Jump to content

89 S-10 Blazer Crazy RPM Problems


rublazn

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have 1989 S-10 Blazer 4.3 217K. I have been having trouble finding what is causing the variations in RPM while driving. I have checked the codes and nothing. Sometimes while driving the RPM will elevate to 2500 to 3500 once I come to a stop. The park rpm should be around 1000 but it's reveing on up. If I cut the truck off and leave it for a while and crank it up once the engine is cool again the truck runs fine. I have noticed really poor gas mileage also. I have changed the map sensor and several other ones but nothing seems to make a difference. Not sure what to try next.

Posted
Possibly the idle air control valve, but without much information, that's just a wild guess.

 

 

 

Is there any way to check that part. I have replaced that about a year or so ago. Should it send some codes or something.

Posted

There are no codes for the IAC that I recall. Having a scanner that can display IAC counts would be the first step in seeing if this is what's wrong. If the idle is high and the counts are zero, that means the ECM is trying to extend the IAC fully to slow the idle down and if it's not, it is either a bad IAC or there's a wiring problem. If the counts are high, say 40 or 50 (rough guess), then the ECM is commanding the IAC to open which is causing the high idle. Now you need to find out why the ECM is commanding it open.

 

We have a little device we can plug into an IAC and operate it ourselves. With that we can see if we can change the idle up and down. That's not to say it can't stick at times and not operate.

 

So there's where you start.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...