Jump to content

Got my Westers


Recommended Posts

Posted

and this is the first time i got a chance to know what detonation sounds like!!!

 

i called up lyndon, he told me to run 93 octane gas and a 180 t-stat. well, had the gas in it. not 180 stat! i knew i shoulda done this before!!!

 

so, headed out to find one..no one here has one. AGAIN!!! so i gave up, went to Good year, and they had a guy who was a parts manager at Carquest, so he knew exactly the right part #. got it to me within an hr. and it was only $10!!! im a happy camper. i'll be switchin it out tommorrow.

 

but for the WEsters, can't really say much. noticed the speedo is accurate now. really quiet idle. drives nice for now. i actually could feel the performance difference with Westers and stock. but like i said, i couldn't really test her out too hard. as soon as i heard the pinging... got off the gas and slowly proceeded home to switch her back to stock...

 

i'll post back results soon!!!

Aj

Posted

Butch, i had no tuning prior to Lyndon's.

 

a guy on another forum was tellin me that now that i have audible detonation, that it already existed prior to the tune. any ideas on this Butch???

 

either way, i talked with Lyndon (BTW, AWESOME GUY!!!) and he told me that i will really need to go get a dyno tune and tune my fuel using the fmu. thats about the only thing i can do with the crappy OBS fuel system (d**n U GM!!!)

 

soo i'll prolly be at the dyno later this week.

 

any ideas Butch on the detonation issue???

 

thanks man

Aj

Posted

On my NBS 6.0L I had detonation for about 1-2 tanks before it went away after I installed my Westers PCM. I'm not sure if that would happen on the OBS trucks though...

Posted

AJ,

I know the 96 trucks have a crappy injector system with not much extra flow capacity above stock, and nothing available to fix it either.

If you only got light ping, I think there is a good chance the computer will learn and eliminate it, especially with the 180 stat.

Personally I would make a couple of full throttle runs, backing off only if I heard heavier detonation.

How is your air intake, cold air or underhood air? That will make a big difference too.

I agree you COULD have been getting KR (knock retard) with the stock tune, but it could have been within the range that the knock sensors could handle so you never heard it.

Anyone around your area that has an Autotap or any other real time data recorder? If you could get a data log of a full throttle run, and send it up to Lyndon, he can match the tune to the flow rate of your injectors.

I had the same problem with the Whipple that I had on my 91 GMC, I ended up adding a couple of cans of octane booster or a couple of gallons of 100 octane race gas, that usually keep the pinging down to almost none. I currently run a B&M blower in my Vette too, but that is old school with a distributor and no computer control so it's easy to keep that one ping free!

 

Butch 02 Sierra Denali

Posted

well guys, after i switch the t-stat's, i'll put that ecu in and go do some wot drives..i am praying to god i don't hear detonation!!! i also need to get my fmu tuned. then, hopefully everything will be done!

thanks again guys for the info! very helpful!

Aj

Posted

since im supercharged, i don't think that the air intake would matter, or would it???

 

i don't think soo.. good point intruder, i'll ask him about that!

Aj

Posted

well, i hooked up a scanner to my truck. my air intake temp ranges from 85* when driving to 113*F when at idle... the sensor is placed right after the filter. towards passenger side.. not to mention, i have a big ass intercooler up front to cool the air.

 

i just found out that Holiday 93 octane gas is more lik 91 octane. so that could be the cause of my pinging.. im going to try and richen it up using the fmu. hopefully that will help..

 

i think im going to have to talk with lyndon and have him pull some more timing. but i need to get on a dyno and get some data. send it to lyndon, see what he can do...

 

thanks again guys!

Aj

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
    • Coming back to this question, *my* answer is no, it's not something about which I'm knowledgeable. I'd need to read up on it and understand how it applies to we the consumer and our oil change regimens.   One of your bolded points is that fresh oil in a container contains particulate matter. I don't think I'm surprised, maybe a little bit that it seems to be a major factor, but there's manufacturing process involved in oil and it doesn't exactly come in sterile packaging.    How much is filtered out on the first start by an acceptable quality filter (AC Delco, as a baseline) filter?   On the GM OLM discussion, just saying that the "number of engine revolutions" appears to be a factor in oil life... cough... maybe driving style *does* matter.    
    • GMC has been revising their trim level names over the past several years. Sierra Pro has taken over the Work Truck/SL trim name; Elevation has replaced the SLE (and with the Premium upgrade, SLT) in the SUV lineup of late; AT4/AT4 Ultimate and Denali/Denali Ultimate have been the top of the line in off road luxury and on-road luxury respectively for the full-size pickups and SUVs.    SL, SLE, SLT nomenclatures are gone in the Sierra truck line. Mark my words.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...