Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What’s up guys, I got a ‘07 Sierra with the 5.3. I’ve replaced the thermostat and it’s not really a issue but sometimes the temp will creep to 215-220 (the space between 210 and 230) and once the fans cut on it’ll go back down. It’s currently 30 degrees in Alabama and she’s still doing it. Kinda seems like it does it more than when it’s warm. Any ideas? Like I said I don’t really see an issue since the fans cut on like they’re supposed to and cool it back to 210, but personally I’m an over thinker and I’m looking for someone to say don’t worry it’s all good. Thanks guys! 

Posted

Back in the day fans ran all the time. Talking pre-clutch days. So air was always moving over the radiator. Todays electric fans mean zero air flow stopped and low at city speeds. Well in town everyone likes to run 3" from the guy in front of them. Hum...highway too I guess. 😉 So yes, they move more and spike higher. Normal. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Back in the day fans ran all the time. Talking pre-clutch days. So air was always moving over the radiator. Todays electric fans mean zero air flow stopped and low at city speeds. Well in town everyone likes to run 3" from the guy in front of them. Hum...highway too I guess. 😉 So yes, they move more and spike higher. Normal. 

I appreciate the response! It was just weird because even in 30 degree weather it’s still doing it, almost more than usual. And too I hadn’t seen it creep up like that before while sitting still until recently. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Braylen0827 said:

I appreciate the response! It was just weird because even in 30 degree weather it’s still doing it, almost more than usual. And too I hadn’t seen it creep up like that before while sitting still until recently. 

 

 

I could be wrong, but I think you can regulate the temperature if you want. You could use a higher or lower temperature thermostat, you could reprogram the computer to run the fans in a tighter temperature range, you could disconnect one of the fans, and hook it up to an adjustable mechanical thermostat that triggers it on/off, you could add an extra "pusher" cooling fan that runs 24/7 when the engine is on, etc etc.

 

I have an '08 with a 5.3, and the temperature is always stable. No fluctuations, after warmed up.

 

 

 

  51sJqpmrGfL._AC_.jpg

WH3102_2-01.png

 

 

41CmlHX1A4L._AC_SS450_.jpg

 

 

 

dcw-dc-0444_up_xl.jpg

Edited by Supreme Pizza
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Try to verify the actual temp with a handheld scan tool.

 

The temp reading of 210 on the gauge is not accurate, it's more like 190-195 in those year trucks. The stock thermostat is a 192 or 194 if my memory is right.

 

I don't see an issue at the moment with what it is doing. But you could also test the radiator cap to make sure it's holding proper pressure and also back flush the fins on the radiator with a hose if you have never done that. Lots of dust and dirt get in there.

Posted
3 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Try to verify the actual temp with a handheld scan tool.

 

The temp reading of 210 on the gauge is not accurate, it's more like 190-195 in those year trucks. The stock thermostat is a 192 or 194 if my memory is right.

 

I don't see an issue at the moment with what it is doing. But you could also test the radiator cap to make sure it's holding proper pressure and also back flush the fins on the radiator with a hose if you have never done that. Lots of dust and dirt get in there.

Man I appreciate the response! The fans are cutting in at 215-220 which everything I’ve read says that they’re intended to kick on at 220. I’m mainly just making sure the temp is suppose to creep up when sitting still like that. Trying to ease my worries. Thanks again!

Posted
1 hour ago, Braylen0827 said:

Man I appreciate the response! The fans are cutting in at 215-220 which everything I’ve read says that they’re intended to kick on at 220. I’m mainly just making sure the temp is suppose to creep up when sitting still like that. Trying to ease my worries. Thanks again!

It will go that high 'sitting still'. Not to worry. A 50/50 mix of glycol gives a 223F boiling point without pressure. You have a 15 psig cap raising that to 268 F as sea level. 

Posted

as stated above try to verify your actual temp vs what the gauge is saying.  MAKE SURE you have removed all air from the system by following the proper procedure.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,943
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Dom Colussi
    Newest Member
    Dom Colussi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 665 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...