Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So I bought the truck. Didn’t notice the speed was off by 10 until I got onto the interstate, and people passing me. I checked tire sizes, all factory sizes, hooked up my scanner and oddly enough the speed on OBD2 scanner read the same as the speedo. So after checking and verifying tire size was correct, and checking seeing that it was being sent via OBD false as well I am stumped. At 60 I’m going 48-50+/-, and at 85 it’s really going 75 +/-. What’s your observations? It’s on a 2011 GMC Sierra Cree Cab 4wd, all auto. In the photos I was going what was supposed to be 40 and it shows 50 on speedo, and on GPS it shows 45. So it’s + or - 5-10 at low speeds and at 75 it will show 85. What do y’all think. I’m retired ASE Master engine tech and can work on these but I was in the diesel industry. So while working on vehicles are nothing new. This speed has me stumped. I don’t want to take it to dealer if it’s the VSS on the rear of tail housing near transfer case, and I’ve also heard of a VSS Buffer? Someone elaborate a little on whether it could be related to that. There’s a ABS light flashing on OBD scanner but no active codes. 

41AC1D04-A34B-49E4-99F4-4ED9EA3509DE.png

1CD441F0-1C53-4E94-AF51-FCED3333E87F.jpeg

Edited by Lawman86
Posted

I'd think you're truck has been tuned for a different size tire. PO removed the tires and put stock back on

Posted
1 minute ago, txab said:

I'd think you're truck has been tuned for a different size tire. PO removed the tires and put stock back on

Somethings up too. I just realized this had the 6 speed. After looking at the RPO codes. I guess I’ll take it to the dealer to have them calibrate it back to the original tire size. It’s either that or the VSS on the trans is off. 

Posted
On 6/20/2021 at 11:21 AM, txab said:

I'd think you're truck has been tuned for a different size tire. PO removed the tires and put stock back on

Here’s what puzzling to me, when the truck is in gear, with the foot on the brake the needle is above zero. My Denali you can put it in gear and it won’t move anywhere above zero unless you’re going 2-3 mph, and is steady all the way. This one here shoots us like a rocket on the interstate. Here’s a pic of it on the interstate today (this is after I put in a VSS in the trans), and going 75. It’s showing 85 on speedo so it’s + or - 10 off depending on road conditions, and the needle goes above zero before you even move. When it’s in park it’s well below zero. 

8F3CB86D-AEDC-4A94-A0D6-0D2573299704.jpeg

DEA38547-83FB-44E7-8DBB-58E1C898F50A.png

4EC58B78-0C9F-4894-B1C0-D38934B252A8.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 798 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...