Jump to content

Poly-Fil


mattro

Recommended Posts

Posted

anyone use this stuff i was thinking about getting some for my box. THere are good reviews on crutchfield but I dont know for sure. They claim it makes the sound louder or tighter or some how better. Well if you have used it give me your personal opinion

thanks

Posted

well i know its bigger than the minimum of 1.5 feet but i also know that it cant possibly be the max which is 6ft. I guess i answered my own question im gonna go to a craft store and stuff it it when i try to mount it in better this weekend. Probably get a sound meter from radioshack although i hear there not right on the dot but ill see what the db difference is if it goes up at all with the same song.

Posted

that stuff is expensive and unless i had some kinda proof i doubt i will try it. The poly-fil is cheaper and ive heard its been used in speaker boxes.

 

well got the sound level meter and guess what....Doesnt go hi enough it averages 111-116db but when i turn up the bass boost and hu it went to the max 126db now i just relized theres two different settings for different frequncies so im not sure if i had it on the right one. Does that seem good for a Kicker 2000watt 15" ran of a kicker *x1500 running 1750 watts sealed box? well its night time now so i cant try the other setting but i did this with the windows and doors closed then set it on my chair toward the sub but not directly by it.

Posted

Well went to my local Micheals craft store and picked up some poly-fil. I was very pleased with its outcome. I didnt get much DB increase but it did go up 2 db on two different songs at a regular listening level it was at about 113db. I put about 2 and 3/4 pounds of poly-fil in my box with the 15" and it cleaned up the sound its much tighter now. I wasnt to sure about it but im very happy with the outcome. If anyone has a sealed box id say definetly give this a try. I was having alot of rattling of my box so i had the bass turned to about 1/4 now i can put it all the way up and it sounds clean. I wouldnt say you need that stuff ment for speaker boxes because this stuff for $2.49 a bag 1lb 4oz works great. Anyways just thought everyone in Radio and sound would like to know the outcome was great and im very satisfied with the way my sub performs.

Posted
Well went to my local Micheals craft store and picked up some poly-fil.  I was very pleased with its outcome.  I didnt get much DB increase but it did go up 2 db on two different songs at a regular listening level it was at about 113db.  I put about 2 and 3/4 pounds of poly-fil in my box with the 15" and it cleaned up the sound its much tighter now.  I wasnt to sure about it but im very happy with the outcome.  If anyone has a sealed box id say definetly give this a try.  I was having alot of rattling of my box so i had the bass turned to about 1/4 now i can put it all the way up and it sounds clean.  I wouldnt say you need that stuff ment for speaker boxes because this stuff for $2.49 a bag 1lb 4oz works great.  Anyways just thought everyone in Radio and sound would like to know the outcome was great and im very satisfied with the way my sub performs.

 

 

 

 

I'm not an expert but my understanding of using fill is that it helps when the box is too small. I added a custom box to the Yukon between the rear captain chairs. Too small a space to make it proper for the sub. Filled the box with fiberglass insulation from Lowe's. Sub hits pretty hard.

Posted

I'm not an expert but my understanding of using fill is that it helps when the box is too small. I added a custom box to the Yukon between the rear captain chairs. Too small a space to make it proper for the sub. Filled the box with fiberglass insulation from Lowe's. Sub hits pretty hard.

 

 

 

 

 

Yah it does make it hit harder. I probably had the minimum or close to its air space for my 15" thats why i did it and because it didnt cost much to test it out. Good to hear another person has tried it and liked the outcome

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...