Headliner

By Super 8
December 4, 2016 in 1988-1999 Chevrolet & GMC C/K GMT400 Platform

Recommended Posts

Super 8

Posted December 4, 2016

Going to replace the drooping headliner on my 1992 Chev K1500 Extended Cab, thinking of the kit from LMC.

My question is, can the headliners be exchanged through the doors or does the windshield or back window have to come out?

Thanks.

azblacksheep

Posted December 5, 2016

Should be able to get it out the passenger door

Welders can weld, and fitters can fit, but the porta-can-man knows his shit.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Forum Statistics

250.6k
Total Topics

2.7m
Total Posts
Member Statistics

343,006
Total Members

8,960
Most Online

Newest Member
2022LtTbZ71
Joined 40 minutes ago
Who's Online 10 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,211 Guests (See full list)
- lowrider
- Steve-2019
- BuckWallace
- KARNUT
- 2022LtTbZ71
- Vegas22
- Prong
- newdude
- Black02Silverado
- casual

Latest Articles
- What’s New for 2027: Chevy, GMC, Buick, Cadillac
  31 minutes ago
- You Can Order a 2027 Silverado or Sierra 1500 Right Now
  Saturday at 12:31 PM
- 2027 GMC Sierra 1500 Wheel Guide: All Six Trims
  August 27
- Canada Tariffs and Your Next Silverado: What We Know
  August 27
Posts
- Service 4wd, ESC light, traction control light on, Service charging system (vehicle may stall)
  
  By 2022LtTbZ71 · Posted 37 minutes ago
  
  That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”.
- Passenger seat
  
  By jagabom (Esquire) · Posted 50 minutes ago
  
  I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
- The Peckish Synapse
  
  By OnTheReel · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.” I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
- The Peckish Synapse
  
  By Atlas · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Too much voodoo and snake oil. Time to go EV 😉
- The Peckish Synapse
  
  By Grumpy Bear · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  SwRI is who the big OEM's go to for this sort of thing. In the above the ring and bore plus valvetrain power is roughly the same for 0W30 to 0W16 but both fall apart in the 0W8. Overall the only looser is bearing friction which Stribeck told us decades ago. There is much to ponder in that reference material. That was a good find @OnTheReel
GM-Trucks.com Clubs
- Black Truck Club
  
  Open Club · 613 members
- White Truck Club
  
  Open Club · 381 members
- Canadian Owners Club
  
  Open Club · 282 members
- Red Truck Club
  
  Open Club · 158 members
- diesel 3.0
  
  Open Club · 281 members
- Texas Owner's Group
  
  Open Club · 371 members
- NorthSky Blue Club
  
  Open Club · 118 members
- Midwest Owner's Group
  
  Open Club · 213 members
- 2015 Custom Sport Club
  
  Open Club · 5 members
- GM Snow Plowing Club HD
  
  Closed Club · 14 members
Popular Contributors
- Week
- Month
- Year
- All Time
1. 1
  
  Grumpy Bear
  19
2. 2
  
  diyer2
  12
3. 3
  
  Black02Silverado
  7
4. 4
  
  newdude
  6
5. 5
  
  bruceb58
  5
Show More