Jump to content

Throwing a P0332 code


Recommended Posts

Posted

Truck runs fine. It actually threw the code in Dallas on Saturday, and I drove home (3 hours) with the light on, and have been driving it all week.

 

No knocking, pinging...Runs normal.

 

But I reset the code, and it came right back. So, I'm assuming that I'm going to have to replace the knock sensor (#2 bank).

 

The one on my 92 was on the block, down by the starter. But it's my understanding that I'm going to have to take the intake manifold off to do this?

 

:ughdance: Coooooool.

 

Any hints, tricks, tips....Anyone?

Posted

Audible Spark Knock (Detonation), MIL Illuminated, DTC P0332 Set (Replace Rear Bank Knock Sensor and RTV Area Around Sensor) #02-06-04-023A - (Jun 14, 2002)

 

 

1998-2002 Chevrolet Camaro, Corvette

 

1998-2002 Pontiac Firebird

 

with 5.7L Engine (VIN G -- RPO LS1)

 

1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado, Suburban, Tahoe

 

2002 Chevrolet Avalance

 

1999-2002 GMC Sierra, Yukon, Yukon XL

 

2002 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade EXT

 

with 4.8L, 5.3L or 6.0L Engine (VINs V, T, Z, N, U -- RPOs LR4, LM7, L59, LQ9, LQ4)

 

This bulletin is being revised to add Cadillac Escalade and Cadillac Escalade EXT to the Models. Please discard Corporate Bulletin Number 02-06-04-023 (Section 6 -- Engine/Propulsion System).

 

Condition

Some customers may comment on a mild to severe engine ping (commonly referred to as spark knock), usually worse during acceleration and/or an illuminated MIL. Upon investigation, the technician may find DTC P0332 set.

 

Cause

This condition may be the result of corrosion of the rear bank knock sensor due to water intrusion into the sensor cavity. This condition is more apparent on vehicles in which customers frequently wash the engine compartment.

 

Correction

Replace the rear bank knock sensor and build a dam (wall) around the sensor using RTV to divert water away from the sensor. Use the procedure and part number listed below.

 

Remove the intake manifold. Refer to the Intake Manifold Replacement procedure in the Engine Controls sub-section of the appropriate Service Manual.

 

 

 

Remove the wiring harness assembly from the knock sensor.

 

 

 

Remove the rear bank knock sensor.

Install the new rear bank knock sensor.

 

Tighten

Tighten the knock sensor to 20 N·m(15 lb ft).

 

Install the wiring harness assembly to the knock sensor.

 

 

 

Apply a bead of RTV silicone sealant approximately 9 mm (3/8 in) wide and 6 mm (1/4 in) high along the outside edge of the ridge on the engine block valley cover around the rear bank knock sensor. DO NOT form a complete circle. Leave the rear section open as shown.

From the underside of the intake manifold, completely remove the rear intake manifold seal (foam material).

Install the intake manifold. Refer to the Intake Manifold Replacement procedure in the Engine Controls sub-section of the appropriate Service Manual.

Parts Information

Part Number

Description

Qty

 

10456603

Sensor, Knock

1

 

 

Parts are currently available from GMSPO.

Posted

I like how it simply states "remove intake manifold" :flag:

 

That's not the hard part...It's the "install intake manifold where everything still works" part that always gets you.

 

 

Thanks man. :ughdance:

 

As an aside...There isn't a single auto parts store in town with the Haynes, or Chilton book for my rig...And only one with the part (on the other side of town).

Posted
I like how it simply states "remove intake manifold" :eek:

 

That's not the hard part...It's the "install intake manifold where everything still works" part that always gets you.

 

 

Thanks man. :ughdance:

 

As an aside...There isn't a single auto parts store in town with the Haynes, or Chilton book for my rig...And only one with the part (on the other side of town).

 

 

 

 

Wingnut, I would not waste my money on Chilton or Haynes. Check-out Helms manuals. They are by far the best. IMO worth their weight in gold. I have been wrenching on vehicles for 25+ years, Chilton & Haynes tend to be vague, and in some cases dont contain info on all components/systems. I have a set for 99 Silvy if you need some info. :flag:

Posted

Wingnut I can scan the helms manual instructions for you if you want

Posted
Wingnut, I would not waste my money on Chilton or Haynes. Check-out Helms manuals. They are by far the best. IMO worth their weight in gold. I have been wrenching on vehicles for 25+ years, Chilton & Haynes tend to be vague, and in some cases dont contain info on all components/systems. I have a set for 99 Silvy if you need some info. :flag:

 

 

 

 

Yeah, I know all about Helms, I've had them on the last 3 trucks I've owned. Unfortunately, I would rather do this sometime this year. :eek:

 

I could probably do it without a manual, but it's kind of nice to know the details.

 

 

Wingnut I can scan the helms manual instructions for you if you want

 

 

 

 

I would be forever in your debt Ryan. :ughdance:

Posted

While you're pricing out parts, find out how much the knock sensor sub-harness is (if there is one). Most vehicles that I've seen with knock sensors under the manifold have a sub-harness that goes from the knock sensor to the main harness. Because of the location of these harnesses, they tend to heat up and get brittle over time, causing excessive resistance and even open circuits. More than once I've seen someone have to pull an intake off twice to have to replace this harness the second time around (most often on Toyotas). Just a little cheap insurance.

Posted

Hi;

I had the same code with my 99 silvreado. As I don't have access to a garage at this time I didn't really want to take the intake off outside in the winter. After I determined that it was a bad knock sensor and not a wiring or pcm problem I coupled the two sensor wires together with a capacitor and just use the front sensor for a knock signal. No more codes and it runs better than ever. This works great and is a lot easier than pulling the intake. Can anyone tell me why there is two knock sensors anyway?

 

Thanks

Posted

Hi;

I disconnected the sensor wires at the harness on top of the motor and connected one lead from the cap to each sensor wire. Then I put the good sensor wire back in the harness and left the bad one unplugged. This lets the pcm think its receiving signals from the two sensors. I have about 8k on since doing this and it has set no more codes. It runs better than ever now. I used a .1 micofarad 50 volt capacitor. I have not noticed any knock and run 87 octane. I think this works better than the two sensors because now the pcm sees the values of the sensors as exactly the same and therefore no reduction in ignition timing.

Posted

The 99-00's seem to have a few issues with false KR (knock retard), mostly after a more agressive camshaft and springs were installed. I know first-hand...(check my sig, I dumped my 99 PCM for a PCMforLess custom tuned 02 PCM). I'm sure that there's some false KR on umodified vehicles also. I could definitely see how fooling the PCM's knock circuit would make your 99 run better e.p. Granted, you don't have knock protection now, but if you run good gas and keep your eye on it you should be OK.

Posted

Hi;

 

I think that I still have knock protection because I'm still using the one sensor. Maybe not as good as having the two of them in use. All I can say is it works good and no more ses light.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Be sure and check the Connector under the Cable Shroud! It's just perfect for pulling-apart, if you tug on the cover towards the front. That'll blow the code everytime, and usually for only one bank most of the time. Only ocassionlly would it call both my banks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,044 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...