Jump to content

Removing Cats from 2002 Silverado!


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2002 Silverado, and I live in West Virginia, we don't have emission testing. I was wondering if anyone knows where I can find off road pipes, which are the pipes from the exhaust manifold to the stock muffler flange. I need this pipe but without the catalytic converters? Anyone know where I can find such.

 

Thanks Lee :thumbs:

Posted

I dont think you can take the cats off because there are sensors in the cats, and that will trigger the computer to give an error.  I could be wrong on this though. ???

Posted

I do not understand why you would take them off. Do you have some proof that they will give you more power?  Is there something about your cats that is particularly restricting you?  My budy is running a 502 with dual exhaust and dual Catco brand Cats and the difference on the dyno, with and without exhaust (mufflers and all)  is 2.3 hp.  This truck is built for racing and has some serious flow.  Unless you have some pretty serious mods, I doubt the cats are hurting you.  To each his own. :thumbs:

Posted

Your best bet would be to cut the cats out and replace with the same sized piping. Don't think you're going to find a direct replacement. While you're at it you might consider setting it up for true duals.

 

On the downside, you have 4 - O2 sensors before and after each cat. The trucks computer monitors the emmisions before and after the cats. If there isn't a reduction in emissions between the forward and rear O2 sensors, you will get an error code. That will require reprogramming the truck for not having the cats.

Posted

If it's a 2002 you shouldn't mess with them, it might void the warranty.  I asked my dealer about dual exhaust for my truck he said as long as I don't mess with the cat's, it wouldn't void the warranty.

Posted

I took my coverters off a while ago but my mom made me put them back on. You do need cheater boxes for the rear O2 sensors so it does not set off a code. My truck ran fine with these cheater boxes. I still have them if you want to buy them or you can get them Casper electronics. Just e-mail me if you have any questions.  :thumbs:

Posted

Also, by taking cats off of newer vehicles you are breaking federal law, doesn't matter if your state doesn't have emissions, your still breaking a federal EPA regulation which trumps all state laws, therefore you still must abide by that law.  If you run across a police officer (any officer can enforce this law, not just federal) who has a good eye or ear or is very picky, he will find out and the fine for removing cats, and the fine is at least $5000.  Maybe no one in WV will care, but if you ever travel out of state, they do.  The cats are the only thing that clean-up emissions at all, that is why they are required.  So remove at your own risk.

Posted

Yeah, I don't see much point in doing this other than voiding your warranty.  If it was an older vehicle it might be worth doing if you had a problem with the converter but otherwise there is not much benefit to doing it.  Also, try to find a repait shop willing to take the risk.

Posted

Catalytic convertors got a bad rap back when they were the old pellet style.  They had a tendency to plug up and did not flow well even when new.  I still have this style on my '90 Chev.  The newer style monolithic cats are very efficient and cause very little loss if any.  GM started using these in 1991 on their truck line.  When they go bad they do not flow as well and make a terrible rattling noise.

 

I guess the general consensus on this board is to leave them alone. I would still like to see the dyno chrts where someone proves they rob all this horsepower on a mild street truck.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

The cats on your truck are as free flowing as they come.  I wouldn't take them off unless you felt you needed too.  If you do however take them off you can buy a relay that will trick the Post Cat O2 sensor into thinking that everything is all right.  It will make the truck quite louder and not to mention free up some horsepower, but it will hurt your gas mileage, just because the truck's computer which controls air/fuel mixture will be getting a constain single and not adjust to less fuel when it is not needed.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A complete delete is the most thorough mechanical solution, but it is also major engine work. On a quiet truck that is still under extended warranty, opening the engine purely as prevention is difficult to justify. A plug-in disabler stops commanded cylinder deactivation, but it does not remove or repair the collapsible lifters, so it should not be treated as failure insurance. I would keep the oil full, document the maintenance, and have any persistent tick, misfire, or loss of power diagnosed promptly. If the engine eventually has to come apart, that is the logical time to compare an OEM-style repair with a complete delete. The right choice depends on the truck’s symptoms, warranty status, expected ownership period, and whether the engine already needs to be opened. We explain that decision in more detail here—full disclosure, this is our own guide: https://www.bluev8.com/blogs/news/do-you-actually-need-an-afm-disabler   One exception: some 2021 L82/L84 trucks have RPO YK9, meaning cylinder deactivation was already disabled in the factory ECM; on those trucks a plug-in disabler is redundant, although the AFM/DFM hardware remains inside the engine.
    • Brought my 2015 Colorado into the dealership to check my touch screen issues, had that ghost touch thing happening. They said I needed a new touch screen and they could either order me one for $500. The lady at the service deck was nice enough to tell me I could order a touch screen online for less, she did stipulate that the touch screen had to be factory OEM, you can't pair an aftermarket screen to my radio seeing it was 2015, it had to be a GM factory OEM only. I found a few on Amazon and Ebay by the numbers on the back of the old screen, DJ080PA-01A GM# 22740886, Some said "OEM" in the description and others just said "Replacement". Would a replacement be the same as a OEM as long as it had the same numbers on the back of the screen? In some of the descriptions they also show different brand names but same numbers, is that an issue?  
    • I have both but typically use the 4 legged walker (wheels on front, ski's on back).   The four wheeler is starting to be used on "longer" outdoor walks.  The 4 legged walker is particularly helpful in practicing good walking posture.  Both of my knees are at different stages of recovery and I'm trying to not develop poor habits.  I can actually manage with a cane but it's very difficult not to favor one leg over the other.  My PT recommends I continue with my 4 legged walker for a while.  Yesterday was four weeks since my last knee replacement and I'm excited about my progress to date.  It has been a hell of a rough journey so far but it is exciting to witness  systematic and continuous improvement.  I went for years watching the decline of my "mobility".  It seems that everyday now I am alerting my wife to something I can do now that I couldn't a day or two ago!  I encourage anyone facing the prospect of knee replacement to share any concerns with others who have had the surgery.  It isn't an instant fix but rather is a considerable amount of short term pain for long term gain.  Recovery time and pain levels vary for individuals post surgery but the end results are typically very positive and I've never encountered anyone regretting having had the surgery. 
    • The lifter issue can be dealt with by shorter oil changes and quality oil IMO.
    • Got heavy rain, hail and light rain yesterday. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...