Jump to content

Truck won't go


Recommended Posts

Posted

On the way home from work last Friday my 02 5.3 ECSB Z71 Sierra with 63000 miles on it had no power and spark knocked badly when I went out to pass someone. When I drove it though my neighborhood slow it was ok but if you gave it any gas it hardly moved and longer you held the gas down the more the spark knock. If I kept my foot in it for several seconds I get the PO303 spark knock/misfire code. So I spent Saturday changing my fuel filter, cleaning my throttle body, cleaning my MAF (CRC spray mass airflow sensor cleaner is awsome stuff), checking my fuel pressure, checking vacuum, looking for vacuum leaks, putting in fresh gas, Techron fuel system cleaner, ....after a days work...still no power. So Monday I took it in to my GMC dealer and left it to them to diagnose and to take care of my ABS recall. 3 and a half hours later they call and tell me my truck was ready. (Cool.....I hadn't even picked up the rent a car yet!!!) The verdict.....Bad Cat. Has anyone else had to replace their catalytic converters. I find it strange that a truck with 63000 miles that has had nothing but Amoco fuels and Mobil 1 oil its whole life would trash a cat. The good news was that it emission related so it was a freebie! What actually causes a converter to fail?

Posted

Really the only thing that causes a cat to fail is it getting plugged with carbon. Have you ever used a top end cleaner through the intake? Even though I am a big fan of the seafoam through the intake, if you have a really carboned up engine, and you clean it out, it can break off large pieces of carbon that will clog the cat. Other than carbon build up or it getting smashed or soemthing that is really all there is to go wrong. All it is is a casing with a honey comb make of materials that reduce the exhause emissions....

Posted

I've never run a top end cleaner through it but I do clean the throttle body every 4th oil change and run a bottle of Techron fuel system cleaner through every other. I was hoping good preventative maintainance would keep me from needing a top end cleaning. I run the freeway back and forth to work and I don't idle much. Do you think I still build up carbon? I had a 93 Sonoma with an HO 4.3 that I maintained the same way and never had problem up til I sold it with 160,000 miles on it.

Posted

With mostly highway miles and you keeping up on it (techron is a very good cleaner), i really cant see it being clogged with 63,000 miles on it, but other than the honeycomb inside being busted, thats really all that can go wrong, there are no moving parts or anything, its essentially just a big (expensive) filter. They used to have platinum in them but they are getting away from that because people were stealing them....

Posted

If the cat overheats the honeycomb can melt causing it to plug without carbon build up. Many things can cause the cat to overheat depending on how you drive (highway vs city, loaded vs unloaded, etc.). It might be worth asking the dealer what they think so that you can modify your use habits if needed so that the next cat is not on you.

Posted

Shouldn't your cat be under warrenty still? I thought I remember reading that the cats are covered long after the actually warrenty of the truck runs out. My truck has a cat failure right now, I have not noticed any loss of power, the code says 'catalyst efficency below threshold' meaning that one of the cats isn't functioning properly. I have been gettting decent fuel milage and it hasn't been running too bad, so I am hoping to make it thru the end of the school year til I start work again....My truck is a 99 and it has 139xxx miles on it...I think mine is just old and clogged...But with less then half the mileage maybe your cat wasn't manufatured properly or something...

Posted

Too rich a mixture, misfires, can cause the cat to overheat, melt, then collapse on itself causing a blockage.

 

DEWFPO

Posted

I have not had the issue with a Chevrolet but did have a CAT failure on a 2001 Jeep Wrangler when it was 3 years old with only 40K miles on it... Never had any other issue with the Jeep up until the time I traded it so I chocked it up to being due to a defective component. In the case of the Jeep it was covered by an extended warranty which I believe we out to 60K miles. The other odd thing is there was no performance degradation due to the CAT failure. The only indication I had was a service engine soon light which when read stated bad CAT.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

My 96 K1500 silverado 5.7 Vortec keeps giving me a code "P0430 = Catalyst Efficiency Below Threshold (Bank 2)". I've replaced the O2 sensors fairly recently so i don't think that is the problem. This truck has 163,000 miles and the catalytic convertors have never been replaced. Does that sound like the problem and if so is there a fairly cheap universal replacement for both catalytic convertors? I know the factory set up with pipes to the manifolds is $300-$500 so i'd rather cut out the old cats and weld in new ones if possible. It also has a "P1403 code = EGR valve pintle position" could this be causing the P0430 code to happen?

Posted
On the way home from work last Friday my 02 5.3 ECSB Z71 Sierra with 63000 miles on it had no power and spark knocked badly when I went out to pass someone. When I drove it though my neighborhood slow it was ok but if you gave it any gas it hardly moved and longer you held the gas down the more the spark knock. If I kept my foot in it for several seconds I get the PO303 spark knock/misfire code. So I spent Saturday changing my fuel filter, cleaning my throttle body, cleaning my MAF (CRC spray mass airflow sensor cleaner is awsome stuff), checking my fuel pressure, checking vacuum, looking for vacuum leaks, putting in fresh gas, Techron fuel system cleaner, ....after a days work...still no power. So Monday I took it in to my GMC dealer and left it to them to diagnose and to take care of my ABS recall. 3 and a half hours later they call and tell me my truck was ready. (Cool.....I hadn't even picked up the rent a car yet!!!) The verdict.....Bad Cat. Has anyone else had to replace their catalytic converters. I find it strange that a truck with 63000 miles that has had nothing but Amoco fuels and Mobil 1 oil its whole life would trash a cat. The good news was that it emission related so it was a freebie! What actually causes a converter to fail?

 

Had one fail on my Denali. Alot of factors can affect why it failed. Probably running rich.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...