Jump to content

Need Help Locating a Factory XM Harness


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok so I bought a XM unit off of ebay and thought it would be easy to go down to the dealership and order the harness that goes from the XM unit to the back of the radio. Apparently the only harness that the dealership could find is one that costs 784.00. Its a huge harness and includes other things that I do not need.

 

I found the part number for the bracket which is 15189091 and lists for $14.88

 

What I need is the part number for the harness that comes with that over priced XM kit. Can anyone help me out?

 

Thanks!

Posted

the whole xm kit is part# 12498768. you should be able to call the dealer and get them to give you a breakdown of the parts in the kit. fyi: here is what i found at the avalanche site:

 

XM Retrofit Kit: P/N: 12498768

 

XM Antennas..P/N:

 

'03: 15174788

 

'04: 15205583

--------------

 

XM parts, per Blacktrail_Av on 10-31-05:

 

Cable, digital radio receiver: 15172751

 

Cable, digital radio antenna (inline conn to antenna): 15205597

 

Receiver, digital radio, `must get from seperate souce. Part#: 22692861

 

Receiver, digital radio, kit 2007. Part# 178011509 Common accy item.

 

Bolt/screw, hwa for receiver bracket: 11516618 (needs 2)

 

Bracket, digital receiver: 15189091

 

Cable, digital radio antenna: 15190807

 

Cable, digital radio antenna (rcvr to inline conn): 15205596.

 

Ant, digital radio (40mm high low profile antenna): 15174788

 

Ant,digital radio (35mm high low profile antenna):15205583

---------------

 

From CAFCNA: Willyt.

Ant, digital Radio and OnStar (Digital) combo "Shark Fin": 15194280 List $147.27 whosale $110.45

Cable, For dual service "sharkfin" antenna: #15292901 List $60.66 whosale $42.46.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

If you're just trying to install a generic XM receiver to your factory radio, you should look at getting the harness from P.I.E. at www.pie.net.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,909
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DWic
    Newest Member
    DWic
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 703 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Do you think this width might affect the chalk test with a higher pressure closer to 65psi? I think lowering the pressure makes sense to get the tread to lay flatter
    • I had an alternator fail that was shorted internally in such a direct fashion in addition to the larger gauge cables that it appeared like a VERY dead battery. Granted I think the car did power up, it definitely wouldn't start.   Rodent damage to wiring?
    • ... I don't think he could.
    • Using experience to justify bad advice is lazy and typical of someone incapable of articulating why their advice is prudent.    This immediately sets off the BS alert and the advice that followed certainly qualified.   Asking an idiot for help getting out of dumb situations because he is an expert... at getting himself into dumb situations.   Unless I've been living in an alternate universe - the first thing everyone does when getting into a sticky situation is shift to a higher gear 🤨.   Of course not, the torque multiplication, mechanical advantage and finer control typically afforded by the lower gear is far better suited for this scenario.   There ARE scenarios where a higher gear MIGHT be appropriate determined more by the drivers ability to control EXCESSIVE wheel spin versus applying torque to the ground.
    • I'm not sure I agree with "extreme" low speed, high torque sentiment here with regards to the prescribed use of low range. How about...whenever it's needed?   A 2.72:1 transfer case and whatever differential gears these Silverados have (3.42's, maybe?) aren't producing "extremely" low crawl speeds. Or insanely high torque multiplication. Even with the 1st gear in these newer transmissions. But it does provide mechanical advantage and potentially better control at slower speeds. And with extra weight or towing, I think it adds mechanical sympathy for the truck as well.   Plus, traction control and the other assists generally turn off when you shift into low range. Those aren't needed here, they'll work against you if you need wheel spin. In high range you'll need to figure out how to turn off the various modes those assists provide. Depending on the vehicle, those things don't all automatically turn off or turn completely off.   While I agree that a farmer might have some great practical experience, a recommendation to "always" using one gear isn't very informed advice. If the farmer had said WHY and could explain the physics behind his prescriptive "always" I'd definitely listen. The way he's described here makes it sounds like he could either be uninformed or is telling everyone what worked for him, not necessarily that there could be a more advantageous way about things.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...