Jump to content

Vote to Keep or Kill the "musics" thread


MiSdIrEcTeD_1

Keep or Kill?  

36 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Might as well, I get good ideas on what songs to get from looking at that post....and it doesn't hurt bumping my total post count up a little every once in a while.

Posted

:cool: KILL IT :lol:

 

Never clicked on it when it was first started and there is no way I'm going to look through a 1000+ post thread :jester:

 

Now if I could find a thread about what music people like :rolleyes:

Posted

I like it too. It gives me ideas for songs my band can cover, and also sparks my interest sometimes in stuff I have heard, causing me to find those songs. Sometimes I like'em sometimes I don't. And hopefully when I post on there it does the same for other people. To me it's all about spreading the music.

Posted

I've been wanting to see that thing go for quite some time now.

 

 

How bout a compromisse? The current thread gets closed, and those who want to keep it alive, start a new one.

 

 

 

agreed?

Posted
How bout a compromisse? The current thread gets closed, and those who want to keep it alive, start a new one.

What does that accomplish exactly? Then there will just be two of them, albeit one will be locked, but there will just be two of the same threads.

Posted
How bout a compromisse? The current thread gets closed,  and those who want  to keep it alive,  start a new one.

What does that accomplish exactly? Then there will just be two of them, albeit one will be locked, but there will just be two of the same threads.

I guess I should have explained my reasons fr wanting it gone. :rolleyes:

 

 

I enjoy the music thread myself, but there's WAAAAYYY too many poststo be on one thread. I thought it wuld ease the hasssle of looking through 70 pages.

Posted

I just don't reads the ones I'm not interested in. I don't asked to have them closed. I agree with Tom, no one HAS to read it.

Posted
How bout a compromisse? The current thread gets closed,  and those who want  to keep it alive,  start a new one.

What does that accomplish exactly? Then there will just be two of them, albeit one will be locked, but there will just be two of the same threads.

I guess I should have explained my reasons fr wanting it gone. :rolleyes:

 

 

I enjoy the music thread myself, but there's WAAAAYYY too many poststo be on one thread. I thought it wuld ease the hasssle of looking through 70 pages.

Given time the new thread will also be exceedingly long as well so you might as well just keep the one thread.

 

Like Tom said, no one has to read it, but then again i wouldn't want to. In my opinion it is a waste of space and it just encourages post whoring much like a word association thread.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...