Jump to content

A reason not to live in Massachusetts!!

GF7PE

By GF7PE
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

GF7PE Enthusiast

GF7PE

Posted
Posted

A friend of mine have a F-250 super crew as a daily driver and uses it to tow his boat and go out on the beach. He has a diamond plate tool box in the bed and keeps some stuff in there like a tow rope, shovel, board, jack, jumper cables, and a few other odds and ends. Well a few weeks ago he gets pulled over. The cop had followed him for a few miles and he knew he hadn't done anything wrong. When he asked the cop what the issue was, the cop said, " you have the wrong plates on your truck." He went a bit further to explain to him that if he wanted to keep his tool box he would have to get commercial plates. My friend tried to explain to the cop that it was his daily driver and he does not use it for work at all. But, the cop gave him a ticket anyway. So he decides to go to court and fight it. When he did, he lost and was given 7 days to comply and an officer would be sent to his residence to make sure he did comply. So he hung his head, went to the registry and got the commercial plates. Seven days later there is a knock on the door. When he opened the door he saw the cop who gave him the ticket in the first place. They went out to the truck and he showed him that he did in fact get the commercial plates. But, just as all seems cleared up, the cop says "hmmm". then he went on to write my friend a ticket for $1500 for having a commercial vehicle without lettering. He again went to fight it and lost again. When he was told this, he went into a sort of rage. Said how the F@&k am I supposed to letter a vehicle with a business name if I don't have a business!! He was told that he had to put on either side of the truck " not for hire ".

 

is it just mass or is this the case elsewhere??

pacodiablo Senior Enthusiast

pacodiablo

Posted
Posted

WTF!!! That cop must not like trucks or something. He should look into laws and see if there is in fact a law against tool boxes. That is BS. Why would he have to say it is a commercial truck over a tool box? Something is not right. I drive by cops several times a day and have never been pulled over for my tool box (never been pulled over at all actually).

ToeJam Enthusiast

ToeJam

Posted
Posted

I've never heard of that in my life. I'd hire a lawyer and fight that one. There is no way in heck that a tool box makes you a commercial anything. I bet if he didn't have a tool box the cop would have given him a ticket for not having the stuff secured in the bed of the truck.

Wingnut Senior Enthusiast

Wingnut

Posted
Posted

Wow....I think that's one of the most asinine things I've ever heard in my entire life. :thumbs:

 

For a $1500 ticket, I might just have to procure some legal representation.

GF7PE Enthusiast

GF7PE

Posted
  • Author
Posted

well thats just it... he did and sure enough its in the law books. (the lettering that is) still workin on the plates though

silverado man Senior Enthusiast

silverado man

Posted
Posted

You wouldn't have the law number because I would have to see that one for myself. I have not heard that if you have a toolbox on it you need a commercial tag that's just a bunch of :chevy: . Your friend must not have a very good lawyer or the judge must not be having good days lately. That sucks for your friend though. I would be :chevy::D:thumbs: if I was in his shoes.

GF7PE Enthusiast

GF7PE

Posted
  • Author
Posted
You wouldn't have the law number because I would have to see that one for myself.  I have not heard that if you have a toolbox on it you need a commercial tag that's just a bunch of  :chevy: .  Your friend must not have a very good lawyer or the judge must not be having good days lately.  That sucks for your friend though. I would be :chevy:  :D  :thumbs: if I was in his shoes.

he is still fighing the plate issue and it keeps coming up to the "interpretation" of the law. All commercially registered vehilces have to be lettered in massachusetts.

 

p.s. Not too sure if the plate issue is a town, county or state requirement. Also it goes a bit further too. He lives in an area of Cape Cod that is requlated by the Cape Cod Commision. Basically if you live in this area and you have a black mailbox and want to replace it with a white one then you have to go in front of a committee first and see if they will allow you to change it. They also dont allow commercailly registered vehicles to be parked in the front of your property. The vehicle has to stay behind the front line of the house. Same goes for boats too

scooter70 Enthusiast

scooter70

Posted
Posted

I spent the first 20 years of my life in Mass and throughout most of that time, if you had a pickup truck of any kind, you had to have commercial plates. My mom's daily driver '89 stepside had them. I believe that changed a few years ago because my dad now has regular plates on his '04 Z71 Sierra. In all of the time that he did have commercial plates on his trucks, he never had the business name on the truck even though it technically was a "business expense" for tax purposes. (FYI: Your insurance company will charge you more if you have company lettering.)

 

This whole thing is BS and probably just the cops at the Cape with nothing better to do. Man.... am I glad I moved to Michigan. We don't even have safety/emmissions inspections!!

Tfin Enthusiast

Tfin

Posted
Posted

Man, I can't believe that crap! It's got to be a Cape thing. I lived in Boston for 2 miserable years back in 1994-1996. I had a S-10 pickup with a tool box in back. I didn't have commercial plates, nor was i harassed about the toolbox.

 

Thank God I live in Maine! Good luck to your buddy.

SxViper Enthusiast

SxViper

Posted
Posted

First of all you friend was driving around illegaly to begin with.. That truck is rated over 1/2 ton and must be registered as a Commercial. Now for the lettering bull my dad had a 3500 1986 and had commerical plates but no lettering. Thou he didn't have a tool box in the bed. He also should look into if he needs a commerical inspection. I live in Maine now and must register my 2500HD as commerical even thou I never use it for anythign other than towing snowmobiles. We go by weight out here too. I am rated lower than what my truck can really haul (by about 200 pounds) but if I weigh the truck down they can and will pull me onto the scales... It happens... I don't feel bad at all for your friend... That is the law he should have read up on it before he bought the truck. Anything over 1/2 ton needs commerical plates(that was about 3 years ago when I had a S10 so unless they changed it)... Use to be all trucks including S10...

GF7PE Enthusiast

GF7PE

Posted
  • Author
Posted
First of all you friend was driving around illegaly to begin with.. That truck is rated over 1/2 ton and must be registered as a Commercial.

 

Anything over 1/2 ton needs commerical plates(that was about 3 years ago when I had a S10 so unless they changed it)... Use to be all trucks including S10...

well not too sure about that one. Most of my friends drive 2500HD's and not one is registered commercially or have a tool box. When I regd my truck, there was no mention of commercial plates either.

SxViper Enthusiast

SxViper

Posted
Posted

You might want to check that out. They almost allowed me to register my 2500HD up here in Maine no commerical but then they figured out that I was over weight limits for non commerical. The people doing the registry work dont' always know the laws too well... :thumbs: You don't want to get baged for not having commerical plates or you will be going through the same crap as your friend... The law when I went to register in 98 my S10 down there was anything over 1/2 ton had to have commerical plates. So its been a few years and they might have changed that. Here in Maine we still have the stupid law.. But it really does not cost that much more than a regular plate.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Jsdirt
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • parthery
      GM Hard Folding Tonneau by REV review

      By parthery · Posted

      Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • Matt Parker
      Clunk when putting truck into drive and reverse.

      By Matt Parker · Posted

      It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • contrabombarde
      2010 Avalanche 5.3 not running correctly after engine swap.

      By contrabombarde · Posted

      No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...