a hell of a lot better than the 2 previous Chevys I've had ('86 C10 and '98 Z71).

 

By the way, why ask if they wear out in 5K miles when you say it's been doing it since day one? That would make sense if the suspension started to feel different after 5K miles, but you say it's done it since day 1 and you have 5,500 miles on the truck.

y

 

 

The issue over the speed bumps has been going on all along. Lately, I 've noticed as well, that when I travel down an express way that has had biome bad patch work done and has "rolls to it" rather than being smooth, the truck seems to bounce to the full extent of it's suspension travel and almost seems as though it's about to lift off the pavement... not a comforting sensation.

Posted

Well something is wrong or your tire pressures are too low because my '14 Z71 with 18" rims hasn't done it nearly that bad since I got it which was 2 years and 24,000 miles ago. I get a little bounce, but not what you describe.

 

Just curious though, is this the fist Z71 you've had? If it is then maybe you're just not used to it. Like if you came from 3/4 or 1 tons or something like that.

Posted

Well something is wrong or your tire pressures are too low because my '14 Z71 with 18" rims hasn't done it nearly that bad since I got it which was 2 years and 24,000 miles ago. I get a little bounce, but not what you describe.

 

Just curious though, is this the fist Z71 you've had? If it is then maybe you're just not used to it. Like if you came from 3/4 or 1 tons or something like that.

Yup... First Z71... second 4WD.. First was an old 70's vintage beater Blazer, a long time ago. Have had a couple 2WD trucks... This is my first NICE 4WD. Maybe chalk it all up to learning experiences. I've heard a few less than flattering comments about Ranchos.

Posted

Yup... First Z71... second 4WD.. First was an old 70's vintage beater Blazer, a long time ago. Have had a couple 2WD trucks... This is my first NICE 4WD. Maybe chalk it all up to learning experiences. I've heard a few less than flattering comments about Ranchos.

 

My point was maybe since you don't seem used to softer suspension that maybe in your mind you're exaggerating. Maybe not and something really isn't right, I don't know. From what everybody on here that has Bilsteins or Fox shocks Ranchos suck compared to them, but they're not trash like some people want to think. Maybe you should consider Bilsteins or Foxs all around, at least the struts up front. Or get used to it, but after 5K miles you probably should have gotten used to them by now so consider changing the Ranchos out.

Posted

The Ranchos that come standard on a Z71... are they totally useless, it is normal for them to wear out after 5K miles? I have only 5500 miles on my '15 LTZ Z71, and almost since day 1, I've had to crawl over speed bumps so slowly it's almost embarrassing with a 4WD truck. Any faster, and the truck bounces almost uncontrollably. Haven't taken it in to the dealer for this yet... just wondering if this is normal.

Isn't that the point of speed bumps - to slow down when you go over them?

 

And don't forget that you probably have the 20" wheels which give a harsher ride.

Posted

Isn't that the point of speed bumps - to slow down when you go over them?

 

And don't forget that you probably have the 20" wheels which give a harsher ride.

The concept of speed bumps I fully understand, I'm not a child. What I don't understand is having to crawl over them as slowly as a co-worker of mine in his Porshce 911 GTS.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
    • Coming back to this question, *my* answer is no, it's not something about which I'm knowledgeable. I'd need to read up on it and understand how it applies to we the consumer and our oil change regimens.   One of your bolded points is that fresh oil in a container contains particulate matter. I don't think I'm surprised, maybe a little bit that it seems to be a major factor, but there's manufacturing process involved in oil and it doesn't exactly come in sterile packaging.    How much is filtered out on the first start by an acceptable quality filter (AC Delco, as a baseline) filter?   On the GM OLM discussion, just saying that the "number of engine revolutions" appears to be a factor in oil life... cough... maybe driving style *does* matter.    
    • GMC has been revising their trim level names over the past several years. Sierra Pro has taken over the Work Truck/SL trim name; Elevation has replaced the SLE (and with the Premium upgrade, SLT) in the SUV lineup of late; AT4/AT4 Ultimate and Denali/Denali Ultimate have been the top of the line in off road luxury and on-road luxury respectively for the full-size pickups and SUVs.    SL, SLE, SLT nomenclatures are gone in the Sierra truck line. Mark my words.
    • GMC has been revising their trim level names over the past several years. Sierra Pro has taken over the Work Truck/SL trim name; Elevation has replaced the SLE (and with the Premium upgrade, SLT) in the SUV lineup of late; AT4/AT4 Ultimate and Denali/Denali Ultimate have been the top of the line in off road luxury and on-road luxury respectively for the full-size pickups and SUVs.    SL, SLE, SLT nomenclatures are gone in the Sierra truck line. Mark my words.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...