Jump to content

Don't want DRL'S


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have read a lot about people who want to disable the DRL'S. I have even seen schematics on line at some site for people who hate DRL's. I have one out now, I am thinking just let the other one go til it burns out and not replacing them. I can think of no adverse effects to doing this, anyone else?

Posted

Other than the off chance of getting hit by a semi that didn't see you...I don't see any ill effects. :confused:

 

 

 

 

Sorry, I just don't get why some people hate them so much.

 

Heck, you can't even see them (as long as you're driving like you're supposed to, instead of like Indiana Jones).

 

Totally unobtrusive safety feature in my opinion.

Posted

I put amber bulbs in my 2000. Looks better and still makes the truck noticeable to oncoming traffic. I want every chance that the dummy in the other car will see me...lol. IMHO, the clear bulbs look like crap. :confused:

Posted

I have nothing against the idea of having DRL's, just dont like replacing them. They are on all the time so they don't last. Besides, the guy driving the semi is probably so close to falling asleep you would need search lights to get his attention. Those little parking lamp bulbs aint gonna do it! :confused:

Posted

correct me if I am wrong, but i think on the obs trucks there arent different bulbs for the drl, instead they just light the headlights up - hence the need for wiring schematics, etc. it isnt as simple as removing the bulb cause then there would be no lights!

Posted
correct me if I am wrong, but i think on the obs trucks there arent different bulbs for the drl, instead they just light the headlights up - hence the need for wiring schematics, etc.  it isnt as simple as removing the bulb cause then there would be no lights!

 

 

 

Yes, some vehicles have an extra filament in the headlights for the DRL's. Fortunate for people with NBS GM trucks, they are independent.

Posted
Other than the off chance of getting hit by a semi that didn't see you...I don't see any ill effects.  :confused:

 

 

 

 

Sorry, I just don't get why some people hate them so much.

 

Heck, you can't even see them (as long as you're driving like you're supposed to, instead of like Indiana Jones).

 

Totally unobtrusive safety feature in my opinion.

 

 

 

 

Yeah, I'm with Wingnut on this one. They give a little bit of safety edge, and why not take it?

 

Convenient too. Where I live there are a few mandatory day-light safety zones – that is, must have some sort of headlight on even in bright sun. With DRL’s I don’t even have to take notice of those signs anymore. I’m automatically legit.

 

If you're going to let your lights burn out, at least remove the bulbs so they won’t corrode in the socket. If that got bad you could find yourself with a totally corroded DRL fixture. Not good at time of re-sale or trade-in. Perhaps you could find a short piece of wood dowel, about what? 1 inch long and ¾ inch diameter? to snug in there. Wrap in a small bit of heavy plastic sheeting so it will fit in tight but without distorting the socket receptacle.

 

gnutruk

Posted
Yes, some vehicles have an extra filament in the headlights for the DRL's. Fortunate for people with NBS GM trucks, they are independent.

 

On GM vehicles that use the headlights for the DRLs, there is not an extra filament in the headlamp. What they do is run power through the two lamps in series, rather than in parallel like in normal headlight mode, to get the somewhat dimmer headlights.

Posted
Yes, some vehicles have an extra filament in the headlights for the DRL's. Fortunate for people with NBS GM trucks, they are independent.

 

On GM vehicles that use the headlights for the DRLs, there is not an extra filament in the headlamp. What they do is run power through the two lamps in series, rather than in parallel like in normal headlight mode, to get the somewhat dimmer headlights.

 

 

 

 

I didn't know that about the older trucks in the GM fleet. As I said, some vehicles DO have an extra filament for the DRL's. The guy at one of the auto parts places told me some people get real angry when they find out they have to replace a perfectly good headlight to get the DRL's working again. I have also heard of some Mazda's(?) that use a low voltage relay to deliver a lower voltage to the DRL'S.
Posted

I get an insurance discount for DRLs. So, it's a matter of honesty for me to keep mine working. I just put amber bulbs in and they look great. If you get the 'LL' kind (long life) they last a really long time.

Posted

I went with amber bulbs in the DRL's on my 99 black Silverado Z71. They look better in amber and stand out in the sunshine. I don't have any problems with DRL's at all. Having separate bulbs for them instead of simply reducing the voltage to the headlights is a better deal. If I didn't want them, I would simply pull the bulbs.

Posted

I'm sorry but I'll say it again, If you can't see me coming towards you in my truck in broad daylight without DRL's...............YOU SHOULDN'T BE ON THE ROADS!!!

I don't like DRL's or auto.headlamps,never have-never will.

The only reason some car manufacters put them in is because of people who are to stupid to turn on there own lights when its dark,raining or foggy.

I've have seen people like this and I cuss them royally because its there fault DRL's and auto.headlamps are on cars and trucks today. :confused:

OK I'll get down off of my soapbox now...I just had to vent a little :seeya:

Posted
DRLs are a PIA.......On the NBS just pull the bulbs !

Driving with 1 out is just ASKING 5-0 to stop and talk to you !

 

Heres a site to disable DRLS and Auto ons......

http://www.lightsout.org

 

 

 

All I know is where I live, DRL's are an option , you can have both on, one on or none on and nobody will stop you. Back up lights are not even required, they are a convenience to you the driver. That is what an inspector from motor vehicles told me when I had my '65 'stang inspected. Canada requires all cars to have DRL's.

Posted

So here is the thing from the Motorcycleing community about DRL's.

 

Before DRL's, motorcycles were the only vehicles on the road with a headlight on all of the time. This was the only thing that we had to set us apart from the cages that like to pull out in front of us, run into us, cut us off, etc. I do think that the DRL's are a good idea, but they need to be rethought so that the advantage is not taken from the motorcyclist.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 922 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...