Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am really wanting to get the AVS tail light covers for my LT Trailboss instead of tinting them, but want to make sure the running and brake light shows through. The website says “off-road use only” so I want to make sure they are not opaque black. I’ve only seen pictures of them on vehicles that are turned off. If anyone knows or has pictures of them with the tail light running light on and a picture of them with the brake pressed, that would be awesome.

 

thanks!

Posted
13 minutes ago, NCD said:

I am really wanting to get the AVS tail light covers for my LT Trailboss instead of tinting them, but want to make sure the running and brake light shows through. The website says “off-road use only” so I want to make sure they are not opaque black. I’ve only seen pictures of them on vehicles that are turned off. If anyone knows or has pictures of them with the tail light running light on and a picture of them with the brake pressed, that would be awesome.

 

thanks!

I run them. They shine through just fine. 

Posted

A local guy in town has them on his AT4. I’m not a fan but to answer your questions you can see the lights fine


Ryan B.

Posted
15 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

A local guy in town has them on his AT4. I’m not a fan but to answer your questions you can see the lights fine


Ryan B.

He must have them tinted because I can't find anyone who makes them.   Lund makes them for the Silverado and the sierra limited. But not the new body style

Posted
He must have them tinted because I can't find anyone who makes them.   Lund makes them for the Silverado and the sierra limited. But not the new body style


His save AVS on them. Next time I see his truck I’ll take a pic


Ryan B.
Posted
58 minutes ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


His save AVS on them. Next time I see his truck I’ll take a pic


Ryan B.

 

Cool. Thank you very much. Their not showing on the web site. Maybe I'll inquire about them 

Posted
13 hours ago, Dougie86 said:

Cool. Thank you very much. Their not showing on the web site. Maybe I'll inquire about them 

Yes they are avs taillight covers. Go check www.summitracing.com

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, michael betz said:

Yes they are avs taillight covers. Go check www.summitracing.com

I just checked and still can not find them for the new body style gmc Sierra's.  I've email avs 3 times and they've told me not at this moment but keep checking back.  I emailed again, just waiting on a response. 

Edited by Dougie86
Posted
36 minutes ago, Ajayen said:

Those are for the Silverado. My argument is for the 2019 GMC sierra. According to RyanbabZ71 he has seen them on an AT4, which is a GMC sierra. I have not been able to find them online for the 2019 GMC sierra.  According to avs they do not make them yet for the 2019 GMC sierra. I would really love to get them for my 2019 GMC sierra. I already know that they make them for the 2019 Silverado. But again I am look for the taillight covers for the "2019 GMC Sierra".   Thank you.  .......did I mention 2019 GMC sierra yet.....

Posted
Those are for the Silverado. My argument is for the 2019 GMC sierra. According to RyanbabZ71 he has seen them on an AT4, which is a GMC sierra. I have not been able to find them online for the 2019 GMC sierra.  According to avs they do not make them yet for the 2019 GMC sierra. I would really love to get them for my 2019 GMC sierra. I already know that they make them for the 2019 Silverado. But again I am look for the taillight covers for the "2019 GMC Sierra".   Thank you.  .......did I mention 2019 GMC sierra yet.....

Was just trying to help. Good luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Ajayen said:


Was just trying to help. Good luck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I totally apologize. I am just getting the impression that everybody thinks that I am looking for covers for the Silverado but that isn't the case which is frustrating when I specified the sierra.  Didn't mean to lash out at you. Just want to make myself clear.  I am really hoping RyanbabZ71 can get me that picture so I'll know if they exist or not.   Thank you for the help. 

Edited by Dougie86
Posted
I totally apologize. I am just getting the impression that everybody thinks that I am looking for covers for the Silverado but that isn't the case which is frustrating when I specified the sierra.  Didn't mean to lash out at you. Just want to make myself clear.  I am really hoping RyanbabZ71 can get me that picture so I'll know if they exist or not.   Thank you for the help. 


I haven’t seen him out and about. It’s been a few days but he was going the other way and before this topic was created. I will keep my eyes open. He has a satin steel double cab AT4


Ryan B.
Posted
13 hours ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

 


I haven’t seen him out and about. It’s been a few days but he was going the other way and before this topic was created. I will keep my eyes open. He has a satin steel double cab AT4


Ryan B.

 

This is what avs replied with.  I know alot of people getting them tinted themself. 

20200302_120902.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...