Jump to content

2018 Silverado 2500hd - Install new speakers using old ones for mounting brackets and wiring connectors


Recommended Posts

Posted

In these videos I show you how to install Kicker speakers in a 2018 Chevy Silverado 2500hd Crew Cab. I use the OEM speakers to make mounts for the replacements. This is great for a DIY dude or dudette, but probably too time consuming for a pro due to the time needed to perform the modifications.

I did this for several reasons:

1. The original speakers failed.

2. I could not find the correct connectors to attach to the truck's wiring harness.

3. The aftermarket mounting brackets I could find were flimsy and had poor dimensional designs.

You can find the videos here:

Front:

https://rumble.com/vgkdnl-2018-chevy-silverado-front-speaker-replacement.html

 

Rear:

 

https://rumble.com/vgkemv-2018-silverado-crew-cab-rear-speaker-replacement.html

 

I also replaced the dashboard speakers using the connectors from the OEM ones. I did not make a video for those but have included some pictures here to give you an idea of how that was done.

 

The Kickers work pretty good; they are not the fanciest, but are reasonably priced and able to handle all the power the original GM system can throw at them. Under normal listening volume levels they work perfectly. When blasting some Robin Trower or Sammy Hagar at full volume, you will get some distortion. But, well engineered music (e.g. Supertramp "Rudy",  Pink Floyd "Any Colour You Like") can be played at full throttle with excellent results - I have to be careful with that!

 

I hope this information helps.

Front Speaker Installed.JPG

20210106_150726.jpg

20210106_110921.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Good find. When I was doing the work on my truck I did not find these connectors - only ones for earlier models were listed.

 

The other part of my suggestion is to use the old speakers to make mounts for the new speakers - since the old ones will be either discarded or collect dust on the shelf. The Metra brackets I ordered were too shallow to engage the speakers with the door panels on re-installation. The OEM parts are much stronger and have design features that are not on the aftermarket parts (i.e. integrated deflector and mount clip).

 

Thanks for looking at the post.

 

Is that a Vizsla in your profile pic?

 

:)

Posted

Crutchfield.com 

They supply the brackets and the connections for free. And free shipping. 

I run Kicker KS series door speakers along with the

GM Kicker 200w powered subwoofer with 200w Amp for the door speakers. Kenwood dash speakers. Sounds pretty good. 

The stock head unit don't put out much for power so your missing out what the speakers should sound like. They need more power to sound good.

 

Posted

Also, good information for those looking to upgrade.

 

Again, my use of the old speakers to make the brackets and connections keeps them off the shelf and out of the landfill. And, they are much more robust than anything I have seen in the aftermarket space. I suspect that GM spent a lot to engineer them. They have features like a mounting bolt bushing to prevent the plastic from being crushed and damaged during installation. That feature alone is desirable as it allows significant torque to keep the unit from coming loose and rattling  - speakers do vibrate a bit. There is also a deflector molded in that is either for sound or to keep water that might get in the door from getting on the speaker. Last, they have that little metal clip that holds the assembly in the door before the bolt is installed - a small but convenient feature.

 

I do agree that upgrading the amp will produce more and better sound. However, for me, after five decades of blasting rock and roll I have to limit the potential for me to damage my auditory sense. I even have to wear hearing protection (so far just cotton) when the wife and I go to see Sammy. But, for many out there installing more powerful equipment is understandable. Especially when you consider that many new amps are very reasonably priced. A about two years ago I installed an 1100 watt 5-channel amp in my daughter's 2003 MB ML500 for about $130. They have come up in price since then, but are not at what they were 10 or 15 years ago. The OEM fiber-optic connection between the CD changer and the head gave out and killed the hole system (stupid design). I put a new transducer on the board buried deep in the head  -  worked once for 20 seconds and messed up the traces on the board on the second try. I got her a cheap head with no CD for about $110 at Best Buy that had Bluetooth, Pandora, speakerphone, etc. The whole thing was done for about $250 and she loved it. So, I am not against doing an amp upgrade - I just can't trust myself with that power with these old ears. :)

Deflector.JPG

Bracket Bushing.JPG

Mounting Clip.JPG

Posted

One of my favorite car install guys on Y-tube posted this a bit ago:

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Hey Mike,

 

I watched the video and was very impressed with the install. It is interesting to note that the spendy little AmpPro AP4-GM61 is specified for vehicles with the Bose system and they install it on the non-Bose anyway (as well as others in the comments). It is confusing to the consumer as to why the are spec'd that way but it sure seems to work.

 

I did learn the correct door panel removal technique from the video though. I was originally removing them the old fashioned (not "old school") way along with the inner weather strip/sill at the top. It is nice to know that part can be safely separated because it is a pain to get back on if not done that way.

 

The speaker mounts they use seem to be less stout than the OEMs that I used (and shallow so as to need the foam "tunnels"), but a professional is not going to want to take the time to do the modification I describe. They also add a ton of what appears to be sound deadening material to the inner door frame. My swap-out was kept as simple as possible with an eye toward simplicity and cost mitigation. Additionally, one of my videos shows how to get the speaker out without completely removing the door trim panel. This helps keep it simple and reduces the wear on the panel retention clips.

 

While I did not post a video of the dash tweeter work I did, the pictures below show the use of the connector removed from the OEM speaker to make a harness. The Kicker 47KSC2704 units come with brackets that will drop right in to the original dash location - no drilling or cutting. They also come with proper capacitors to filter the signal going to them.

 

The overriding goal is to not make irreversible changes to the vehicle so as to keep it as stock as possible. Although I plan on keeping the truck for a long time, someone down the road will appreciate my not hacking parts of it off to make room for non-stock equipment (Like some moron back in the 70's did to my '67 GTO pop-top to install Jensen 6x9s in the doors!)

 

The ideas shared on this site are so helpful in keeping these trucks as nice as possible. To that end, I hope I am doing my part.

 

Enjoy!

 

:)

OEM Cap.jpg

Side by side.jpg

Side by side 2.jpg

Harness.jpg

Harness 1.jpg

Harness 2.jpg

Edited by RonnyRaygun
Add information.
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 638 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...