Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

 

I been hearing a bad bearing noise in my front end somewhere. thought it was hub but was wrong. noticed that my drivers side axel had some decent play going into the differential as well as the oil seal leaking. So I got a new seal and carrier bearing to see if I could change them out to see if that would help/fix problem. After pulling the seal I found the tab from the auto adjuster broken off. I didn't know what to do from there and didn't allow the time to do so I put new seal on with fresh gear oil and here I am...still have problem.

 

anyone know how to go about fixing the broke adjuster thing.

 

Thanks

Posted

2006 denali xl here.

 

i did the same thing.

 

u need a new lock tab, they are cheap at local dealer.

 

unfortunatly u need to buy the special socket tool that sets the preload on the carrier.

 

i *think* there is a needle bearing in the diff case that the driverside input shaft tides through before it gets to the carrier bearing. not sure its name. i think this may be my issue because i still have the noise (only when i step on throttle) and i still have a super wobbly input shaft to the diff on the driver side as you describe. i had this before i replaced carriers and still do after.

Posted

I meant to say that I wanted to change the axel seal and needle bearing not carrier bearing. I left the old Needle bearing in and just changed the axel seal when I noticed the tab was broken. Has anyone changed the tab for the auto adjuster or know if the differential has to opened up or the process to do so?

Posted

hi there hoobie. before you crack open the front diff, make sure you have your parts on hand including enough of that yellow paint with a brush so you can set the preload. The most important thing is that you have the spanner wrench tool for this job. Otherwise you may not be able to set the preload for the bearing after you install a new one. That happened to me. I got all that way and then did not have the correct spanner tool thinking I could improvise. It maybe possible to improvise but I couldn't figure out away. I did as best I could which wasn't good enough and I now have to do the same job a second time after ordering the spanner tool from Amazon.

 

The price for this tool is effing ridiculous. My plan is to use it for my diff and then resell it to others on this forum who need the same one. If I can make half of my money back on the tool that's great, and then the next owner can resell it for the same amount and we can just mail this tool to each other as required.

 

here it is if you are in Canada. http://www.zoneoffroad.ca/tools/spanner-wrenches/yt-a08-spanner-tool-for-gm-8-25-ifs/

 

here it is if you are in the United States. https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0078U9Y3Y/ref=pd_aw_sim_sbs_263_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=EDK43E3P40RFXZNFX6B9

Posted

Tackles this last month... Changed my front diff fluid, had been making noise.. Well, it looked like antiseize pouring out.. So I watched a few videos online, ordered my bearing kit for front diff ($160) not bad. Had to get adjuster lock tab at dealer ($5).. The I went to autozone and looted their free tool catalog.. Torque wrenches, bearing pullers, bearing/seal sets, ect... Grab some RtV while your there.. Anyway, getting the diff out was a little pain but once out it only took a few hours to get everything tore down and reassembled.. Borrow a dial indicator to measure back lash and didn't use any special wrench to adjust preload, just carefully used a punch and mallet to rotate the adjusters, they have teeth on them you can tap against to rotate it.. I'm not sure what the backlash was but I believe I set it about 6-7 thousandths.. At the yoke.. And I didn't change the yoke bearing or crush sleeve. I felt they were fine and didn't want to tackle that because I didn't have a big enough impact wrench on hand.. So, it's doable, takes a day, but to change out that adjuster I'm pretty sure you gotta drop out the diff...

  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

I have the same problem going on with truck as well. I got the adjustment lock and now I don’t know what to do. How do you set the preload and set back lash on an 01 Chevy Silverado 1500? Thanks in advance. 

Edited by Billyz731
Posted (edited)

I have the same problem going on with truck as well. I got the adjustment lock and now I don’t know what to do. How do you set the preload and set back lash on an 01 Chevy Silverado 1500? Thanks in advance. 

Edited by Billyz731
  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 1/19/2017 at 1:35 PM, hoobie said:

I meant to say that I wanted to change the axel seal and needle bearing not carrier bearing. I left the old Needle bearing in and just changed the axel seal when I noticed the tab was broken. Has anyone changed the tab for the auto adjuster or know if the differential has to opened up or the process to do so?

How did u know or see if the tab was broken? My stub shaft is wobbly more than normal and already replaced needle bearing and new seal. Just started leaking again after maybe 5k miles. Any ideas? Maybe new stub shaft? Truck has 316k original miles. 4wd also works in hi and lo

  • 3 years later...
Posted

Going to do the same job. You pull the stub axle by taking out the six axle flange bolts, and slide axle out of the way. Pull the stub axle out by prying  on on side and tap on the other side while tapping on the flange. Oil seal is behind the axle, and pretty easy to remove with a large screwdriver or seal puller. Brass Timken bearing adjusting nut is behind the seal. There is a locking tab that you have to bend out to tighten axle carrier bearing. Use a church key to bend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...