Jump to content

my setup...!


Sachvie

Recommended Posts

Posted

Crammed into a 1996 sierra ext.cab is....6.5" soundstream components in the front(i think 6.5 correct if im wrong)..6x4 Alpine type R's in the back. Alpine 9853 deck in the front...700watt 4channel Soundtream amp and the best part 2 - 12" boston subs under the rear seat...woot woot. Feel free to comment! Thanks guys!

Posted

They'll fit. Barely, but they'll fit. When I got the downfiring box for two 10's in my '02, there were a couple of guys there at the shop that had 12's in their rigs.

Posted
How did you get a 12" sub under the rear seat? Do you have pictures? Or do the subs have tiny magnets?

 

 

 

 

ya man ill get picks up asap...but they are upward firing also..they do barley fit..lol and i got my amp screwed to the back wall...like i said ill get some pics for ya!

Posted

Looks like a tight fit. But at least you have leg room! My 10" magnet is huge so I had to make a custom box the fits between the drivers seat and the rear. Sounds good though.

 

How do the upfiring subs sound? I was advised against that and was told downfire only.

Posted

i have no problem with it at all...i wonder why u were advised against it? I dont get junk in there at all...and it shakes the hell out of the side view mirrors! haha

 

The magnet was that big?! :confused: wat kinda sub was it and wats its ratings?!

Posted

Nice man i had problems just trying to get 2 12 to fit under my back seat then just gave up and rip them out of my truck and have a plat form in the back with my subs on it. But cool must hit very nice.

Posted

It's a MTX 4000 (?) I can't recall the exact model as I have had it for several years, and didn't want to spend the money on a new system.

 

The magnet is about ~6.5 diameter and ~1.5 thick. It's pretty beefy.

 

The reason why I was advised not to get 12" was for the type of base I wanted, but also because of size concerns. Those car audio guys throw so much info at ya that when you leave your head hurts, so I might be wrong. :cool:

Posted

haha i kno wat ya mean! But i havent had any troubles wit mine yet...and i get great high and low bass. I am switchin from the boston g1's to audiobahn...any words on that?

Posted

I have run Audiobahn equipment, such as amps and capacitors with awesome results. Run there subs? No. However, what I have heard is that they produce several great models and some that cause problems. People say that Audiobahns subs are made to play loud, but are not so great for lower volumes. Again, this is what car audio places have told me. But if you play it loud all the time, rock on!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 504 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...