Jump to content

New Express Vans


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just got the new issue of truck trend the other day and saw them.  Looks pretty sweet, the motor options are 4.3l V6, and the 4.8, 5.3, and 6.0 V8's.  The chevy has the tracker/avy/new silverado front end style, and the GMC front end looks similar to that of the new Sierra.  The article talked about a longer front end to make them safer in crashes, nicer interior w/ features like the satellite radio and on-star, and as Lane mentioned: Left-Side access doors, AWD option, etc...

 

I'd scan some pics, but I don't have a scanner.  The chevy is on the cover of the new issue of truck trend, I'd recommend picking up a copy.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Don't hold your breath for that 8.1 or the 6.6DMAX diesel.

 

Even while GM did enlarge that front snout for more room under the hood, they also allotted the GEN 3 V8 in the lineup, giving comparable performance, and greater service convenience and economy at the same time.

 

Have you ever looked under the hood of a current model G-Van with a 454 or even a 350 under it? You'd be lucky if you could see the engine, let alone access any service points on it.

 

Although that was better than the previous generation of G-Vans.  My grandfather has a 1990 conversion G-Van, and in order to just change an air cleaner, we had to have one man under the car, one man above, to remove the passenger seat, then remove console trim, wiring harnesses, insulation, and finally, access the rear of the engine, and barely fit the proper size air cleaner on.  Trying to do so from the hood results in a smashed air filter, cutting performance and economy, as the local gas station attendant soon showed us one day.

 

Serviceablity on G-Vans has NEVER been a strong point, let alone a point to even mention, and so, with the 2003 iteration, GM is hoping to change this record.

 

And honestly, how many diesel G-Vans had GM sold in the past?  The answer, even to commercial clients, not very many.  It wasnt a profitable game in the past, and that scares management away from future trials.

 

In the end, the result is, these engines are fine for what they are being used in.  Who knows what we'll see, but most likely, they wont change.

 

MQ

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,003 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...