Jump to content

Little Diesels


Scyry

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not sure if it has its own thread here, but the idea of little diesels in trucks/suvs. I have seen people post how they would like to see it. I know it is not a GM product but the Jeep Liberty is the first recent vehicle I have seen to go diesel. I like the idea and wonder why GM hasn't made a Baby DMAX for the 1/2 tons, Tahoes or maybe a 4 Cylinder DMAX for the Colorado? I think Jeep did it because of the Diamler influence, and wht they have seen in Europe.

 

Does anyone see a reason why GM hasn't done this? Maybe emmissions problems or something? Though diesels have come a long way on performance and emissions of late.

 

With Biodiesel coming along a lot of problems could be helped out with diesels becoming more wide spread. It would help out farmers in the midwest with increase crop demand. There would be less demand for foriegn oil, and so on. Bush even pushed clean burning diesels recently (omg he said something that made sense). So what is the hold up?

 

Just trying to start a thread, to hash this out. I have noticed GM comes here and askes for input from time to time. Maybe we could get some ideas and push them along to GM through the board?

Posted

if you haven't read the reviews of the Jeep Liberty Diesel, it supposedly bites. rough, unrefine, noisy, all torque, but nothing too powerful. Motor Trend made it sound like it was an 80's style diesel.

Posted

Not saying the Liberty is great, just saying it is a step in the right direction. I know some states don't even want diesels in them. California won't let you buy a VW Jetta TDI there, and I don't understand that. I guess i am more hoping to get to why diesels are seen in more places.

 

I'd buy a DMAX if it wasn't so over priced. With the sucess GM has had with the DMAX, I just don't understand why they haven't expanded their diesel market.

Posted

Just grab the V10 diesel out of the VW Touareg. Seems VW has the market on small diesels. Personnaly I would love to see some in the smaller vehicles. A friend has an old Isuzu Pup with a diesel and that thing takes a beating and is still running even thought the body is trashed from all the farm work.

 

I think the main reason is the general public doesn't like the black smoke issue, even though it is getting better, they think it is worse for the enviroment than a gas exhaust. From what I read it isn't that great but isn't as bad. The noise of a diesel is another issue that is stereo typed in along with no power and hard to find plus higher cost of fuel.

 

I can say this much, my jetta saves me $130. a month in fuel cost over my truck. That is $1560 a year. To me that isn't small change. Once I get it switched over to waste veggy oil, then it will be even cheaper. :thumbs:

Posted

I remember a couple of years ago, this same question was asked in "Four Wheeler" magazine. The reply was that in the United States, the market for the small diesel pickup is just not there. Everyone here wants a large diesel for towing. But in other countries I think, if I am not mistaken, that there are a few manufactures doing this, Toyota, maybe Isuzu. I don't remember for sure, but the reason was definately a marketing one. But who knows, I think we may see more alternative fuel vehicles in the future. MMM

Posted

There was two GM smaller prodgrams from what I understand on the mill for awhile. One was a V-6 DuraMax for larger SUV's and 1500-2500 pickups. The other was I-4 Turbo Diesel like for the Colorado and simular size vehicals. GM killed their programs from what I understand when Ford killed theirs when they where fueding with Navastar over the problems they where having with the 6.0 PowerSmoke. So those of us who like to see more Diesels at reasonalbe costs are left out. Part of this is blamed with the trouble makers are haviong meeting the new Emmision standard that will come in to place in the next few years for Diesels.

 

It's a bit frustrating.

Posted

I drive diesels regularly. For around town vehicles they are a blast, even in the 1 and 2 ton box trucks I drive around for work. Gotta love that torque.

 

I just wish I could get my hands on that new BMW direct injection inline 6...some european journalists actually preferred it to last years gas engine it was so responsive!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 486 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...