Jump to content

4L80E plumbing


PLascell

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 4L80E ATF pan temp gets up to 250 degrees pulling steep grades with 5th wheel. Trying to cool it down more than what the factory aux coller is doing. Engine water temp doesn't get above 195 degrees.

 

I want to add additional trany cooling to 2000 3500 CC DRW 4WD 7.4L that came with aux trany cooler. Dealer can't tell me which way the ATF flows in the top and bottom radiator tubing. Which is from the torque converter (hotest)?

 

Also, what kind of fittings (thread sizes) are the metal tubing connections to the radiator transmission coil? Dealer parts man says 5/8 -18 UNF but I can't find fittings like this on the web. Is this a typo?

Posted

The cooler lines on the trans are arranged one in front of the other. The forward most connection is the output to the top of the cooler in the radiator.

 

I don't know offhand what the thread size is, but no way it's 5/8ths. 5/8ths is the size of a heater hose! I'd say more like 3/8ths, but maybe 5/16ths. Never really paid much attention to the size.

Posted

Worked on the truck today and confirm the front ATF connection does go the the top radiator connection and it is hotter than the rest which confirms the TC connection. The fittings at the radiator are 3/8 Inverted flare and generally know by this at the auto parts store. The thread pitch is 18 TPI. The outside dia. of the male threads is 0.618. The wrench required is a 5/8 open end.

 

I ended up adding a second aux cooler (7500 BTU) between the output of the 4L80E and the input to the radiator. The factory tow package place a larger aux cooler on the outout of the radiator in the return line to the transmission.

 

It will be a few weeks before I try pulling the 5th wheel up the 12% grade to see what effect it will have.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...