Jump to content

lane departure warning 2015 vs 2016


Caseman2

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently had the right vibrator replaced on my seat. And now it is no longer quiet. It's loud enough that the whole cab can hear it. Kinda like a cell phone on a table set on vibrate. The left side is quiet like normal.

 

I took it in. And they said it was my stuff in the little cubby next to the seat rattling. So I went in the parking lot to test this. And that was Bull.

 

I searched the dealer for a truck with the parking censors. They had none to compare it to.

 

 

The guy at the service counter is really helpful with this and is trying to make it right. Even ordered a new one for the left side. To hopefully make them at least match.

 

So. On to the question. Has anyone drove both years with seat alert? And did you notice a difference?

 

 

Thanks

Posted

I have a 16 LTZ and get no vibration in the seat with lane departure warning the parking assist does make the seat vibrate. Anybody out there with a 16 Chevy how does yours work?

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted

You can change it in the settings on the radio.

 

I can have beeps or the vibrate.

 

 

It also does the vibrate when I hit the red 4th bar on the park assist.

Posted

I have a 2015 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT with the lane departure warning feature, and 2016 Tahoe with the lane keep assist with lane departure warning feature. If this is what you are referring to, they are different features. My truck seat buzzes me whenever the camera sees a lane marker, or tar on the road, etc. I thought it was a good feature, but it became so annoying, I turned it off.

 

I didn't understand the 2016 lane keep assist with lane departure warning feature in the Tahoe, because it didn't buzz the seat like my 2015 truck, so I took it back to the dealer. They checked it out and told me that it's working perfectly. They also gave me a bulletin prepared by GM to explain the difference between lane departure warning and lane keep assist with lane departure warning. I guess they were getting a lot of complaints that the new feature wasn't working in the 2016 vehicles. Lane keep assist will actually keep the Tahoe in the lane by itself in certain conditions. I tried driving down the highway without touching the steering wheel for a mile or two and the Tahoe didn't leave the lane I was in. (Don't worry, my hands were about an inch off of the wheel while doing this.) It will buzz your seat in certain conditions if you do leave the lane. I assume that the 2016 trucks would have the keep assist feature also.

Posted

I understand that the 2016 trucks have it I just want to know if it's loud.

 

The one I had replaced is loud while the other side of the seat is silent.

Posted

I have a 16 LTZ and get no vibration in the seat with lane departure warning the parking assist does make the seat vibrate. Anybody out there with a 16 Chevy how does yours work?

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

Both systems in my 2016 LTZ are non functional, lane departure and front camera broken.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...