Jump to content

paco's opinion....


pacodiablo

Recommended Posts

Posted

i just got back from a car show and decided to share my opinion on the cars....

 

Best Mid-Size SUV: TrailBlazer

Best Full-Size SUV: *TIE* 02 Escalade/03 Expedition

Best Small Truck: Dakota

Best Full-Size Truck: F-250

Best Mid-Size Car: Malibu

Best Large Car: Impala

Best Crossover: Escalade EXT

 

The not so goods....

 

Worst Full-Size Truck: Silverado (sorry guys): uncomfortable seats, ugly colors, cheap feel

 

Worst Crossover: *TIE* Avalanche/SportTrac: both had very uninviting interiors, priced way to high

 

Worst Small Truck: *TIE* Ranger/Tacoma: both had horrible interiors

 

Worst Cars: Vibe, Matrix, Rondevous, Aztek: I don't think I need to explain why I did not like these

 

Worst SUV: Wrangler: I felt like I could break it in half

 

 

Other comments:

 

The SuperCrew King Ranch edition was nice, but the saddle leather had a very bad smell

 

The new Ram is an improvement, but some parts are still cheapish and there should be more rear seat room

 

I saw a supercharged Escalade that I would have bought...if it wasn't $70,000

Posted

PACO...you a very brave man (silverado basher j/k)  :devil:

Kudos to your decision on the best full-size SUV ESCALADE (Please give more info on the 2003 ford expedition.   What is so cool?

Posted

Well, the 2003 Expedition is basically a bigger explorer.

 

I picked up what I thought was an Explorer brochure last week at the show here in Richmond. Well I get home and read it and come to find out it's the redesigned expedition.

 

It's a carmon-copy of the explorer, just bigger.

 

And what sucks the most about the 2003 Expedition, it'll be the first fullsize SUV with IRS. :devil:

Posted
And what sucks the most about the 2003 Expedition, it'll be the first fullsize SUV with IRS.

 

General, ford can keep their IRS agents.  :devil:  I don't want them.  

 

*tech question* What is IRS?

 

I thought they were just enlarging the Explorer, not redesigning the Expedition too.

Posted
*tech question* What is IRS?

 

Independent Rear Suspension

 

 

Truth be told, I don't like IFS on my trucks, so I would not even think about buying a truck with this setup.    :devil:

Posted

Yeah I dunno about that IRS stuff.  If they would really put sometime and money into developing a superior IFS and IRS system, it would be killer setup.  Look at the Humvee, it has a full independent suspension and is a great off-roading vehicle, but that is also why it cost 2-3 times the price of a truck.  But how it is now for the trucks/suvs, it just isn't worth it one bit.  Maybe one day they will figure it out someday.   ???

Posted

Best Full Size being the F-250???  What the #### are you smoking?  I think seeing things on 20+" rims has messed up your rational thought process.

Posted
I know it's probably not how it's pronounced, but that's how i hear it. :devil:

Little help here General (it's carbon copy) for future reference.

I know what you mean I used to think it was convader belt :D

 

and Paco I don't think anybody puts out cheaper interiors than ford trucks

Posted
Best Mid-Size Car: Malibu

 

OK...  I've got nothing against the Malibu, but if you think that's the best Mid-Sized Car around, I think it explains the rest of your answers too   ;)

Posted
Best Mid-Size Car: Malibu

 

OK...  I've got nothing against the Malibu, but if you think that's the best Mid-Sized Car around, I think it explains the rest of your answers too   ;)

Hey, the G/F has a Malibu.  It's actually a pretty nice little car!  Easy to service too!!

Posted

I said

I've got nothing against the Malibu

 

Even if it's a great car (and if you say it is, I believe you), you're not going to say it's the BEST midsized car are you???

Posted

i liked the malibu...it was a whole lot for the price.

 

the silverado had the cheapest interior (IMO).  the "leather" was so thin it could get a paper cut

 

the f-250 was very comfortable and didn't seem cheap to me.

 

the escalade had the best looking and feeling interior peices of all the vehicles there, the seats were very comfortable and all the controls were easy to reach and use.  my favorite vehicle there was a black customized escalade w/ 20" rims and a supercharger along with a few other goodies

Posted
i liked the malibu...it was a whole lot for the price.

 

the silverado had the cheapest interior (IMO).  the "leather" was so thin it could get a paper cut

 

the f-250 was very comfortable and didn't seem cheap to me.

 

the escalade had the best looking and feeling interior peices of all the vehicles there, the seats were very comfortable and all the controls were easy to reach and use.  my favorite vehicle there was a black customized escalade w/ 20" rims and a supercharger along with a few other goodies

My faux leather is pretty thick.  Much thicker and more durable than the real stuff in my Aurora and the Aurora has top notch leather.

 

Gauges on the Silverado are big and brite.  You don't need a telescope to see them like in the F-series, the HVAC controls are easily visable and big enough to be safely operated when wearing gloves as is the big buttons on the stereo.  Not the mess of incongruent buttons on ford's busy radio face plate.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Very interesting thread. Definitely didn’t expect to see this kind of mileage out of that engine. 
    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...