R Dogg 56 Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 I'd protest too if I knew my car's tires were unsafe $0.02 USD, but I think the fans should have gotten their money back for not being able to get their money's worth in F1 racing. The FIA ought to be ashamed of themselves for what happened. Edit: see my other post in this thread.
facn8me Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 That suck's. I'm not a big F1 fan but I am glad to see the owners and drivers not comprimising saftey.
Indy Posted June 20, 2005 Posted June 20, 2005 That suck's. I'm not a big F1 fan but I am glad to see the owners and drivers not comprimising saftey. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's pathetic but at least nobody died because of a tire failure.
blue2kzr2 Posted June 20, 2005 Posted June 20, 2005 It does suck, but Michelin shouldn't be faulted for this. Michelin apparently offered to fly new tires in but the FIA declined due to a rule that says teams are only allowed one set of tires per weekend. The FIA should be faulted for this in full due to thier hard-nosed approach. I side with the teams here, no sense compromising a driver's (or several) life, and the car that cost a pretty penny to make, just to race a full field.
silverado3500 Posted June 20, 2005 Posted June 20, 2005 The FIA shot themselves in the foot at trying to gain any respect here in the USA. They say that the FIA covets the American market. If this is true, they should show this by offering a full refund to all the people who attended the race. They could have easily put up the chicane in that turn to make it safe for everyone. I don't fault Michelin, as blue2kzr2 mentioned, they offered to fly in replacement tires. The only people to blame are the FIA. Oh well, More power to Nascar.
SnakeEyeSS Posted June 20, 2005 Posted June 20, 2005 well, I'm not sad I missed this years race after all, but I do plan to take off for next years!
R Dogg 56 Posted June 20, 2005 Author Posted June 20, 2005 I did not hear that Michelin was willing to fly in replacement tires for the cars. Thanks to blue2kzr2 for adding this. I retract my statement about faulting Michelin. And the NASCAR race yesterday was interesting. The only major incidents that I saw were Brian Vickers (?) hiiting the water barrier at the entrance to Pit Lane, and Sterling Marlin's motor asploding and allowing for a small oil fire. Glad everyone was okay afterwards. Did you guys see "Batman" and the "Batmobile" at the start? I would love to have that back axle on a truck.
Scyry Posted June 20, 2005 Posted June 20, 2005 I was reading the FIA was blaming the teams for not having their second set of tires be different from the first set. Supposedly if they'd of had the less sticky, all weather, all condition set from Michilen they would of been able to run. Probably would of been a crappy race then, but atleast they'd of had a decent number fielded.
blue2kzr2 Posted June 20, 2005 Posted June 20, 2005 I got the impression the FIA only allowed one set of tires per team per weekend. Having a second set there wouldn't have helped in that case...
Scyry Posted June 21, 2005 Posted June 21, 2005 ESPN.com Article on It "The FIA also pointed out that each team is allowed to bring two sets of tires, including a slower tire suitable in all circumstances. "Apparently, none of the Michelin teams brought a backup to Indianapolis," it noted."
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.