Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I bought a 2019 silverado 1500 in February of 2019, theres right around 5 thousand miles on it.  Recently I have noticed a loud thumping sound in the rear end like a clunk sound when driving down alleys or uneven roads. I hear it when I back out of my driveway or pull into my yard. It sounds like a bowling ball is rolling around in my bed.  Anyways I took it to the dealership where I purchased it. They heard the sound and said there is a protocol that they have to follow.. first they clean the debris out of the leaf springs and grease them up real well. If the sound comes back which I know it will the next step is to replace the leaf springs.. Now from what I'm told and read that probably wont fix the issue either. I'm told it's just a poor design. What am I supposed to do? I'm making a big payment on a brand new truck and it sounds terrible. Why should I or anyone have to deal with this? Help me out someone!! Thanks!!

Edited by Ryan123
Change a word
Posted

Welcome!

 

First off, not sure the HD section of the forum is the right spot for a 1500 issue.

 

Second.  Is your truck a NEW body style 2019?  Or an OLD body style 2019, aka "Silverado LD"?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I didn't realise this was the HD forum. But I'm sure theres alot of knowledge on here HD or not someone will have an idea! GM is currently working on a bulletin to repair it. There saying it's the leaf springs making the sound! The answer I'm getting is it's a poor design.. who knows! It's a 2019 new body style 1500 

Posted

Check the flange on the yoke of the driveshaft.  We have had one truck that the weight on the flange broke and caused a vibration.

 

  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)

I just started having this same problem on my 19 trail boss Silverado. And I wouldn’t drive it I had it towed to dealer I only have 19000kms on it and they told me it’s normal I took videos and documented everything. In mine it feels like something to do with the automatic rear locker.

Edited by Hoftyzerk7
Forgot a part
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hey Ryan my names Nick.  I have a 2019 Silverado I purchased used.  We just heard this same noise last night while backing out of driveway and turning out of neighborhood.  Initially we thought the kids left a ball or something in bed of truck and it was rolling around.  Did the GM dealer you brought it too give you a bulletin number or anything?

  • 7 months later...
Posted

I am currently dealing with this issue on my 19 Silverado LD with 13,600 miles on it and it’s been in and out of service for the last three weeks. Leaf springs replaced twice and the rubber bushings installed, still having the issue. Got told by the dealership they won’t keep guessing what the problem is and throwing parts at it and that’s it’s a normal noise and it’s a truck that their all noisy. 

Posted

I have a 2019 Silverado LT Trail Boss - about 24K miles and hearing similar sounds; only at low speeds, in and out of driveway, etc.  Haven't taken it to dealer for this sound yet, but checking suspension components and mine seems to be the spare tire making the noise.  When under the truck and pushing up on the spare tire, hearing similar/same noise...

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I experienced the same noise. Had it in and out of the dealership several times. Picked it up today with a spacer inserted into the back of the leaf springs. See photo. Dealer says that this eliminated the noise. Chevy says that it's a known problem with the Colorado. I have a Silverado 1500 - 2018. 

92LlhSxrQBOiwXJJoG%ICQ.jpg

F4r57tz3RB+WLP388Wg4fA.jpg

  • 8 months later...
Posted

2019 Trailboss. Same exact issue, brought to dealer. Changed Leaf Springs and noice is still there! Just like everyone else. Such bull

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I know this is an old thread, but my 2019 does the same thing. I had a 2017 that was doing the same thing, and actually fixed it before it was totaled out. What is happening is the leaf springs are shifting from left to right and causing the noises. My 2017 did not have the little brackets with rubber on them on the end of the lower spring, but my 2019 did, so I figured that it would not be an issue...but it is.

 

My fix was that I put two long U-bolts on both sides of the axle on the leaf springs. I didn't put a whole lot of tension on the bolts, just enough so that they wouldn't back out and still allow them to flex. This completely eliminated the problem and it was a pretty simple fix. I wish I had a picture to show but I guess I never took one.

 

So, if you are really wanting to get rid of the clunk, it is a fairly simple $30 fix. Might have to do it on my 2019 now also.

Posted
On 10/29/2020 at 5:10 PM, Chief 1523 said:

I experienced the same noise. Had it in and out of the dealership several times. Picked it up today with a spacer inserted into the back of the leaf springs. See photo. Dealer says that this eliminated the noise. Chevy says that it's a known problem with the Colorado. I have a Silverado 1500 - 2018. 

92LlhSxrQBOiwXJJoG%ICQ.jpg

F4r57tz3RB+WLP388Wg4fA.jpg

I had the same issue on my 2019 LD. This "repair" is what my dealer did and it fixed mine. No clunk now. I am concerned they seem to have removed the rear spring clip. Otherwise I'm happy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 534 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...