Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2012 5.3L LC9 Sierra that has been dealing with the P0521 code for at least a year. When it first appeared, I took it in and the mechanic switched to a PF48 filter from whatever was on there before, and my low oil pressure issues went away. After about 3000 km, the oil pressure dropped again, so I decided to replace the Oil Pressure Sensor with a new GM one. That didn't fix the issue either. Someone told me this could be the oil pick up o-ring, the oil pump, or worse.

 

Most of my driving is short distances, so the check engine light goes off after a few days, but always comes back.

 

My question is, would changing the filter from the PF48 to the PF63 increase the oil pressure since the bypass pressure is higher (22 psi vs 15 psi)?

 

Has anyone done this to fix this issue?

Posted (edited)

Did you replace or clean out the little screen that is underneath the oil pressure sensor?  

 

Seen many of these perform better with the PF-63.

 

Throw one on and give it a go.  

Edited by newdude
Posted (edited)

Yes I replaced the screen under the sensor and cleaned out everything around there that i could.

 

 

I'm close to an oil change, so I might as well. Seems cheaper to try that than dropping my oil pan or replacing the oil pump. From what I have read, lots of people have used the PF63 with no issues on this truck/engine. 

Edited by Sinyk
Posted (edited)

GM issued a TSB that said using an AC Delco Ultraguard oil filter UPF48R (available at GM dealers, some parts stores. or online) may resolve this situation. The problem seems to happen the most on coldest weather startups. Be sure to use a Dexos-approved 5W30 synthetic motor oil, or equivalent. 

 

From what has been said here, it sounds like the UPF63R may be the best of both worlds, then. 

Edited by MaverickZ71
Posted

The confusing thing is they reissued that TSB multiple times. PIP5276C said to use a UPF48R filter instead of a PF48e, but then they revised it  to say don't and just use the PF48, and eventually that you need to replace a ton of stuff due to oil consumption.

 

Since the PF63 has been used by numerous people for years without trouble, then i probably will start there. I think the UPF63R has a way higher bypass pressure, like 33psi, and the filters are double the price.

Posted

I had to replace the sensor twice.

 

Somewhere I recall you can blow out the port it screws in to, I don't remember if it goes to the oil pan or filter, and if the filter had to be off...

Posted

Well I did the oil change, switching to a PF63 and Synthetic 5W-30 Mobil 1. When cold with acceleration, my oil pressure goes up to the 3/4 line. When warm, it sits right around the middle. I didn't drive the truck for a long time this weekend, but so far so good. The pressure was better after the previous oil change with the PF48 though, so time will tell if this holds.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Sinyk, I'm not a mechanic like some on here are, just a guy.  I have the same engine and I've noticed it idles differently based on how much its been driven since the last oil change.  I've seen my oil pressure down around 21 at idle (after complete engine warmup) and highway driving sits on 38-40.  I too quit using the PF48 (which is what the dealers always put on).  I've noticed once I change oil the new idle pressure is around 27-30 after warmup.  My mechanic said dont worry about it unless it goes down under 20.  I think lots of folks with these engines experience this.  I use to go by the computer percentage and when it got to around 25% I'd change, but the idle was around 21-22 after the oil got over 3k miles on it. I was advised to keep clean oil in it.  After much deliberation and back and forth I decided to do just that.  3-4k miles then change it. I don't go by computer anymore.  I just change it at 3-4k miles.  I've used the PF63 filter and had no issues.  It seemed to provide higher pressure at idle than the PF48.  The best idle PSI I ever got was once I paid the way higher price for a more expensive filter rather than the normal PF48 types.  That was with a Fram Ultra Synthetic filter.   I'm certainly no expert but the higher $ filter does seem to provide higher oil pressure. 

Posted

That's good to hear. So far I've noticed with highway driving, my pressure stays pretty well at or slightly under the 275 kPa (40 psi) line. When it's cold it idles above 40 and if i accelerate, it goes up to almost the 3/4 line. When the engine is fully warmed up and idling it looks like it sits closer to 30psi now, not like the 20 or slightly below the 1/4 line it did before. So far I have not seen the CEL return so that makes me happy. I am most concerned about it when camping season comes and I'm towing my RV. I will probably give it another oil change when camping season gets going.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...