Jump to content

Would you let your woman get a boob job?

The SPEEDY

By The SPEEDY
in The Off-Topic Bar

Would you let your woman get a boob job?  

161 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

JonesNTN Enthusiast

JonesNTN

Posted
Posted

Actually yes. My wife wants a reduction. I would support her if she decided to go through with it.

 

On a side note, we are getting a "Hooters" here in Jackson! :)

awdvkd Enthusiast

awdvkd

Posted
Posted

Been there done it, makes a wonderful difference if the woman is insecure about having small breast. Wish I could have afforded it a long time ago. Really made no difference to me. :)

kaspar139 Enthusiast

kaspar139

Posted
Posted

If my wife wanted a reduction because of back problems or whatever I would support it, but I would not support implants. The results are not permanent. 10-20 years down the line possible surgery again, and all that, no thanks. :)

cowboy02 Senior Enthusiast

cowboy02

Posted
Posted

The downsides are definatly there...........

 

If you wanted big jugs then you should'nt have married her right?????

 

Oh wait a minnute You love her for her personality right..... Then boobs don't matter big or small.

TROYROBO Senior Enthusiast

TROYROBO

Posted
Posted

JonesNTN--when is Hooter's comming to town-----I'm originally from Humboldt-but now i live in east tenn------ole ladie's are nice but if she wanted to do it - i would be there to support her if you know what i mean :thumbs:

sincityZ71 Senior Enthusiast

sincityZ71

Posted
Posted

I am much happier with nice small REAL breasts on a woman. I am more of a butt and leg guy anyways. Plastic on my firearms is okay, plastic on a women is nasty. :thumbs:

Larry Enthusiast

Larry

Posted
Posted

Yes, I would….but I would never pressure her into it though. Something like a boob job would have to be her personal decision. 32 perfect A is ummmm…..is not much to play with even on a 4’11 98 lb tight hottie. Small cans even have a way of affecting a female’s confidence in the society. That’s what my wife say’s anyway…I think she wants them and is reseaching the whole idea on the internet when I am not around.

 

I too am more of a butt, leg, and foot guy anyway so no biggy either way.

GnatGoSplat Enthusiast

GnatGoSplat

Posted
Posted

I'm 100% breast man. I am totally obsessed with the breast. That's all I look at, everything else I don't even care about as long as all parts are there and she's slim. That's why it's kind of a bummer the girl I fell in love with and later married isn't so well endowed on the upper half, but I try not to be so materialistic.

 

Anyway, I still would not let her get a boob job. It would look great, but not durable, and playing with them is 90% of the fun. Plus, if she did have biggins, I don't think we could ever have a serious conversation or go out in public because I'd be constantly distracted and also sportin' a permanent wood (it has a mind of its own if a big breasted slim woman is within visible range). :thumbs:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...