Jump to content

Tires and MPG


Recommended Posts

Posted

I know this topic has been beaten to death, but fuel economy has not been the main focus in the LT vs. P rated tire debates. I am about ready to replace my OEM P rated tires on my 2003 Silverado ECSB Z71. I don't tow or haul anything except for a 600 lb (loaded weight) boat trailer (VERY small boat!), so P rated tires would be suitable enough for this truck - I don't want to debate load handling characteristics. That being said, I prefer the ride of LT rated tires and like the idea of sturdier construction (even though I don't "need" it). My concern is fuel economy. When I replaced the OEM Goodyear P-metric tires on an a GMC Jimmy I used to have with LT (load range C) Revos, my MPG dropped by a solid 10-15%. I'm not sure if it was the tread design, rolling resistance, weight, or a combination. I don't want a repeat of that again. I would have thought that since I inflated the LT tires more (45 vs 35 psi), they would actually help fuel economy or have no effect. Can anybody quantify the difference in fuel economy between LT rated and P rated tires of the same tread pattern? I am planning on buying Cooper Discoverer ATRs, but just can't decide between P and LT. If I thought MPG would be the same, I'd go LT in a second. I just don't want to pay more for the tires and continue to pay more in gas for the next 50-60,000 miles when I don't "need" LT tires...

Posted

I've never noticed any loss in MPG going from "P" to "LT" tires,but I still run 35 psi in them.

I've never run 45psi,Thats a little too high for me and what I need.

Try running the "LT" tires with 35psi in them and you should be OK. :D

Posted

I got Cooper AT's as replacements for the oe P metric goodyears. The only downside I noticed right away was the P metrics gave the truck a ride quality similar to a Caddy. The LT's definately gave a harder ride, it is really quite noticeable. I never checked gas mileage with the oe tires so I don't know if it went down or not.

Posted
I've never noticed any loss in MPG going from "P" to "LT" tires,but I still run 35 psi in them.

I've never run 45psi,Thats a little too high for me and what I need.

Try running the "LT" tires with 35psi in them and you should be OK. :D

 

 

 

 

Well, that's good news for the LTs. When I ran the LTs at around 35 psi, they were even worse than at 45 (as would be expected).

Posted
looked at my tires over lunch - they're rated at 50 psi!  I checked and theyre filled to 35. I might run them at 50 and see of I notice a change in MPG

 

 

 

 

Just because the tires can handle 50 psi, it does not mean that this is the recommended inflation pressure for your truck. Follow the manufacturer's recommendation.

Posted

I just switched over from P to LT tires. I'm pretty meticulous about keeping track of the mileage, so after I've gone through a full tank (Probably another week or two), I'll post the before & after.

Posted

LT tires tend to weigh more than P's. An equivilent LT tire is roughly 10 or 11 lbs heavier than a P and are constructed differently generllly leading to decreased mpg's. I'll be interested to see your follow up Socal as I'm currently looking to put LT's on my wifes rover... is it possible to get negetive mileage?.......

Posted
I just switched over from P to LT tires. I'm pretty meticulous about keeping track of the mileage, so after I've gone through a full tank (Probably another week or two), I'll post the before & after.

 

 

 

 

I will also be anxiously awaiting your results.

 

At this point, I am leaning towards P-metric tires for the up front cost and more importantly potential MPG savings. My dealer actually recommended P-metric for my use. I'd rather have the LTs for ride, but I am just too scared of killing my mileage. I didn't buy a full size truck expecting to get 35 MPG - but at the same time, I don't want to decrease my mileage just because of a tire choice...

Posted

Another thing to remember is that if your new tire is the same size as the old one, but has a more aggressive tread, then you will see a decrease in your milage in most cases.

Posted
Another thing to remember is that if your new tire is the same size as the old one, but has a more aggressive tread, then you will see a decrease in your milage in most cases.

 

 

 

 

True. I'm hoping that tread won't have a big impact either. The tread pattern won't be a huge difference in my case (except for the depth of new treads vs. treads with 65,000 miles on them).

Posted

If your not going to tow or haul anything heavy stick with the OEM tires. They are selected by GM for best ride,mileage & all around driving. I replace my service truck with OEM tires and never have a problem. My employes do a lot of driving and never have a problem.

Posted

If you do a lot of driving on unpaved roads, stay away from the P rated tires. The OEMs that came on my truck were getting ripped apart by my 40 miles of daily unpaved road driving, after just 5,000 miles (Hence my switch to LT rated tires :sigh:)

Posted
If your not going to tow or haul anything heavy stick with the OEM tires. They are selected by GM for best ride,mileage & all around driving. I replace my service truck with OEM tires and never have a problem. My employes do a lot of driving and never have a problem.

 

 

 

 

What are you smok'in? OEM tires are junk. They're selected by GM becauase they're cheap and an ultimate comprimise between all those things.

Posted

I am not smoking and if you go to the tire dealer or tire store and buy the same tire that was on your truck it will perform just as good as the OEM and save you money in gas and ride. I currently have 3 service trucks all the same 2001-02-03 & my personal truck that are 4x4 EXT cab short box and my employies drive them everyday in northern MI on service jobs and i have never had any problems. Loaded these trucks average 16 mpg. I have kept records on my trucks for years and can account for every penny spent. The OEM tires have never failed my people and provide good fuel economy and realibility.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,836
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    hotfish
    Newest Member
    hotfish
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 839 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did you ever get this worked out? Mike is doing the two start thing now too. This is after a new camera back in December. 
    • I’m doing an experiment on a vehicle I don’t have much money in. I’m going by the premise that after they last 100K miles they were no mechanical problems with assembly. Or defects with the parts. With oil changes by the minder for the first 127K miles when I acquired it. I quickly went through low mileage oil changes then settled on 5k oil changes with close to 170K miles on the vehicle currently. I did have the option to turn off the cylinder deactivation. I didn’t on this vehicle because in ECONOMY mode at least half the time. It should be a no brainer frequent oil changes are the key. The manufacturer gets away with the long oil changes with its severe service  maintenance. Just ask them what is normal. 
    • Even set to "recirculated", the air pushes out and is hot. I have noticed that sometime it doesn't want to switch between recirculated/vented air. Say it is set to Circulated Air and I want to switch to Vented, when I click the Vented button, it just quickly lights up/clicks and immediatly switches back to Circulated. It's done this a few times now. So maybe it is an actuator getting stuck? But then, that doesn't explain the hot air when everything is off does it?
    • I wonder what the price is out at the coast, Big Sur or other out of the way locations as I bet they are charging quite a premium over the in land pumps. 
    • Were you looking at the HD trucks on the GM website or the half tons as that makes all the difference. As far as I know there are only two options for the HD trucks and that is the standard 2 speed transfer case or the 2 speed transfer case that has the added 4 high auto feature and they put that transfer case by default into the LTZ and High Country although its optional in the LT and not sure if its available in the work trucks.    The half tons, that is where its been a total mess in my estimation for a few years now with most trucks below the top trim having the single speed transfer case as standard but with the option of having the two speed such as one would get by choosing the Z71 package, however then not being able to get the two speed transfer case with the towing package unless it was a higher trim truck AND had the 6.2 gas so one could combine the towing package gearing diffs with the two speed transfer case. Having said that if its a trail boss package then it gets the two speed transfer case but not necessarily able to get the tow package as it would depend on trim level and engine chosen. Believe me, people have bought the GM half tons assuming "of course it will have a two speed transfer case" only to find out after when they really pay attention to what they now own .... crap, there is NO low range !.    I don't believe Ford or Ram have gone that way yet with their half tons but like I say its been a few years now that GM has done this with the half tons. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...