Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, my question has to do with transmission fluid level check. (2012 Silverado 1500) Manual says check at normal operating temp between 170-200F. Problem is my normal operating temp is between 120-140F. Should I check temp at my normal operating temp OR try to get the temp up to 170F before checking?

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Huntter said:

Hello, my question has to do with transmission fluid level check. (2012 Silverado 1500) Manual says check at normal operating temp between 170-200F. Problem is my normal operating temp is between 120-140F. Should I check temp at my normal operating temp OR try to get the temp up to 170F before checking?

 

 

Welcome to the forum.

 

First off just to clarify, do you have a 2012 Silverado?  Or a 2021 Silverado?  Reason I ask is the section you've asked this is the 2019-2025 1500s section.  There is a forum section for the older 1999-2014 trucks that I will link here for future reference - 1999-2013 Silverado & Sierra 1500 - GM-Trucks.com

 

To answer your question, GM prefers a hot check to ensure the fluid level is ideally where it needs to be.  You can however perform a cold check that will be fine until you can verify with a hot check.  

 

If you really have a 2012, for both the 4 speed 4L60 and the 6 speed 6L80 the cold check range is the same.  Transmission temp has to be between 80F-90F or 27°C and 32°C if you are in Canada.  Whenever it then has the chance to get hot enough, perform the hot check which is between 160°F to 200°F (71°C to 93°C).

 

If you have a 2021, things change a bit.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

Thanks for the reply. I do have a 2012 Silverado and will use the appropriate section in the future. I quess what is throwing me off is the "normal operating temp"  for me is not 160-200F. At least not in the winter up here in the northeast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 502 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...