Jump to content

IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone I would like to know if its possible to put Nav system in a 02 if so what do I need to make it a reality I know I have to replace the dash face and

temp controls but im not sure what needs to be rewired

Posted

Strictly as far a mounting, its much more inloved than just the dash face. The entire insde of the dash and all the mounting points are different. Even if it is possible, all the parts required would easliy triple the cost of an aftermarket unit. So it would be MUCH easier and much cheaper to install an aftermarket nav system such as pioneer or alpine, or such.

Posted

i like my hand held better. it wont give me directions like tom tom but i can take it on my bike, on the boat ,on a hike, to the deer stand ect...about 300 total after add ons like 3 sd cards the maping cd ect. and a mount for the truck and boat.

 

my cousin hates the nav in his MDX it's 5 years out of date and acura wants about 500 to update the system with stuff new resturants ect...

Posted

At one time, my intent was to install the Nav in a 2001. I ended up buying a 2003. It can be done, it's just that it would be hard. Electronically speaking, the radio would need to be able to talk to something via the Class II serial data bus that makes it think it's in an 03-06 vehicle. I work with electronics and vehicle serial communications (for somebody other than GM) and a "box" could be built that does this very thing. It's just that the builder would have to know the specifics of the data interface (which I doubt are available). One guy mentions a "keep-alive" box they have where he works that is exactly what I am talking about:

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46670

 

Once you had such a device that let the radio function normally, then you would have to deal with the completely different amp/speaker wiring and dash format of the pre-03s vs. the 03-06s.

 

I thought one time about trying to design one of these "keep-alive" devices. I searched the web extensively, but could never find any specs for the Class II serial bus. If anyone has any related info, please let me know -- I still might give it a go.

 

Glenn

Posted

I dont think that will help unfortuantly. :cheers:

 

the problem isnt the mismatched harnesses. The problem is the underlying databus/netowrk communication that the 03+ radios/nav radios use. It does not exist in the correct form in the 2001-2002 trucks. There is no real PMM (power mode master) signal on the Class II data bus in 2001-2002 trucks, so likely if you hooked up a 03+ radio, it woudlnt even turn on.

 

CAN and Class II are different databusses with different operating characteristics. Class II operates in a star network pattern with one wire held at 5 volts nominal (or is it 7 volts?). It is otherwise known as J1850 VPW.

 

CAN on the other hand uses two wires (a high and low) terminated at the ends by a 120ohm resistor. Honestly I think the easiest way to do this is two run a secondary 03+ BCM right along side the 2001-2002 BCM. I have a box like this half built and it works on the bench, but I need to test it in a 2001-2002 vehicle. Unfrotuntly its not THAT high on my priority list to get this box completed because I have an '05 truck. It will get done at some point tho :chill:

 

Ben

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

You cant use the 03+ climate controls. The connector and wiring are different. You need the radio/hvac mounting bucket from an 03+ truck/suv. You'll also need to make a 3/4" spacer for the mounting tabs of the HVAC controls.

 

The picture below shows the bucket and where it needs to be trimmed to work in a 99-02

 

bucket.jpg

 

You'll also need the Metra 99-2003 installation kit to mount the new headuni:

 

99-2003.jpg

 

And you'll need a 03+ dash bezel. I picked up a Denali one.

 

denalibezel.jpg

Posted

So you keep the 01 AC controls, just relocate them? How do they look with the 03+ dash opening (because I know the AC opening is smaller on the 03 trucks)?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 469 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...