Jump to content

Denali headlights on SLE yukon

Abg117

By Abg117
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

Abg117 New Member

Abg117

Posted
Posted

Hello everyone, i am new to the fourms and i am sure this has been discussed before in other threads , My question is if i bought the the denali headlights will they work on my regular sle model?
I swaped my regular bulbs with LEd ones and i hate how they look and they are worst then the regular ones I can’t see shit at night.

Thanks in advance :)

 

16 yukon xl sle  

  • 11 months later...
xps800doo Enthusiast

xps800doo

Posted
Posted

get a pair of morimoto hid's from the retro fit source! put them in my 15' duramax and cant wait to upgrade the yukon!

cmatt Enthusiast

cmatt

Posted
Posted
Hello everyone, i am new to the fourms and i am sure this has been discussed before in other threads , My question is if i bought the the denali headlights will they work on my regular sle model?
I swaped my regular bulbs with LEd ones and i hate how they look and they are worst then the regular ones I can’t see shit at night.

Thanks in advance clear.png
 
16 yukon xl sle  


Do you mean the entire HID headlight assembly? They will physically fit, but won’t just plug and play. The issue is the PWM (pulse width modulation) signal on the low beam circuit. It makes the HID ballasts rapidly turn on and off.

I’ve installed them on my SLT and love them.

There are two ways to go about it:

1. Have your BCM programmed and do some wiring (move circuits at the BCM, UEC) along with adding a circuit or two in the forward lamp harness.

2. Use a custom relay harness like I did.

I should be able to make one for you. PM me. It’s been a while since I installed mine and I would need to make sure the parts can still be sourced.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Heysoos223 New Member

Heysoos223

Posted
Posted
On 12/12/2018 at 9:36 PM, cmatt said:

 


Do you mean the entire HID headlight assembly? They will physically fit, but won’t just plug and play. The issue is the PWM (pulse width modulation) signal on the low beam circuit. It makes the HID ballasts rapidly turn on and off.

I’ve installed them on my SLT and love them.

There are two ways to go about it:

1. Have your BCM programmed and do some wiring (move circuits at the BCM, UEC) along with adding a circuit or two in the forward lamp harness.

2. Use a custom relay harness like I did.

I should be able to make one for you. PM me. It’s been a while since I installed mine and I would need to make sure the parts can still be sourced.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

I’ve been thinking about doing this. I know a lot of guys use a retro fit kit, but I really want a plug and play projector for either LEDs or HIDs. Sounds like the Denali projector housing should fit right in to my SLT.. 

cmatt Enthusiast

cmatt

Posted
Posted
I’ve been thinking about doing this. I know a lot of guys use a retro fit kit, but I really want a plug and play projector for either LEDs or HIDs. Sounds like the Denali projector housing should fit right in to my SLT.. 


Yes, the headlight assemblies will swap right in. That’s exactly what I did on my SLT. A relay harness is needed so the factory HIDs will function properly.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...