Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anybody have this kit installed for a while now and experienced any issues?  I know 3.5” is pushing the limits of the cv axle, but reviews seem to be good.  However, most of those reviews I’ve seen on forums were within a month or 2 of installing.  

Posted

I had it installed today on my 2021 High Country after reading positive reviews.  I ordered it from rough country and had it installed at a local shop, not through an off road shop that was pushing it and they had positive things to say about rough country products they have used in the past despite the usual hate they receive.  
 

Good luck in making your decision.

CF718E7A-1D04-4F58-A4DC-B73E45548CB7.jpeg

Posted
28 minutes ago, aggiegold said:

I had it installed today on my 2021 High Country after reading positive reviews.  I ordered it from rough country and had it installed at a local shop, not through an off road shop that was pushing it and they had positive things to say about rough country products they have used in the past despite the usual hate they receive.  
 

Good luck in making your decision.

CF718E7A-1D04-4F58-A4DC-B73E45548CB7.jpeg

Looks good!  Did you go with the strut assemblies or the spacers?

Posted

The ride is great.  We took a trip in it this weekend and my wife commented on how smooth the truck is.  My last truck, a 2019 F150 4x4, my 12 year old would get car sick in always, he was just fine this weekend.  If you chose to do this, you’ll be happy with it!

Posted (edited)

It goes something like this in regards to that kit. 

 

They give you UCA's and spacers.

 

Putting 3.5" spacers on stock suspension is just dumb without compensating for the changes in geometry. You are putting so much undue stress on the tie rods, sway bar end links, CV axles, lower control arms etc. that your front end components are all going to wear out extremely quick. Now if you like disassembling your entire front end every six months and going down to auto zone, pressing out ball joints and changing CV axles, putting some BS Autozone components on there, sure looks like a great kit. For everyone else, you are inevitably going to wear out your OEM components insanely quick. A proper lift would give you the necessary spacers, adapters and components to compensate for all these changes in geometry. Look at The Zone or BDS for a proper 4" lift. 

 

Secondly, Those are crappy UCA's. Any good aftermarket UCA is going to be a uni-ball. Bet those joints wear out and start squeaking within 3 years. 

 

All in all, looks like a $600 way to have your entire front end squealing like pig in a matter of 6-24 months. Nobody who knows what they are looking at or talking about would buy that lift, not because of how $hitty they know Rough Country to be, but moreso because of how it's designed. Notice how no other brand sells a kit with 3.5" spacers that doesn't compensate for those changes in geometry? Only Rough Country. And before anyone chimes in otherwise, UCA's only control the angle of the steering knuckle which will allow you to get it aligned close to spec, but doesn't account for the changes in CV axles, tie rod ends, sway bar end links and lower control arm ball joints. I would expect someone to have to replace every single one at least once over time with that kit. 

 

Best of luck saving a couple hundred bucks, to properly ruin your 60k vehicle's front end real quick. 

 

Here is a proper lift that does all of the aforementioned: 

 

Proper 4" Lift

 

All lifts are POS because you are changing the engineering that these manufacturers spent Billions of dollars in R&D to perfect, but there are levels to how big of POS. FWIW I put on a 2" top mount spacer and called it a day. With 35's it looks like a million bucks, you don't have two feet of wheel well exposed, doesn't affect the ride quality and you aren't going to wear out your components like clockwork. 

 

All my opinion, but it's also FACTS. 

Edited by DustSierra
Posted
31 minutes ago, DustSierra said:

It goes something like this in regards to that kit. 

 

They give you UCA's and spacers.

 

Putting 3.5" spacers on stock suspension is just dumb without compensating for the changes in geometry. You are putting so much undue stress on the tie rods, sway bar end links, CV axles, lower control arms etc. that your front end components are all going to wear out extremely quick. Now if you like disassembling your entire front end every six months and going down to auto zone, pressing out ball joints and changing CV axles, putting some BS Autozone components on there, sure looks like a great kit. For everyone else, you are inevitably going to wear out your OEM components insanely quick. A proper lift would give you the necessary spacers, adapters and components to compensate for all these changes in geometry. Look at The Zone or BDS for a proper 4" lift. 

 

Secondly, Those are crappy UCA's. Any good aftermarket UCA is going to be a uni-ball. Bet those joints wear out and start squeaking within 3 years. 

 

All in all, looks like a $600 way to have your entire front end squealing like pig in a matter of 6-24 months. Nobody who knows what they are looking at or talking about would buy that lift, not because of how $hitty they know Rough Country to be, but moreso because of how it's designed. Notice how no other brand sells a kit with 3.5" spacers that doesn't compensate for those changes in geometry? Only Rough Country. And before anyone chimes in otherwise, UCA's only control the angle of the steering knuckle which will allow you to get it aligned close to spec, but doesn't account for the changes in CV axles, tie rod ends, sway bar end links and lower control arm ball joints. I would expect someone to have to replace every single one at least once over time with that kit. 

 

Best of luck saving a couple hundred bucks, to properly ruin your 60k vehicle's front end real quick. 

 

Here is a proper lift that does all of the aforementioned: 

 

Proper 4" Lift

 

All lifts are POS because you are changing the engineering that these manufacturers spent Billions of dollars in R&D to perfect, but there are levels to how big of POS. FWIW I put on a 2" top mount spacer and called it a day. With 35's it looks like a million bucks, you don't have two feet of wheel well exposed, doesn't affect the ride quality and you aren't going to wear out your components like clockwork. 

 

All my opinion, but it's also FACTS. 

Thanks for the response.  All the things you said are the concerns I have based on what I know and have read.  That’s why I started this thread.  I have read several good things about the lift but none were after long term use.  Rough Country isn’t the only one offering this type of lift though.  There are several other brands that sell kits that are 3” that essentially have the same components.  If I were to do this lift I was going to do the coil over option they offer.  BDS, which is spoken well of, offers a 3.5 “ coil over kit with the same components and no diff drop.  Is that a bad option too?  If not, what’s the difference?  
 

Side note, which 2” level did you go with?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Browtine said:

Thanks for the response.  All the things you said are the concerns I have based on what I know and have read.  That’s why I started this thread.  I have read several good things about the lift but none were after long term use.  Rough Country isn’t the only one offering this type of lift though.  There are several other brands that sell kits that are 3” that essentially have the same components.  If I were to do this lift I was going to do the coil over option they offer.  BDS, which is spoken well of, offers a 3.5 “ coil over kit with the same components and no diff drop.  Is that a bad option too?  If not, what’s the difference?  
 

Side note, which 2” level did you go with?

 

 

Responding to you in two different threads so I'll just leave it all here.

 

Any time you run over 3" of lift without CV axle adapters, differential drop, extended end links etc. you are going to run into problems. Maybe not a week later, maybe not even 6 months later but all those joints are going to be squealing in a matter of time and all those boots are going to rip eventually. They weren't made for that angle or to be put under that stress. Period. And even if you do run all of those things to compensate, you are still essentially running some bootleg angles (no pun intended) that minimal R&D went into. You think The Zone, Rough Country, etc. spent as much in R&D on each one of their kits as GM did? They make lifts for hundred's of different types of trucks lol. All those guys on here with 6" lifts, if they were keeping it 100, guarantee their suspension sounds like squeaking metal anytime they hit anything, if not at all times. They have essentially taken a Billion dollars of R&D and jerryrigged together a new suspension by bolting on a bunch of metal to the original suspension in an effort to get an extra 6" out of it. And that's with the differential drop, extended CV's, etc. Think a $hitty erector set.

 

Like I said earlier, if you just change the Struts/springs or Coilovers and add new UCA's you're not changing anything but the angle of the steering knuckle. The end links are going to fail, the lower ball joints, upper ball joints are going to fail, etc. You are essentially making your entire suspension Uber-fragile and installing crappily made UCA's that have a better angle. Any aftermarket UCA that is not a Heim joint Uni-ball is a POS. I paid good money for my truck not to sound like a heap. But hey, to each his own. If you have to have that extra inch and a half, which is negligible to 99.9% of people looking at your truck, that's a personal decision. But again, been around lifted vehicles for a long time and these trucks are essentially "too nice" to do that to.

 

You complain about the struts/coils essentially being soft. That is because 99.9% of the soccer moms that buy these vehicles, that is the ride that they prefer. Unless you rock crawl or are hitting Baja every weekend, you do too, you likely just don't know it. People that like the "truck feel" or the "planted feel" are just justifying their purchase. Don't hit a pothole, stay off roads that have bumps, etc. and you'll be much better off the other 99.9% of the time. Nothings perfect. The problem lies in the aftermarket suspension companies, Fox, Icon, Bilstein, are essentially all making stuff engineered for Off-Road use. The struts are designed to not articulate too much so that when you are off roading over rocks and bumps at higher speeds that you won't bottom out. Hence the struts/coils are all stiff as $hit. You would think there would be a happy middle ground but there really isn't. Even compression adjustable shocks are a lot stiffer than the stock Ranchos. 

 

You gonna fugger up your truck for an inch and a half? Not me. But look at all the folks on here with 4"+ lifts. It's like the bolton Walmart starter kit. Get your bug deflector, front license plate, chrome stick on door handles, sissy steps, etc. while you're at it. To answer your question I bought the 2" Motofab leveling kit, but any 2" kit is going to do the same thing. You could drill out two hockey pucks if you wanted to. And even that is going to put some level of undue stress on your suspension but not even one iota close to anything over 3". 

 

These are expensive vehicles, with quality components. Never understood why people would want to replace quality with crap, but I've also never understood other people. If you are interested in quality, "stance your vehicle" instead of lifting it. The difference b/w a 2" lift with 35's and a 4" lift with 35's s going to be unnoticeable to everyone but you. 2" lift looks better in a different way because the wheel wells are more filled out anyway. If you really want it to look aggressive, throw on some 1.5" spacers (which do wear out the wheel bearings over time) and tint your windows. That's about the only thing you can do to improve these trucks along with some AMP research steps (for the non-Denali owners), a supercharger, catch can and headers. The rest of this stuff is crap IMO. 

 

Good luck. 

 

I mean if you're gonna lift your truck with quality components here is a good kit for $4500 (with Torsion bars) +($2000) adjustable coilovers. Even then you are running blocks in the rear which is crap for what amounts to a $6500 kit. IDK man, every inch is a give and take. IMO you either go all out with something like a 7" long travel McGaughy's (which doesn't exist yet for this gen) and 37's and have a quality machine for an extra $15-20k or you keep it close to stock. Otherwise you're simply degrading the machine for a couple inches. But I guess everyone looks at it different. Just telling you the other side of the coin. TIFWIW.

 

6" BDS Lift Kit

Edited by DustSierra
Posted
1 hour ago, DustSierra said:

 

 

Responding to you in two different threads so I'll just leave it all here.

 

Any time you run over 3" of lift without CV axle adapters, differential drop, extended end links etc. you are going to run into problems. Maybe not a week later, maybe not even 6 months later but all those joints are going to be squealing in a matter of time and all those boots are going to rip eventually. They weren't made for that angle or to be put under that stress. Period. And even if you do run all of those things to compensate, you are still essentially running some bootleg angles (no pun intended) that minimal R&D went into. You think The Zone, Rough Country, etc. spent as much in R&D on each one of their kits as GM did? They make lifts for hundred's of different types of trucks lol. All those guys on here with 6" lifts, if they were keeping it 100, guarantee their suspension sounds like squeaking metal anytime they hit anything, if not at all times. They have essentially taken a Billion dollars of R&D and jerryrigged together a new suspension by bolting on a bunch of metal to the original suspension in an effort to get an extra 6" out of it. And that's with the differential drop, extended CV's, etc. Think a $hitty erector set.

 

Like I said earlier, if you just change the Struts/springs or Coilovers and add new UCA's you're not changing anything but the angle of the steering knuckle. The end links are going to fail, the lower ball joints, upper ball joints are going to fail, etc. You are essentially making your entire suspension Uber-fragile and installing crappily made UCA's that have a better angle. Any aftermarket UCA that is not a Heim joint Uni-ball is a POS. I paid good money for my truck not to sound like a heap. But hey, to each his own. If you have to have that extra inch and a half, which is negligible to 99.9% of people looking at your truck, that's a personal decision. But again, been around lifted vehicles for a long time and these trucks are essentially "too nice" to do that to.

 

You complain about the struts/coils essentially being soft. That is because 99.9% of the soccer moms that buy these vehicles, that is the ride that they prefer. Unless you rock crawl or are hitting Baja every weekend, you do too, you likely just don't know it. People that like the "truck feel" or the "planted feel" are just justifying their purchase. Don't hit a pothole, stay off roads that have bumps, etc. and you'll be much better off the other 99.9% of the time. Nothings perfect. The problem lies in the aftermarket suspension companies, Fox, Icon, Bilstein, are essentially all making stuff engineered for Off-Road use. The struts are designed to not articulate too much so that when you are off roading over rocks and bumps at higher speeds that you won't bottom out. Hence the struts/coils are all stiff as $hit. You would think there would be a happy middle ground but there really isn't. Even compression adjustable shocks are a lot stiffer than the stock Ranchos. 

 

You gonna fugger up your truck for an inch and a half? Not me. But look at all the folks on here with 4"+ lifts. It's like the bolton Walmart starter kit. Get your bug deflector, front license plate, chrome stick on door handles, sissy steps, etc. while you're at it. To answer your question I bought the 2" Motofab leveling kit, but any 2" kit is going to do the same thing. You could drill out two hockey pucks if you wanted to. And even that is going to put some level of undue stress on your suspension but not even one iota close to anything over 3". 

 

These are expensive vehicles, with quality components. Never understood why people would want to replace quality with crap, but I've also never understood other people. If you are interested in quality, "stance your vehicle" instead of lifting it. The difference b/w a 2" lift with 35's and a 4" lift with 35's s going to be unnoticeable to everyone but you. 2" lift looks better in a different way because the wheel wells are more filled out anyway. If you really want it to look aggressive, throw on some 1.5" spacers (which do wear out the wheel bearings over time) and tint your windows. That's about the only thing you can do to improve these trucks along with some AMP research steps (for the non-Denali owners), a supercharger, catch can and headers. The rest of this stuff is crap IMO. 

 

Good luck. 

 

I mean if you're gonna lift your truck with quality components here is a good kit for $4500 (with Torsion bars) +($2000) adjustable coilovers. Even then you are running blocks in the rear which is crap for what amounts to a $6500 kit. IDK man, every inch is a give and take. IMO you either go all out with something like a 7" long travel McGaughy's (which doesn't exist yet for this gen) and 37's and have a quality machine for an extra $15-20k or you keep it close to stock. Otherwise you're simply degrading the machine for a couple inches. But I guess everyone looks at it different. Just telling you the other side of the coin. TIFWIW.

 

6" BDS Lift Kit

Thanks for the input.  I appreciate you taking the time to respond.  Just so you understand where I’m coming from, I’m not set on a lift and don’t necessarily need or want it.  I started down this path bc my truck came leveled with a 2.25” level kit and I notice I’m a tad nose high, which I hate.  So I was looking at putting 1”blocks in the rear to help that.  I also considered removing the lower portion of my level which would make it 1.5” lift in front, but I really don’t want to lower the front.  I also think the ride isn’t the best, which is why I considered the bilsteins. I thought they may improve the ride and provide similar lift in the front.  Bilsteins are not in stock anywhere.  When I saw the 3.5” RC Lift I thought it might provide what i was looking for but had concerns about that much lift and what it would do to the front end geometries.  My concerns were all the stuff you mentioned, which is why I started this thread.  Im not sure what the best option is for me.  I could lower the front to the 1.5” lift but that’s not preferred.  I could add the 1” rear block, but that won’t help my ride.  I may try a 2” leveling coil over with or without the 1” block.  

Posted

I’ve had mine installed for 7 months today, and about 12,000 miles.  Nothing crazy wrong. Ride is definitely stiffer, but that’s to be expected.  I’m also running the RC 2” spacers, so I know I’m putting stress on stuff all over the front end. It hasn’t given me any issues yet.  I’ll be interested what happens in another 10-15k miles when it’s time for tires.

E52FA7AC-A93B-42B8-B65A-B72E95E60567.png

9E5A9D49-7902-4E51-8B1A-532F85742020.png

Posted
13 hours ago, fluxcapacitor11 said:

I’ve had mine installed for 7 months today, and about 12,000 miles.  Nothing crazy wrong. Ride is definitely stiffer, but that’s to be expected.  I’m also running the RC 2” spacers, so I know I’m putting stress on stuff all over the front end. It hasn’t given me any issues yet.  I’ll be interested what happens in another 10-15k miles when it’s time for tires.

E52FA7AC-A93B-42B8-B65A-B72E95E60567.png

9E5A9D49-7902-4E51-8B1A-532F85742020.png

Man, that looks great.  Thanks for sharing.  I’m still on the fence what I want to do. I like the look of the 3-3.5” lift 

Posted
On 11/3/2021 at 9:59 PM, aggiegold said:

I had it installed today on my 2021 High Country after reading positive reviews.  I ordered it from rough country and had it installed at a local shop, not through an off road shop that was pushing it and they had positive things to say about rough country products they have used in the past despite the usual hate they receive.  
 

Good luck in making your decision.

CF718E7A-1D04-4F58-A4DC-B73E45548CB7.jpeg

Looks really nice brother. Just curious, what size are those tires? I just bought the same kit but with the lifted struts. My Silverado Custom came with 275/60R20 and I just want to know how it would look like when the kit is installed. Planning on keeping those tires for a couple of months until I can get Nittos or Mickey.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,867 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...